Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  erroneous
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Médiá a rodina v kontexte Rímskej mimoriadnej synody

100%
Zasępa T.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2014
|
issue 2
9-20
EN
The mentioned Synod provoced many questions and expetations particulary among Journalists. These questions circulated around problems which are conected with the family but to some degree marginal. All these questions will be answered next year during ordinary Synod. My article describes the main problems of relations between media and family, which were of one of the main interest of the Synod. The television programs offer immens quantity of pictures and information, ways of behaviour, attitudes, views and opinions. It hapens that television presents views, which are in oposition to the values accepted by the Church and family. So, it is needed to dedicate big attention to the problems of influence of media, particulary television on the family.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Legal analogy as an alternative to the deductive model of legal reasoning

67%
Koszowski M.
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
|
2016
|
vol. 6
13-25
EN
This article demonstrates the inadequacy of legal deduction as a method that guarantees the certainty and predictability of law and its outcomes in concrete instances. Inter alia, the Author brings our attention to the far smaller role that the deductive pattern of inference plays in legal thought than one may suppose, since it is rather only a schematic illustration of the decisions that were previously made by recourse to the mental operations of a non-logical nature. In return, he proffers legal analogy as an alternative, by which he understands a mode of thinking which helps the reasoner to take into account a mass of different factors that are traditionally deemed to be relevant for legal thought and decision-making.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.