Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  media reception
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article undertakes the issue of the sources from which we obtain our knowledge and shape our opinions on the topic of the secular state. Based on a questionnaire survey on a representative group of Poles, I point to the constitutive role of the media in this process. However, I specify that the preferred sources of information are first of all television and then the Internet. Next, I translate the results of the quantitative analysis onto Neuberger’s (1999) approach to the Church-state relationship. As a result, I point out that the opinions of the respondents are located in the endorsed Church space. At the same time, I argue that in this type of approach to Church-state relations, respondents more often perceive the pressure of the Catholic Church in relation to state authority than vice versa.
EN
The fourth question in Lasswell’s model (to whom?) assumes a study and an analysis of media’s publicity and broader reception of the content. This reception should go personally or socially. The personal contexts include amongst others lifecycle and physical and mental limitations. The age plays an important role in media reception. The youth watches less television than the older people, who, on the contrary, are less likely to use electronic forms of communication. Another pattern here is that the older the man is, the longer he reads newspapers and magazines during the day. Important limitations in media reception are due to physical obstacles such as: poor sight and impaired hearing whereas the most significant mental obstacle is depression. The article presents also the problems of reception in a group, that is, when a person watches television or listens to the radio accompanied by other people. The presence of the others modifies all the process, there is a possibility of conversation and commenting the content. A spectacular example of reception in the group is watching football matches. Media can also be received in public space, open for everyone. Nowadays, public spaces are characterized by - as called by the scientists - a communication tyranny. Phone conversations are omnipresent and disturbs everybody. This is a kind of psychological pathology. Media reception depends on the culture, both personal and in a general sense. In Europe, there are differences between North and South that can be explained, among others, by religious factors (Protestantism vs. Catholicism). In the article- as practice shows – we mentioned main German studies, but also in a lesser extent - American and Polish ones. All of them relate to a more general problem of mediatisation and everyday life.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy problematyki trafności argumentacji etycznej zastosowanej w oświadczeniach kościelnych na temat szczepień przeciw koronawirusowi. Chodzi o dokumenty wydane w tej kwestii przez Kongregację Nauki Wiary, Komisję Konferencji Episkopatów Unii Europejskiej (COMECE/CEC) oraz Konferencję Episkopatu Niemiec. Problematyka została wyjaśniona w trzech punktach. Na początku zostały przedstawione linie argumentacyjne zawarte w wydanych oświadczeniach. Zasadniczo nawiązują one do pojęcia dobra wspólnego, solidarności oraz teologicznego ujęcia miłości rozumianej w sensie troski (care). W dalszej kolejności argumentacje zostały poddane krytyce. Krytycznie ujmując, w szczegółowych aspektach można podanym racjom postawić zarzuty: słabej reprezentatywności, słabego wyjaśnienia oraz słabej złożoności. Na końcu tekst formuje impulsy podpowiadające, jak w przyszłości oświadczenia tego typu mogłyby być formułowane w sposób bardziej udany.
EN
The text examines the suitability of the ethical argumentations of church statements on the COVID-19 vaccination. More precisely, statements of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the COMECE/CEC and the DBK.The qualitative evaluation of these statements is carried out in three steps: First, the ethical argumentation lines are elaborated. They refer centrally to the concept of the common good, solidarity, and a theologically charged concept of care-love. In the second step, the lines of argumentation are subjected to a critique, which reveals that they can be accused of “underrepresentation”, “underexposure” and “lack of complexity” in individual traits. In the third step indications are given as to how such statements could be formulated more successfully in the future.
DE
Der Text befasst sich mit der Gelungenheit der ethischen Argumentationen kirchlicher Statements zur Coronaschutzimpfung. Genauer hin dem der Glaubenskongregation, der COMECE/CEC und der DBK. Um seiner Frage nachzugehen, geht der Text in drei Schritten vor: Zunächst werden die ethischen Argumentationslinien der Statements herausgearbeitet. Diese beziehen sich zentral auf den Gemeinwohl-, Solidaritäts-, und einen theologisch-aufgeladenen Care-Liebesbegriff. Im zweiten Schritt werden die Argumentationslinien einer Kritik unterzogen. Diese zeigt auf, dass ihnen in einzelnen Zügen eine „Unterrepräsentation“, „Unterbelichtung“ und „Unterkomplexität“ vorgeworfen werden kann. Im dritten Schritt wird ein Impuls gegeben, wie Statements solcher Art in Zukunft gelingender formuliert werden könnten.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.