Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Kontrola Państwowa

  2. 1 Przegląd Sejmowy

Authors help

  1. 2 Murat L.

Years help

  1. 1 2019

  2. 1 2016

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  lawfulness of audit
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Stosunek kontrolnoprawny –relacje prawne między kontrolującymi a kontrolowanymi

100%
Murat L.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2016
|
vol. 61
|
issue 3 (368)
8-21
EN
To date, in audit studies the issue of legal relations between audit bodies and auditees has been discussed without differentiating the legal relation characteristic of auditing. Meanwhile, the President of NIK has several times emphasised the specificity of the relations between the Supreme Audit Office and its auditees. In response to complaints against NIK judged by administrative courts (in 2009 and in 2011), the President of NIK postulated to reject them as unacceptable, stating that “the cognition of the administrative court does not apply to the NIK audit activity, because the legal relation between NIK and an audited entity is not of administrative nature”. In his article, the author attempts to rationalise the stance of the NIK President by considering if, in the current state of the audit studies development, it is possible to differentiate the legal status related to auditing, and, if so, what its main characteristics are.
2
Content available remote

Naczelność Najwyższej Izby Kontroli

84%
Murat L.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2019
|
issue 3(152)
61–79
EN
The Constitution provides that the Supreme Audit Office (NIK) is the primary state audit institution. The profoundness of its “primacy” still awaits to be discovered. Legal scholars have not yet examined the meaning and the possible consequences of this attribute thoroughly enough. In the article this gap is filled by arguing that “primacy” shall be understood as the constitutional mission of NIK to safeguard the lawfulness of auditing. In particular, it entitles NIK to intensify efforts to secure the coherent interpretation of law by all auditing institutions. More uniform understanding of legal provisions may contribute to the increase of the overall stability of law, as the pressure on the parliament to explain its ambiguous laws by numerous amendments would eventually ease.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.