Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  forensic traces
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The application of advanced methods of trace identification at a crime scene has made a substantial contribution to the identification of offenders. An accurate identification as well as preservation of forensic traces at a crime scene are key determinants of the methods’ usage. The application of appropriate forensic traces identification and preservation techniques has been presented in the paper, including selected case studies.
2
88%
EN
The aim of the paper is to present issues connected with introduction of innovative tactical and technical solutions which have an impact on the improvement of process and forensic activities conducted in criminal proceedings by investigating authorities of the Police. These innovations pertain to activities performed during forensic examination of the scene of the event. They also pertain to the work of team of experts at the scenes of the event (of specific character, e.g. crises, catastrophes, etc.) as well as to expert examination conducted in forensic laboratories. The paper also presents most recent organizational and technical solutions in forensic (both tactics and technique) aspect of conducted activities that affect detective process.
EN
A reliable dating of forensic traces revealed at the crime scenes is still one of the most challenging issues of forensic science. While there are lot of proprietary research and development methods being promoted and applied within various fields of forensic research, the issue in question remains largely unresolved and as such justifies an evaluation. As fingerprints and bloodstains are nowadays one of the most important types of forensic traces often revealed at crime scenes worldwide and utilized in practice for human identification purposes, a descriptive method has been applied to present current research paths and a potential to provide long awaited resolution of the issue in question. A review of research approaches undertaken by various forensic scientists and joint research teams leads to the conclusion a progress has been achieved through utilization of both new research concepts and application of fast evolving and advancing technologies, yet no scientifically proven ultimate solutions have been presented. This issue remains controversial and still unresolved despite numerous attempts to establish both commonly agreed and reliable markers or characteristics corresponding to a complex issue of ageing of forensic traces, as there are various internal and external factors impacting the process in question.
PL
W artykule omówiono użycie pojęcia „ślad” w profilowaniu kryminalnym. W literaturze poświęconej profilowaniu kryminalnemu pojęcie to występuje najczęściej z innymi określeniami, takimi jak: „fizyczny”, „kryminalistyczny”, „behawioralny”, „psychologiczny”. Przy czym ślady behawioralny i psychologiczny uznawane są za domenę profilerów. Niniejszy tekst przybliża czytelnikowi podziały i klasyfikacje śladów, jakie stosują osoby zajmujące się profilowaniem kryminalnym, co najczęściej rozumieją pod pojęciem śladów fizycznych i kryminalistycznych oraz w jaki sposób w profilowaniu kryminalnym definiowane są ślady behawioralne i psychologiczne. Zwraca również uwagę na fakt, że ślady behawioralne i ślady psychologiczne rozumiane są odmiennie przez różnych autorów. Ponadto zdarza się, że ten sam autor nadaje jednemu pojęciu różne znaczenia. Tymczasem brak ustalonych definicji śladów behawioralnych i śladów psychologicznych może znacznie utrudnić ocenę opinii biegłych dotyczących profilów kryminalnych sporządzanych dla celów postępowania karnego.
EN
This article addresses the use of the term „trace” for the purposes of criminal profiling. In the literature on criminal profiling, “trace” is usually associated with such terms as “physical”, “forensic”, “behavioral” and “psychological”, whereby the two latter are considered to be the domain of profilers. The aim of this article is to familiarize the reader with the classification of traces used by criminal profilers, usually consisting of physical and forensic traces, as well as the way in which behavioral and psychological traces are defined in criminal profiling. Attention is also drawn to the fact that behavioral and psychological traces are understood in a different way by various authors. Moreover, it happens that the same author gives different meanings to the same term. Meanwhile, the lack of established definitions of behavioral and psychological traces may hinder the evaluation of expert opinions concerning criminal profiles, issued for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.