The aim of this essay is to explain the significance of the Slavonic Review for the shaping and profiling of the field of historical Slavic studies. Historical Slavic studies is understood here in the sense of Slavonic studies that focus on the inception and development of the ideas of Pan-Slavism and inter- Slavic relations. At the same time, this field is complemented by the history of the field of Slavic studies itself, with which it shares many topical and methodological features. Both fields produce analytical work that is enriched with discussions of the broader contexts made possible by the more general approach.
The process of the return unit is defined as a return to the past in order to rebuild the broken bond with her and take stock of life experiences. Each return full biographical dimension, social and historical, and thus fills the internal states on the needs of biographical belonging, a common fate of Polish- Jewish. Back is sometimes understood as coercion resulting from processuality biographical life experiences, the need to balance life, consolidation of facts, calm, ordering biography, to give it meaning and significance. The need for closure biography, ie,, zatoczenia wheels, ‘’ is needed in individuals who have experienced pain, suffering ,,cracks,, ‘’ discontinuity biographical experience. Meeting and dialogue in the proceeding rapidly towards supporting the development of social self-esteem and self-awareness unit and the identification of a common intercultural communication capabilities
This analytical study discusses the interest among Czech historians who research Russian history spanning from its earliest periods to 1917. It is a case study that demonstrates this interest in the example of the periodical the Slavonic Review. Part of this study is an analysis of the tradition of Czech (Czechoslovak) research into Russian history and the historians’ confrontations on the pages of the Slavonic Review. The work treats the topical and methodological transformations in the research chronologically, and pays tribute to the significant personalities who published historical Russian studies work in this periodical.
Based on twenty interviews with the representatives of a specific memory group, Bohemia’s and Moravia’s nobility, their memories of the period of World War II and the Nazi era are described. The author shows that a remembrance is not only a mere expression of personal experiences, as often believed in oral history, but that it constitutes a complicated fabric in which individual memory, often unconsciously, is subject to the current predominant cultural scripts. Hence, the memories of nobles exhibit some identical narrative patterns, typical of the nobility of Bohemia and Moravia as a social group, mostly irrespective of their nationality.
The article is devoted to the problem of the contemporary approaches to formation of the skills to analyze the characters of historical pieces of literature of the future philologist-teachers. The author notes that the deepening of professional training teachers in modern conditions of society related activities aimed at improving theeducational process, finding new methods of training focused on the formation of the creative personality of the future teacher of his own abilities and skills to acquire knowledge for their personal professional, intellectual and cultural growth. Art canvas Ukrainian writers of historical subjects, which provide significant scientific and educational opportunities, take one of the leading places in this paper. The study of current practices shows that most teachers of Ukrainian literature have insufficient examination of the content and the method of analysis of images of historical characters work. This is manifested in an incomplete account of the general pedagogical principles and methods, specific approaches to the analysis. In particular, the teachers of literature do not always understand the originality of the work on image-historical character, not sufficiently aware of the results available, even small, scientific studies of that problem. This unresolved problems raised in the curriculum of higher educational institutions, literary, manuals, insufficient teacher training methodology to analyze images and characters of literature with historical themes determine the relevance of this article. Attention is focused on the current approaches to the study of literature of historical subjects, as independent creative tasks and work in the formation of skills of historical analysis of the images, the characters in the educational process. The author has proposed the samples of the problem-creative tasks to work on the formation of skills of historical analysis of the images, the characters of U.Karmalyuk and I. Mazepa in the M. Starytsky’s novels «Razboynyk Karmelyuk» and «Youth of Mazepa» and «Desolation», the implementation of which requires the students knowledge features of the era, texts, abilities to search, collect, organize and analyze the material in accordance with the directions of the structure and taking into account the historical, human, national and historical-functional aspects.
This article is trying to bring insight into the historical development of protection of nature, especially forests, animals and birds in the course of history on the territories of the countries, because of the need for environmental protection, which is the basis of environmental policy, as it is perceived today, found itself a reflection of the decisions and actions of individual countries and regions, resp. their rulers back over the centuries, resp. millennia, while individual decisions, do not have the sophisticated nature of law now, but connects them with the current need to protect nature and its various sub-components
Ilarion (Ivan Ohienko) published in his Canadian periodical Faith and Culture (1953–1967) as well as his reviews of new books in literature studies and fiction published in continental Ukraine. Bishop Ilarion’s literary reviews and assessments can be divided into two groups: 1) assessments and commentaries of works on new Ukrainian literature studies (‘pre-October’) and 2) new (‘Soviet’). The first group includes critical reviews of scientific research works of M.D. Bernstein, M.N. Komyshachenko whose methodological foundations (Marxist-Leninist) he couldn’t accept. Many materials on the pages of Faith and Culture are dedicated to individual figures of Ukrainian literary process of the new period. Among them is his linguistic and literary research work Marko Vovchok’s language, commentaries to I. Franko’s articles which appeared in continental Ukraine to mark his centennial (1956), articles about А. Chaikovskiy, materials about Nataleta Koroleva, B-I. Antonych etc. Bishop Ilarion paid less attention to works of Ukrainian literarure scholars dedicated to works by Soviet writers. He didn’t like their Communist ideological bias. This was reflected in his assessment of works by M. Syrotiuk Ukrainian historical prose (1958), collection of papers Soviet literature studies. N1 (1959) etc. Ivan Ohienko also paid attention to works of fiction in Ukraine. He considers such works as Атестат зрілості by V. Kozachenko, Світанок над морем by J. Smolych, Данило Галицький by A. Hyzhniak to be the model of communist ideology. Different tonality and style characterize Bishop Ilarion’s literal and critical reviews of works by Ukrainian diaspora representatives. The reviews do not contain any ironical implicatures, direct criticism, ideological non-acceptance. Among highly praised works are those by P. Zajtzev Життя Тараса Шевченка (1955), J. Slavutych Іван Франко і Росія (1959) etc. Ohienko as a critic also pays attention to works by famous diaspora writers D. Humenna, I. Bahriannuj, U. Samchuk, H. Zhurba etc. Bishop Ilarion (Ivan Ohienko), who was limited within his scientific research and was denied a professor’s position, succeeded in combining his religious ministration and science. As a student and representative of historical and philological school of V. Peretz and the author of numerous philological studies, I. Ohienko symbolized the objective, free of political bias, ethical and profound criticism.
The novels “Antichrist” by D. Merezhkovsky, “Petersburg” by A. Biely and “Evenings with Peter the Great” by D. Granin were chosen to be analyzed because they are less well described in this aspect. The novels are studied in the context of the appraisals of the role and personality of the man who created The Russian Empire. The creation of the artistic image of Peter the First has to do with the problem of fictitiousness and historic authenticity. In the twentieth century the literary image of the tzar-reformer is devoid of being idealized and loses its apologetic pathos. The creation of the true to life image of the real great man that required a deeper understanding of Peter the statesman and Peter the man turned out to be a difficult task.
Artykuł inspiruje się projektem Mieke Bal o wędrujących pojęciach, którego geneza tkwi w refleksji nad międzydyscyplinarnymi nieporozumieniami w dyskusjach i nauczaniu akademickim. Podejście Bal jest tu porównane z przedsięwzięciem polskiego naukowca, Antoniego B. Dobrowolskiego, który planując założenie archiwum materiałów do badania twórczości (1927), chciał poprawić jakość nauczania w polskich szkołach. Podczas gdy celem Bal było rozjaśnienie intersubiektywnego potencjału pojęć, to Dobrowolski zachęcał naukowców do spisywania biografii własnego procesu twórczego. Niepowodzenie projektu Dobrowolskiego zostaje tu dodatkowo przeanalizowane w ujęciu historycznym poprzez zestawienie z niemieckim opracowaniem tekstów biograficznych wielkich uczonych pod redakcją m.in. Raymunda Schmidta.
EN
This essay follows Mieke Bal’s narrative on travelling concepts stemming from failures in interdisciplinary communication in academic discussion and teaching. Her approach is compared to Polish scientist Antoni B. Dobrowolski’s project of an archive of biographies of creative thought (1927) that aimed to solve specific problems in the Polish educational system. Whereas Bal sheds light on the intersubjective potential of concepts, Dobrowolski aimed to question scholars to get insight into the thickets of thought. Both initiatives for stronger academic introspection are compared and the latter’s failure is examined against its historical background, namely a general tendency of self-optimization, represented by a German collection of autobiographical texts by great scholars edited by Raymund Schmidt and others.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.