Search results

1

Oboczność ir // er (≤ *ŕ̥) w Księgach o gospodarstwie (Kraków 1549, Helena Unglerowa)

100%

Osiewicz M.

Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza

|

2015

|

vol. 22

|

issue 2

103-128

PL

This article is a continuation of research into the textual differentiation of the distribution of the variant phonetic forms in Księgi o gospodarstwie by Piotr Krescentyn of 1549. The analysis includes forms with the ir // er (≤ *ŕ̥) groups. While the diversity of the textual distribution of the surveyed forms pertains to only six roots: -ḿ_řv-, -v́_řb-, -ṕ_rv-, -č_rń, -tv́_rʒ-, -v́_řx-, it is quite considerable as it encompasses 10 textual areas coinciding with the text segmentation typical of previous (graphic and phonetic) analyses. Three text layers indicate the typesetter’s intervention. As for the analysed form, the part containing the 381a–R10v quarts was the most standardised chunk of the text; it is also quite conservative with respect to the solutions in the area analysed. The analysis also demonstrates that the demarcation line between the Q and R quarts, as indicated by Kazimierz Piekarski on the basis of a typographic analysis, coincides with the demarcation line of phonetic phenomena.

2

Oboczność mię cię się // mie cie sie w Księgach o gospodarstwie Piotra Krescentyna z 1549 roku

100%

Osiewicz M.

Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza

|

2013

|

vol. 20

|

issue 1

127-148

PL

The goal of this article is to provide a detailed description of the mię cię się // mie cie sie alternation as presented in Księgi o gospodarstwie from 1549. In the analysis, four aspects have been taken into consideration: 1) the alternation’s position range, 2) the textual lack of continuity of the alternation’s state, 3) identification of the extent to which a compositor affected a text, 4) the extent of normalization of the mię cię się // mie cie sie opposition in all identified parts of the text against the background of other texts from the time under scrutiny. In the text, the variants were reflected only in the forms of the się reflexive pronoun. A majority of the text is evidence of a status typical of Krakow prints from the first half of the 16th century referred to as the Lesser Poland standard: a verb + sie, a preposition + się. A different status is confirmed in the initial columns of the book: adjacent to a verb – columns 113–248, following the w, przed, na and nad prepositions – columns 48–78, following the za preposition – columns 1–112. This alternation is most diversified with respect to the text when it accompanies a verb. The distribution of modes of marking the forms of the reflexive pronoun provides evidence that this phenomenon could be affected by the compositor.

3

Wariantywność (orto)graficzna pożyczek angielskich w świetle normatywistyki języka rosyjskiego

100%

Romanik A.

Studia Rossica Posnaniensia

|

2019

|

vol. 44

|

issue 2

347-358

PL

The article focuses on the problem of orthographic and graphic variants of English loanwords in modern Russian. The empirical material was excerpted from normative dictionaries and Russian glossy magazines. The main purpose of the studies was to define the reasons for different notation of anglicisms, to illustrate the types of orthographic and graphic variants, and also to indicate the most important issues of loanword codification in normative practice. Variation in writing is a dynamic phenomenon in Russian (ortho) graphy that requires lexicographical description as there are no separate rules of notation for loanwords.

Refine search results

2 Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza

1 Studia Rossica Posnaniensia

2 Osiewicz M.

1 Romanik A.

1 2019

1 2015

1 2013

Oboczność ir // er (≤ *ŕ̥) w Księgach o gospodarstwie (Kraków 1549, Helena Unglerowa)

Oboczność mię cię się // mie cie sie w Księgach o gospodarstwie Piotra Krescentyna z 1549 roku

Wariantywność (orto)graficzna pożyczek angielskich w świetle normatywistyki języka rosyjskiego