Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  evaluation of science and research
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Jak se hodnotí kvalita historikovy vědecké práce (Evaluace výsledků české historické vědy podle Metodiky17+ za léta 2016-2020)

100%
Vorel P., Miller S.
Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)
|
2023
|
vol. 121
|
issue 1
49-76
EN
The study deals with the genesis of evaluation processes of the results of science and research in history in the Czech Republic. It summarises the fundamental problems related to the relationship between the evaluation of the results of basic and applied research and the funding of individual workplaces. The attention is focused on the current state of the art, i.e., the progress and results of evaluation according to Methodology 17+ for the past five-year period (2016–2020), defines the main weaknesses of this system and explains why bibliometric tools are unusable for history (and other humanities) in practice and why they are not considered at all in the national assessment of science and research in these fields. It introduces discussion topics related to the currently ongoing adjustment of the entire evaluation system so that it takes more into account the discipline specifics of individual scientific areas.
2
Content available remote

Historická věda a její bodové hodnocení v České republice za období 2013-2015

72%
Vorel P.
Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)
|
2018
|
vol. 116
|
issue 1
131-157
EN
This article recapitulates the course and results of the overall assessment of publication results, both for the science itself and research, in the discipline of "history" in the Czech Republic from the period 2013-2015. Based on the data acquired in this manner, the re-distribution of financial means for further development of individual research organisations was carried out. On average, the discipline of "history" annually presented about 1800 separate results (academic volumes, chapters in books and articles in scholarly periodicals). The author outlines the methodology of assessment and states the names of actual historians who were members of the panel of assessors. In conclusion he lists the main pros and cons, which this model of assessment brought compared to other systems of assessment. The points system, which directly generates finances for further research, influenced the discipline of "history" considerably in terms of quantity during the period concerned. However, it was possible to eliminate this phenomenon thanks to the physical verification of all submitted results and their allocation on a qualitative scale.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.