Search results

1

Królestwo i królowanie według Księgi Apokalipsy

100%

Kiejza A.

The Biblical Annals

|

2001

|

vol. 48

|

issue 1

145-157

PL

Sostantivo basileia, presente nella proclamazione di Gesù sotto forma basileia tou Theou, oppure basileia ton ouranon, esprime piuttosto una realtà personale di Dio e di Gesu, e non soltanto geografica. Spesso siamo tentati di pensare piu a questa ultima. Nel libro dell'Apocalisse il regno apartiene a Dio a Christo (Ap 11, 15; 12; 10). Tutto quello che si svolge nella storia umana non e altro che realizzazione del Loro potere regale. C’e un’altro regno, che puó essere chiamato un «anti-regno», quello di Bestia (Ap 16, 10; 11, 17. 18). Ma anche i cristiani sono chiamati basileia (Ap 1, 6; 5, 10; Ap 20, 6 esprime lo stesso ma nella forma verbale). Il loro essere «regno» e uno stato strettamente legato a Dio e a Cristo. Questo e avvenuto grazie alla morte violenta di Gesù (Ap 1, 5; 5, 9). La loro dignità è „indirizzata” a Dio e ora si esprime nella missione che svolgono sulla terra (Ap 20, 6). Finalmente, nella realtà escatologica, loro avranno parte in una piena realizzazione di quello che già stanno sperimantando. Questo articolo cerca di provare che per i cristiani „essere regno”, nel contesto della storia, è un compito da svolgere e non una dignita da godere. II ció si attua nella tensione tra opposizione alla Bestia a tra stretto legame a Dio e a Cristo.

2

THE IDEA OF MAN AND DIVINITY IN ANTIQUITY PART II: Μέγιστον τῶν μετὰ Ἀλέξανδρον διαδεξαμένων τὴν ἀρχὴν βασιλέα: Arrian’s Judgment of Seleucus I Nicator (Anab. 7. 22. 5)

88%

Burliga B.

Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica

|

2014

|

vol. 15(4)

PL

The article deals with Arrian of Nicomedia’s high estimation of the king Seleucus (calledNicator), a former officer in Alexander the Great’s army. Seleucus had created the greatest– second to Alexander, in fact – empire and this is the main criterion by which he isappreciated by the Bithynian historian and philosopher. It is the same criterion that Arrianhad adopted in evaluating Alexander’s achievements. ‘Greatness’ constituted thus, to putit briefly, an old measure by which kings, commanders and eminent men were rated byGreek historians.

3

Rola króla w Izraelu w stosunku do ojcostwa Boga i do społeczeństwa w kontekście starożytnego Bliskiego Wschodu

88%

Waszak P.

Verbum Vitae

|

2011

|

vol. 20

43-58

EN

The understanding of the origins, functions and duties of a monarchy in the ancient world was influenced by religious beliefs current at that time. This „theology” fundamentally impinged on the establishment of the concept and the character of „royal paternity” having previously determined the relations between the king himself and the supernatural world. According to biblical sources, at the time when Israel was a monarchy, it is possible to state that there was a specific awareness of the role of the king that consisted in stipulating the covenant between the nation and God. This demanding and charismatic model has been embodied and realised not until the moment when Messiah – the King who perfectly revealed God’s fatherhood

PL

Rozumienie źródła, funkcji i obowiązków monarchii w starożytnym świecie pozostaje pod wpływem wierzeń religijnych tamtych czasów. Ta "teologia" zasadniczo rzutowała na koncpecję i charakter "królewskiego ojcostwa" determinując uprzednio relację między samym królem i światem nadprzyrodzonym. Wg źródeł biblijnych w czasie, gdy Izrael był minarchią, możliwe jest stwierdzenie istnienia specyficznej świadomości o roli króla w przymierzu zawartym między ludem i Bogiem. Ten wymagający i charyzmatyczny model ucieleśni się i zrelaizuje nie wcześniej niż z Mesjaszem-Królem, który w doskonały sposób objawi ojcostwo Boga.

4

The Problems of Notions in Eschatology

75%

Smentek I.

Teologia w Polsce

|

2020

|

vol. 14

|

issue 1

197-227

EN

The present article deals with the use and understanding of eschatological terminology. The concepts used and the starting point of the consideration affect its orientation and the distribution of aspects. If we take the “final events” as a starting point, we obtain an anthropological picture of man’s fate and his destiny to eternity. When starting with the mystery of God and His plan, one must pay attention to the Person of Christ the Coming One and this makes eschatology a treatise on the Triune God that completes His work. This study also draws attention to the semantic nuances of some notions relating to eternal life, such as novelty, kingdom, Father’s house, heaven, glory or eternal happiness. These and other expressions contain a wealth of meaning rooted in Revelation and the Church’s tradition. Their thoughtful and conscious use serves the purpose of a deep and creative and at the same time precise reflection.

5

Struktura i treść krótszej wersji modlitwy „Ojcze nasz” (Łk 11,2b-4)

63%

Flis J.

Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana

|

2013

|

issue 2

21-41

EN

The article was to present the content and structure of the Lord‘s Prayer in the version that was in Lk. When entering text, are shown in “mimic” the statement three versions that are found in the most ancient Christian tradition: Lk 11,2 b–4, Mt 11,9 b–13 and the Didache 8.2, first in the original language , then the faithful translation into Polish. Next discusses the structure and content of the so-called shorter version of Luke. It was first two retro-translation into Aramaic (E. Lohmeyer, G. Schwarz) that are using the right meaning of the message of the Lord‘s Prayer. Luke‘s version begins with a oneword invocation Pa,ter, which is equivalent to the Aramaic aB;)a;) and the best equivalent in Polish would be Daddy. After the invocation followed five requests (number commonly found in the ancient East and the Bible). The first two requests, the synthetic parallelism, you can specify the theological and anthropological next three ecclesial. The subject of the first wishes praying are: holiness of God and the realization of the kingdom of God. The subject of the second portion is: broadly defined daily bread for God’s forgiveness and forgive all victory in temptation. God is not tempted to do evil, but it can prevent temptation as an experience. Tempter is the devil – the enemy of God and man.

6

Z problematyki pojęć eschatologicznych

63%

Smentek I.

Teologiczne Studia Siedleckie

|

2021

|

issue Teologiczne Studia Siedleckie XVIII (2021) 18

60-91

PL

Niniejszy artykuł podejmuje temat stosowania terminologii eschatologicznej i jej rozu-mienia. Zastosowane pojęcia i punkt wyjścia prowadzonego rozważania wpływają na jego ukierunkowanie i rozłożenie aspektów. Jeśli jako punt wyjścia przyjmiemy rzeczy ostateczne uzyskamy antropologiczny obraz losów człowieka i jego powołania do wieczności. Wyjście od tajemnicy Boga i Jego planu, wymaga zwrócenia uwagi na Osobę Chrystusa Przychodzą-cego i czyni eschatologię traktatem o Bogu Trójjedynym dopełniającym swoje dzieło. Niniejsze studium zwraca też uwagę na niuanse znaczeniowe niektórych pojęć odno-szących się do życia wiecznego jak np. nowość, królestwo, dom Ojca, niebo, chwała czy szczęście wieczne. Te i inne wyrażenia zawierają, zakorzenione w Objawieniu i tradycji Kościoła, bogactwo znaczeniowe. Ich przemyślane i świadome stosowanie służy pogłębionej i twórczej, a zarazem precyzyjnej refleksji.

EN

The present article deals with the use and understanding of eschatological terminology. The concepts used and the starting point of the consideration affect its orientation and the distribution of aspects. If we take the final events as a starting point, we obtain an anthropological picture of man’s fate and his destiny to eternity. When starting with the mystery of God and His plan, one must pay attention to the Person of Christ the Coming One and this makes eschatology a treatise on the Triune God that completes His work. This study also draws attention to the semantic nuances of some notions relating to eternal life, such as novelty, kingdom, Father’s house, heaven, glory or eternal happiness. These and other expressions contain a wealth of meaning rooted in Revelation and the Church’s tradition. Their thoughtful and conscious use serves the purpose of a deep and creative and at the same time precise reflection.

7

Królestwo mesjańskie w nauczaniu proroków

63%

Homerski J.

The Biblical Annals

|

1964

|

vol. 11

|

issue 1

39-56

PL

Królestwo mesjańskie w nauczaniu proroków

8

Nieprecyzyjne koncepcje misjologiczne jako jedna z możliwych przyczyn współczesnego kryzysu misji na podstawie wybranych dokumentów pastoralnych

51%

Sokołowski P. A.

Studia Gdańskie

|

2010

|

issue 27

75-90

PL

W artykule zaprezentowano negatywny wpływ niektórych koncepcji misjologicznych na kryzys misji na przykładzie wybranych dokumentów z Ameryki łacińskiej. Pierwsze niebezpieczeństwo związane jest z manipulacją samym pojęciem misja oraz używaniem niesprecyzowanych, obciążonych ideologicznie, pojęć pluri‑ i multikulturowość. Kolejnym niebezpieczeństwem jest autonomizacja dialogu i pluralizmu religijnego, co wiąże się z przewartościowaniem biblijnego pojęcia Królestwa Bożego. Ostatnie niebezpieczeństwo wynika z nadreprezentacji takich terminów, jak ubodzy, peryferia i ekologia. Na zakończenie ukazuje się wagę dialogu wewnątrzkościelnego i stosowania norm inkulturacji.

XX

The paper is a reflection over the influence of some modern missiological concepts on the crisis of the missionary activity. The negation of the definition of the mission from the Ad gentes, 6 and its substitution coined by different authors. These ideas are introduced into the theological reflection usually by pastoral documents. As an example is used 2 of them, prepared by the theologians from Latin America. The author of the paper does not condemn them at all, but shows some dangers which can guide in opposite direction than the indicated by the teaching of the Church. The first of those dangers is the manipulation on the notion of the mission until the possibility to separate the mission from God. The second danger consist in the use of the notions of pluri‑ and multiculturalism, conditioned by some ideological concepts. Another danger is the over‑use of the notion of the religious pluralism and the dialogue, that is strongly tied to the revaluation of the notion of the Kingdom of God into the values of the Kingdom. This issue is bound for the over‑representation in the reflection of the terms like: poor, periphery, and ecology, the meaning of which, in many cases, is alien to the tradition of the Church. At the end of his reflection the author shows the importance of the intra‑ecclesial dialogue and the necessity of the correct application of the principles of the inculturation.

9

The Problems of Notions in Eschatology

51%

Smentek I.

Teologia w Polsce

|

2020

|

vol. 14

|

issue 1

197-227

PL

Niniejszy artykuł podejmuje temat stosowania terminologii eschatologicznej i jej rozumienia. Zastosowane pojęcia i punkt wyjścia prowadzonego rozważania wpływają na jego ukierunkowanie i rozłożenie aspektów. Jeśli jako punkt wyjścia przyjmiemy „rzeczy ostateczne” uzyskamy antropologiczny obraz losów człowieka i jego powołania do wieczności. Wyjście od tajemnicy Boga i Jego planu wymaga zwrócenia uwagi na Osobę Chrystusa Przychodzącego i czyni eschatologię traktatem o Bogu Trójjedynym, dopełniającym swoje dzieło. Niniejsze studium zwraca też uwagę na niuanse znaczeniowe niektórych pojęć odnoszących się do życia wiecznego, jak np. nowość, królestwo, dom Ojca, niebo, chwała czy szczęście wieczne. Te i inne wyrażenia zawierają, zakorzenione w Objawieniu i tradycji Kościoła, bogactwo znaczeniowe. Ich przemyślane i świadome stosowanie służy pogłębionej i twórczej, a zarazem precyzyjnej refleksji.

EN

The present article deals with the use and understanding of eschatological terminology. The concepts used and the starting point of the consideration affect its orientation and the distribution of aspects. If we take the “final events” asa starting point, we obtain an anthropological picture of man’s fate and his destiny to eternity. When starting with the mystery of God and His plan, one must pay attention to the Person of Christ the Coming One and this makes eschatology a treatise on the Triune God that completes His work.This study also draws attention to the semantic nuances of some notions relating to eternal life, such as novelty, kingdom, Father’s house, heaven, glory or eternal happiness. These and other expressions contain a wealth of meaning rooted in Revelation and the Church’s tradition. Their thoughtful and conscious use serves the purpose of a deep and creative and at the same time precise reflection.

10

Karel IV. a čeština

51%

Hasil J.

Studie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguistics

|

2017

|

vol. 8

|

issue Zvláštní číslo 2017

23-33

EN

The text focuses on different aspects of the relation of Charles IV of Luxembourg, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Bohemia, to the Czech language and other languages. As is well known, Charles IV mastered German, Czech, French, Italian and Latin, in both oral and written forms. He was also the author of many literary works (autobiography, legend, parts of chronicles, legal literature). In the Golden Bull (the constitution of the Holy Roman Empire), Charles IV set the Czech language as one of the three official languages of the Empire (together with German and Italian), promoted literature written in Czech and initiated the creation of Klaretovy slovníky. He sponsored the foundation of the Emmaus Monastery in Prague and its scriptorium, where numerous texts in Old Slavonic were created.

11

Problem odpowiedzialności w ujęciu biblijnym

38%

Jelonek T. B.

Studia Socialia Cracoviensia

|

2012

|

vol. 4

|

issue 1

EN

Description of the man creation and following after it description of the fall shows that the man is the ethical creature and is subject to a moral rights. It arises the responsibility. The crime is subject to the punishment, and obedience will be awarded. In the history of the biblical revelation comes first of all the notion of the collective responsibility which loses its part of the translation of events experienced by the nation in the voice first it Babylonian constrains. Then comes to the voice the notion of the personal responsibility which lets every individual participate in supporting the religious relation to the God but it gives also a serious difficulties. The Book of Job undertakes the problem of the suffering fair, the Book of Kohelet the question, why unfair does not bear punishment. The fuller possible solution is just after understanding that the repayment does not end within the earthly life, but there is the place for it in the hereafter life. It becomes the call to undertaking responsibility connected with the hope full of the responsibility.

12

Pluralistyczno-relatywistyczny model chrystologii Paula Knittera

32%

Romaszko-Banaś M.

Roczniki Teologii Fundamentalnej i Religiologii

|

2013

|

vol. 5

157-177

EN

Pluralistic theology of religion is getting more and more popular in Poland. This kind of theology deals with such questions as: Are all religions equal? Does Christianity surpass all these religions? Is there any way to state clearly how one should relate to Jesus Christ today' word that strikes a balance between these two extremes? No set of questions concerns Christian theologians more today. No questions have more practical relevance in the religiously most pluralistic country in the world. No American theologian has kept these questions on the theological agenda over the past three decades with more consistency than Paul Knitter. And none is more expert in his or her knowledge of the field. He is the chief disseminator of these views. Paul F. Knitter is Paul Tillich Professor of Theology, World Religions and Culture at Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York He was formerly Emeritus Professor of Theology at Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio. He is a leading theologian of religious pluralism. He holds a licentiate in theology from the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome (1966) and a doctorate from the University of Marburg, Germany (1972). Knitter's journey into interreligious dialogue began in 1964 when he was a seminarian in Rome and experienced the Second Vatican Council firsthand, at a time when the Roman Catholic Church declared its new attitude towards other religions. Since publishing his acclaimed book, No Other Name? (1985), Knitter has been widely known for his religious pluralism. Along with his friend and colleague, the Protestant philosopher of religion John Hick, Knitter has come under harsh criticism from Cardinal Ratzinger (presently the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church). Knitter is against using absolutist language to depict the Saviour in interreligious dialogue, and writes about the relational understanding of the uniqueness of Jesus: the Saviour is to be understood in relation to other saviours. Although Jesus is truly the Word of God, Knitter states that he is not the only word: he is God's universal, decisive and indispensable manifestation of saving truth and grace. According to Knitter, the creed and other Christian dogmas concerning Jesus are to be interpreted symbolically as expressions of the church's experience of Christ. Here Knitter's insight is contrary to the traditional church's teaching on Jesus as far as it has an ontological foundation. Knitter's teaching about the relational uniqueness of Jesus is naturally unacceptable to bishops, because it alters the way the faith is proclaimed and it also deviates from what is central to Christianity.

Refine search results

Królestwo i królowanie według Księgi Apokalipsy

THE IDEA OF MAN AND DIVINITY IN ANTIQUITY PART II: Μέγιστον τῶν μετὰ Ἀλέξανδρον διαδεξαμένων τὴν ἀρχὴν βασιλέα: Arrian’s Judgment of Seleucus I Nicator (Anab. 7. 22. 5)

Rola króla w Izraelu w stosunku do ojcostwa Boga i do społeczeństwa w kontekście starożytnego Bliskiego Wschodu

The Problems of Notions in Eschatology

Struktura i treść krótszej wersji modlitwy „Ojcze nasz” (Łk 11,2b-4)

Z problematyki pojęć eschatologicznych

Królestwo mesjańskie w nauczaniu proroków

Nieprecyzyjne koncepcje misjologiczne jako jedna z możliwych przyczyn współczesnego kryzysu misji na podstawie wybranych dokumentów pastoralnych

The Problems of Notions in Eschatology

Karel IV. a čeština

Problem odpowiedzialności w ujęciu biblijnym

Pluralistyczno-relatywistyczny model chrystologii Paula Knittera