Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  needlestick injuries
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Objectives To analyze the number, epidemiology and circumstances of needlestick and sharps injuries (NSSI) and exposures to body fluids and to identify further preventive measures to improve the occupational safety of health care workers (HCW). Material and Methods Setting: German university tertiary-care referral center. Retrospective study based on injury documentation sheets of the hospital’s staff and faculty health service and, if given, on reports by continuity doctors and by the accident and emergency department in January 2014–June 2016. Results Altogether, 567 injuries were registered with a significant decrease of cases over the study period. The majority of accidents occurred in the operating theater (35%). Stress, time pressure, overstrain, carelessness and distraction were found to be the main reasons for injuries. At least 30% of the cases were preventable, mainly by wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), by proper disposal of an item and by early replacement of overfilled sharps containers (SC). In 20% of the cases involving an item, the injury was caused by a safety-engineered device (SED). Almost one-third of these injuries were attributable to an improper use of the SED. Conclusions Despite many efforts made to reduce their number, NSSI still occur. Health care workers and students should be offered regular trainings to be sensitized to this topic and to learn the appropriate use of SED. Moreover, organizational measures must be taken, such as the provision of suitable PPE and safe SC. Strategies need to be established to improve the working conditions and reduce the stress level of HCW.
EN
Objective: Sharp injuries constitute important occupational exposure in hospital environment, and perhaps the newly graduated medical and dental students, known as House Officers, in the first twelve months of their practice, are the most vulnerable of all health workers. This study was designed to examine the nature and prevalence of occupational injuries among medical and dental house officers and factors associated with reporting these injuries. Materials and Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information on demography, types of exposure, and barriers to official reporting of occupational injuries. One hundred and forty-four medical and dental house officers in 3 government owned hospitals in Edo State, Nigeria participated in the study, between April and May, 2010. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: The overall response rate was 96%. Out of all participants, 69.4% were male; 82.6% were medical house officers. Prevalence of percutaneous injury was 56.9%; where needlestick injury constituted one-third of all injuries. Mean frequency of injury was 1.86±2.24, with medicals having more injuries (p = 0.043). The ward was the most common location for the injury and 14.8% of exposures occurred as a result of lapse in concentration. At least 77.0% did not formally report their injury and perceived low injury risk was the most common reason given (51.67%). Conclusion: This study shows that a substantial number of House Officers are exposed to occupational injuries and that the majority of them does not formally report these. Safer work environment may be achieved by implementing adequate educational programs tailored specifically to house officers, and policies encouraging exposure reporting should be developed.
PL
Wstęp: Wirusowe zapalenie wątroby jest drugą najczęściej stwierdzaną zakaźną chorobą zawodową i rozpoznawaną głównie u pracowników ochrony zdrowia. Ta grupa zawodowa jest najbardziej narażona w miejscu pracy na ryzyko ekspozycji na patogeny krwiopochodne, w tym wirusy HBV i HCV. Celem badania była ocena skuteczności działań ukierunkowanych na bezpieczeństwo pracy w placówkach ochrony zdrowia, częstości incydentów ekspozycji na materiał biologiczny w ostatnich 12 miesiącach poprzedzających badanie oraz ich zgłaszalności. Materiał i metody: Do analizy użyto badania kwestionariuszowego przeprowadzonego w latach 2009-2010 wśród 1138 pracowników ochrony zdrowia. Wyniki: Ekspozycja na materiał biologiczny miała miejsce u 242 pracowników (21% całej grupy). Tylko 146 osób zgłosiło te zdarzenia odpowiednim służbom. Przypadkowe przerwanie ciągłości tkanek miało związek z postrzeganiem pracy jako obarczonej wysokim stopniem narażenia (OR = 3,69, p = 0,0027), zatrudnieniem w ambulatoryjnych (w porównaniu ze stacjonarnymi) placówkach ochrony zdrowia (OR = 1,71, p = 0,0089), przekonaniem o niewystarczającym poziomie przekazywanych przez zakład pracy informacji na temat zakażeń krwiopochodnych oraz brakiem procedur i wiedzy dotyczących raportowania ekspozycji. Wnioski: Mimo prezentowania w różnych publikacjach wytycznych dotyczących postępowania poekspozycyjnego, szczególnie w placówkach nieświadczących usług całodobowych, procedury te są nieznane bądź nieprzestrzegane. Powinien być kładziony większy nacisk na szkolenie pracowników, szczególnie w zakresie ryzyka transmisji zakażeń oraz korzyści płynących z przestrzegania procedur poekspozycyjnych i zgłaszania przypadków ekspozycji. Med. Pr. 2013;64(1):1-10
EN
Objectives: Viral hepatitis is the second most often identified infectious illness acquired at work and it is mostly registered among health care personnel. This group of workers is at greater risk of exposure to blood and bloodborne pathogens, including hepatitis B and C viruses. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of methods promoting work safety in healthcare settings, to assess the frequency of exposures in the last 12 months prior to the study and to determine a rate of reporting them to appropriate authorities. Methods: A total of 1138 Polish healthcare workers were interviewed during the study period (between 2009 and 2010). Results: Sustaining accidental occupational percutaneous exposure during last 12 months was declared by 242 workers (21% of the whole group). Only in 146 cases these incidents were reported to authorities. Exposure incidents were associated with self-perception of high risk of exposure (OR = 3.69, p = 0.0027), employment in out-patient (vs. hospital-based) healthcare setting (OR = 1.71, p = 0.0089), conviction that the level of information about bloodborne infections conveyed at work was insufficient, lack of both exposure reporting system and knowledge about the ways of reporting. Conclusions: Despite the different established proposals of the post-exposure procedures, it turns out that particularly in small, not providing 24 hours service healthcare settings these procedures are not known or are not respected. More attention should be given to education, especially in regard to the risk of infection, advantages of post-exposure prophylaxis and reporting exposure incidents. Med Pr 2013;64(1):1–10
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.