Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  multilingual law
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Acercamiento a la (no)equivalencia de los términos jurídicos en los diccionarios bilingües polaco-español/español-polaco

100%
Jaskot M. P., Wiltos A.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2016
|
vol. 43
|
issue 3
37-51
EN
The new European legal context prompted the creation of an original terminology within the existing Polish and Spanish legal language. As far as legal translation and the methods used in the specialized translation are concerned, it is crucial to remember that the law as science and a culture element of each nation has its own language. One of the most effective and essential tools in the work of each legal translator are bilingual dictionaries. Notwithstanding, lexicographical resources, which should support the translator, often lack adequate equivalent. That is why, conducting studies based on the Polish-Spanish and Spanish-Polish bilingual dictionaries in the context of linguistic analysis of lexical equivalents seems reasonable. The article approaches the phenomenon of equivalence or the lack of equivalence of selected lexical units in the legal field in order to demonstrate existing tools within general or specialized dictionaries available to – in our particular case – Polish translators whose working language is Spanish.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AS AN INTERPRETATIVE TOOL IN UNI- AND MULTINLINGUAL LEGAL SYSTEMS (BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF POLAND AND THE UE)

73%
PALUSZEK K., BIELSKA-BRODZIAK A.
Comparative Legilinguistics
|
2018
|
vol. 34
7-32
PL
Celem pracy jest analiza i porównanie interpretacyjnego znaczenia historii legislacyjnej w działalności orzeczniczej Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości i sądów polskich.Autorki analizują orzeczenia sądów, koncentrując się na roli historii legislacyjnej w używanej przez sądy argumentacji. W doktrynie polskiej i europejskiej użyteczność travaux preparatoires nie jest dostatecznie doceniana. Niemniej jednak historia legislacyjna może dostarczyć w procesie wykładni tekstu prawnego istotnych argumentów i to zarówno w jednojęzycznych, jak i wielojęzycznych systemach prawnych. Jednak jej znaczenie i funkcje w obu badanych jurysdykcjach są odmienne. Przeprowadzone badania pozwalają na lepsze zrozumienie wartości interpretacyjnej materiałów legislacyjnych w interpretacji prawniczej i mogą przyczynić się do zwiększenia użyć tego narzędzia w działalności sądowej sądów krajowych i europejskich.
EN
The paper aims to analyse and compare the interpretative function of legislative history in the judicial activity of the European Court of Justice and Polish courts.  The authors have analysed judgments of the respective courts, focusing on the role of legislative history in their argumentation. In the Polish and European doctrine, the usefulness of travaux preparatoires has been underestimated. Nevertheless, legislative history may provide arguments important in judicial reasoning both in uni- and multilingual legal systems. However, its importance and functions in Polish and European cases examined herein are different. The research conducted enables a better understanding of the interpretative value of legislative history in legal interpretation and can result in more frequent use of this tool in the judicial activity of national and European courts.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

List of Reviewers

58%
EDITORIAL OFFICE c.
Comparative Legilinguistics
|
2017
|
vol. 32
147-147
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.