Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 88

first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  nullity of marriage
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pápeži a neplatnosť manželstva z dôvodu psychickej prirodzenosti

100%
Kakalej M.
Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne
|
2013
|
issue 2(12)
169-186
EN
The acceptance of the 1095 canon into the new Code of Canon Law in 1983 has been accompanied by relatively frequent guidelines by popes re- garding the mental causes of nullity of marriage. The Roman bishop per- forms them from his position of the supreme power in the Church, particular- ly in order to protect the Church community from being scandalized by see- ing practical destruction of the values of Christian marriage due to exagger- ated and almost automatic declaration of nullity of marriage in the event of the failure of the marriage on the pretext of immaturity or mental weakness of either spouse. The popes, particularly John Paul II. and Benedict XVI., in their homilies for the Roman Rota at the beginning of the calendar year, used to deal with the issue of mental incapacity of sacramental marriage. The aim of this thesis is therefore to analyse these pope guidelines on mental disabil- ity and to draw conclusions for practice.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Defekty wiary a nieważność małżeństwa

100%
Leszczyński G.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2022
|
vol. 32
|
issue 3
115-127
EN
Marriage is a sacrament when it is entered into between two baptized persons. Does this mean, then, that it does not really matter in what disposition a given person gets married and that the fact of practicing the faith has no meaning whatsoever in relation to the validity of a marriage? Contemporary jurisprudence quite clearly defines the sacramentality of marriage in isolation from the fact of having faith and the intention to celebrate a sacramental marriage. Of course, from a pastoral point of view, deepening the faith should be a condition for contracting marriage. Moreover, a lack of faith certainly prevents the full enjoyment of the fruits of the sacrament, which becomes an unquestionable pastoral problem. However, does the lack of faith on the part of the contractor prevent him from entering into a valid marriage and, most importantly, is it possible to exclude the sacramentality of marriage with regard to its dignity in the case of a person deprived of the grace of faith? This article is an attempt to answer these questions.
PL
Małżeństwo jest sakramentem, jeśli jest zawarte pomiędzy dwiema osobami ochrzczonymi. Czy zatem oznacza to, że tak naprawdę nie jest istotne, w jakiej dyspozycji dane osoby zawierają małżeństwo i że w ogóle fakt praktykowania wiary nie ma jakiegokolwiek znaczenia w odniesieniu do ważności zawieranego małżeństwa? Współczesne orzecznictwo dość jednoznacznie określa sakramentalność małżeństwa w oderwaniu od faktu posiadania wiary, jak i intencji celebrowania małżeństwa sakramentalnego. Oczywiście z punktu widzenia duszpasterskiego pogłębienie wiary winno być stawiane jako warunek zawarcia małżeństwa. Co więcej, brak wiary z pewnością uniemożliwia pełne korzystanie z owoców sakramentu, co staje się niewątpliwym problemem duszpasterskim. Czy jednak brak wiary po stronie kontrahenta uniemożliwia ważne zawarcie przez niego małżeństwa? Moim zdaniem nie uniemożliwia, choć nie można takiej sytuacji wykluczyć w przypadku odrzucenia godności sakramentalnej małżeństwa.
3
Content available remote

Trwałość i nierozerwalność małżeństwa w ujęciu prawa polskiego i kanonicznego

88%
Świto L.
Forum Teologiczne
|
2012
|
vol. 13
69-83
EN
Marriage is an institution, through which family as a basic cell of social life is formed, which makes it an object of interest and care for many entities, among them, the state and the Church. Concern about marriage and family shown by the state and the Church is expressed mainly in the development of appropriate legislation to guarantee the permanence of marriage and the rights of the family. However, not all marriages enjoy stability and durability. Especially recently, in our civilization and culture, one can observe more and more split marriages. This article presents the similarities and differences in regulations concerning the separation of spouses in the light of Polish law and Canon law. The analysis of separation, the declaration of nullity of canonical marriage, of the non-existence and nullity of civil marriage, civil divorce, the dissolution of an impeded canonical marriage and, due to the “privilege of faith”, leads to the conclusion, that the greatest systemic protection of the permanence and indissolubility of marriage, apart from separation, which serves the same supreme purpose in both codes of law, is provided by the Canon Law. A marriage entered into by two baptized spouses who fulfilled their wedding vows benefit from the protection of absolute indissolubility. Relative indissolubility can only be enjoyed by those marriages that have either been concluded by the unbaptized persons, or those which have not been consummated. While Polish law, despite the fact that it is based on the principle of the permanence of marriage and calls for the protection of the family founded by the spouses, allows divorces, as well as annulments of marriage once appropriate conditions are met. Thus, the protection of marriage in Polish law is defective.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Incapacitas assumendi (kan. 1095, n. 3 KPK/83) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Verginelli z 25 marca 2011 roku

75%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2022
|
vol. 33
|
issue 1
211-226
EN
The author presents and comments on the (negative) sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Verginelli of March 25, 2011, in the Plocen. case for nullity of a marriage due to incapacitas assumendi (can. 1095, n. 3 CIC/83), heard in the third instance (negative in the first instance, positive in the second); it was about the man's inability. While in the first instance, where the evidence instruction turned out to be quite extensive (testimonies of the parties, testimonies of seven witnesses, expert opinion), in the second instance it was only supplemented by an expert opinion prepared on the basis of the case files; in the rotational instance, it was confined to the material gathered so far. The legal grounds clearly show the marriage consent (actus humanus), as well as the ability to obtain it. Ponens rightly emphasized that, bearing in mind many aspects of this ability, it is above all important to relate it to serious psychological reasons that make it impossible for the subject to form a marriage consensus. In the factual grounds of the judgment, the Roman Rota assessed the evidence gathered in the first two instances. A certain drawback here was the lack of the defendant's testimony in the second instance and the failure to appear for the expert examination. Something significant was the judgment's rejection of the expert opinion (in the second instance) as inconsistent with other evidence by the rotating camp.
PL
Autor przedstawia i komentuje negatywny wyrok Roty Rzymskiej c. Verginelli z 25 marca 2011 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z powodu incapacitas assumendi po stronie mężczyzny (kan. 1095, n. 3 KPK/83), rozpoznawanej w trzeciej instancji (wyrok negatywny w pierwszej, pozytywny w drugiej). O ile w pierwszej instancji, gdzie instrukcja dowodowa okazała się dość obszerna (zeznania stron, zeznania siedmiu świadków, opinia biegłego), o tyle w drugiej instancji uzupełniono ją jedynie opinią biegłego sporządzoną na podstawie akt sprawy. Na stopniu rotalnym ograniczało się to do dotychczas zebranego materiału. Podstawa prawna wyraźnie wskazuje na zgodę małżeńską (actus humanus), a także możliwość jej wyrażenia. Ponens słusznie podkreślił, że mając na uwadze wiele aspektów tej zdolności, ważne jest przede wszystkim odniesienie jej do poważnych przyczyn psychologicznych, które uniemożliwiają podmiotowi zawarcie konsensusu małżeńskiego. W uzasadnieniu faktycznym wyroku turnus rotalny ocenił materiał dowodowy zebrany w dwóch pierwszych instancjach. Pewnym mankamentem był tu brak zeznań pozwanego w drugiej instancji oraz niestawiennictwo na badanie biegłego. Znaczącym było odrzucenie w wyroku rotalnym opinii biegłego (sporządzonej w drugiej instancji) jako niewspółbrzmiącej z innymi dowodami.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Uwarunkowania środowiskowe związku przedślubnego i małżeństwa a opiniowanie w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa przed Sądem Biskupim

75%
Cynkier P.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 2
63-88
EN
Aim of the work: Analysis of the premarital relationship with consideration of individual factors of the prospective spouses, their level of social acceptance and their influence on the image and duration of the engagement period and marriage. Evaluation of the relation between social situation of the spouses and the breakdown of marriage. Material and method:  Material included 68 cases of marriage annulment, which were proceeded by the Bishop Court in years 2007-2012. Complete court records and psychiatric-forensic examinations of complainants and defendants were analyzed. Information was coded in specially developed questionnaire, through which in systematical way the data was collected, classified, the frequency of occurrence of chosen factors was cataloged and essential correlations between them were examined by means of statistical analysis. Conclusions: The course of engagement period and decision about betrothal did not have connection with the examined environmental factors. Duration of the marriage did not have any connection with chosen material-domestic and environmental factors. Majority of couples did not dispose of own accommodation what did not result from the material situation. The younger men and women were while contracting a marriage the longer was its duration. Among the analyzed group of marriages there is no data to recognize the environmental factors, which are commonly considered to be attributable to the occurrence of mental disorders. Etiology of the disorders should be researched by expert witnesses in other spheres.
6
Content available remote

Zasada kontradyktoryjności procesu o nieważność małżeństwa na tle zasady salus animarum oraz zasady prawdy

75%
Andrzejewski M.
Kościół i Prawo
|
2019
|
issue 8 (21) nr 2
105-118
PL
W artykule ukazane zostało znaczenie zasad: salus animarum, prawdy oraz kontradyktoryjności dla procesu o nieważność małżeństwa. Z przeprowadzonej analizy wynika, iż zasada salus animarum określa nadprzyrodzony cel prawa kanonicznego, dlatego wszystkie zasady procesu o nieważność muszą być jej podporządkowane. Zasada prawdy jest kluczową zasadą procesu o nieważność małżeństwa, do poszukiwania której zobowiązani są wszyscy uczestnicy iudicium. Sposobem zaś ukazania prawdy o małżeństwie jest oparcie procesu na wartościach wynikających z zasady kontradyktoryjności.
EN
This study explores the significance of the principles of salus animarum, the truth and adversarial system for the nullity of a marriage process. The salus animarum principle defines the supernatural purpose of canon law, therefore the principles of the nullity of a marriage process must be subject to it. The principle of knowledge of truth is a key to a nullity of marriage process that all participants of iudicium are to follow. The way how to show the truth is the base of marriage process on values arising from the adversarial system.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Okoliczności dopuszczające rozpoznanie sprawy o nieważność małżeństwa w procesie skróconym przed biskupem

75%
Nowicka U.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2015
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3
43-60
EN
Article 14 § 1 Ratio procedendi ((the official explanation which accompanied the new norms Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus) sets forth the various types of cases which qualify to be instructed according to the briefer process before the Bishop according to cann. 1683-1687. Among the circumstances includes for example: the defect of faith which can generate simulation of consent or error that determines the will; a brief conjugal cohabitation; an abortion procured to avoid procreation; an obstinate persistence in an extraconjugal relationship at the time of the wedding or immediately following it; the deceitful concealment of sterility, or grave contagious illness, or children from a previous relationship, or incarcerations; a cause of marriage completely extraneous to married life, or consisting of the unexpected pregnancy of the woman, physical violence inflicted to extort consent, the defect of the use of reason which is proved by medical documents, etc. The circumstances are analyzed in this article.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus – nadzieje i obawy sądownictwa kościelnego w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Nowakowski B.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2015
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3
25-41
EN
The article reflects upon the question of modifications in canonical matrimonial processes caused by pope Francis’ motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Some of the issues brought up by the author are: changes of tribunals’ competences in matrimonial cases, collegiality of the tribunal, the sufficiency and enforceability of the sentence after the affirmative decision of the first instance and both the positive and negative effects of designing a briefer form of trying nullity cases called processus matrimonialis brevior coram Episcopo.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Brak rozeznania oceniającego - przyczyną nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej z 16 X 1988 r. c. Bruno

75%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1991
|
vol. 2
88-101
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza definitiva del turno rotale (pronunciata in terza istanza) c. Bruno il 16 dicembre 1988 in causa Meliten, di nullità del matrimonio „ob gravem defectum discretionis indicii” dal convenuto. Le nozze delle parti furono celebrate il 12 agosto 1944. Dopo il divorzio civile (1976) l’attrice aveva accusato la nullità del suo matrimonio presso il tribunale di prima istanza „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii” nonché „ob exclusionem boni fidei” dal marito. Il 15 aprille 1980 il tribunale si è prounciato „pro invaliditate”ma solo „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii”. L’appello interposto alla Rota Romana provcó la sentanza negativa - dai due titoli di invalidità - il 1 marzo 1984. Apellato il nuovo turno rotale ha dichiarato la nullità del matrimonio, come è stato detto sopra. La sentenza definitiva è stata dunque pronunciata perfino dopo 44 anni dalla celebrazione delle nozze.
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Duchowny jako świadek w procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa

75%
Dappa R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2015
|
vol. 26
|
issue 2
73-84
EN
The central part of cases to declare the nullity of marriage is investigation. Code of Canon Law enumerates following evidence: the declarations of the parties, proof through documents, witnesses and testimonies, experts, judicial examination and inspection, presumptions. Among these the most popular in cases to declare the nullity of marriage are undoubtedly witnesses and testimonies. It is true that can. 1549 CIC prescribe very wide the possibilities of using these means, however not everyone might be a witness. Among few categories of people unable to witnessing at court, the law enumerates inter alia, priests. However this inability is not absolute and it results from the specific character of pastoral ministry. Main interest of present compilation is an analysis of can. 1548 CIC and can. 1550 CIC according to cleric persons. An inability to witnessing at court resulting from the secrecy of confession, and exemption from obligatory testimonies resulting from conducting sacred ministry, are two basic categories limiting the possibility of calling a clergyman in testimony. The present compilation comprises an attempt of analysis of practical usage of these legal norms.
11
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Powołanie biegłego do udziału w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Dzięga A.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1992
|
vol. 3
70-79
EN
Nel Codice di Diritto Canonico si usa la parola „peritus” nel senso largo e ,,pe- ritus” nel senso stretto del termine, cioè perito giudiziale. Per essuere un perito nel senso largo ci vuole la scienza teoretica, accademica, oppure la scienza realmente posseduta, almeno la scienza pratica, l’esperienza. Un perito giudiziale dovrebbe avere la scienza teoretica, accademica, ed essere un vero esperto nel metodo scientifico, poiché un perito nel senso largo è spesso anche il giudice stesso. Lo scopo specifico dell’opera del perito giudiziale è dare la vera relazione scientifica sui capitoli definiti dal giudice.Il perito giudiziale è chiamato al processo nel modo fondamentale oppure nel modo supplementare. Il modo fondamentale consiste in questo: il giudice con un decreto speciale nomina il perito, quando lo decide il diritto (secondo il can. 1680) o lo stesso giudice consultando le parti oppure secondo la proposta delle parti stesse, e chiede al perito una relazione scritta e l’esame giudiziale. Eallora la vera prova ufficiale. Nel modo supplementare invece la parte propone la relazione scritta fatta fuoriprocesso, che il giudice deve accettare, oppure la parte chiama il perito privato sempre con il beneplacito del giudice stesso. In questo caso basta la relazione scritta e l’esame non è più necessario, però può essere richiesto.
12
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Udział stron procesowych w ustaleniu formuły sporu w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Dzięga A.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1992
|
vol. 3
55-69
EN
Le parti processuali nelle cause matrimoniali sono l’attore e il convenuto. Il difensore del vincolo ha nel processo i diritti analoghi. In werità la lite si svolge invece fra la costatazione della presunzione della legge: „il matrimonio N.N. è valido” e la tesi dell’attore: „il mio matrimonio è invalido”. In questa lite il difensore prende la parte della validità del matrimonio. Il convenuto invece può difendere la validità del matrimonio o impugnarlo insieme con l’attore oppure essere assente.Con il termine „litis contestatio” si definisce la sola decisione con la quale il giudice stabilisce la formula del dubbio oppure tutta la fase preliminare del processo fino al decreto della litis contestatio. Q uesta fase può svolgersi nei modi seguenti: 1. La corrispondenza fra il giudice e le parti processuali finita col decreto della contestatione della lite; 2. Il decreto del giudice in base al solito libello introduttorio; 3. La sessione davanti al giudice finita col suo decreto; 4. Nelle cause più difficili: la corrispondenza fra il giudice e le parti con la successiva sessione finita col decreto del giudice.Durante la fase della litis contestatio a ll’attore ed al convenuto spettano i seguenti diritti: 1. Prendere l’iniziativa processuale; 2. Scegliere il modo di procedere chiedendo la sessione; 3. Suggerire al giudice la formula del dubbio; 4. Accettare la formula del dubbio stabilita dal giudice. Inoltre nella fase dell’istruzione le parti possono chiedere il cambiamento della formula del dubbio. Al difensore del vincolo spettano i diritti uguali oltre che suggerire qualcun titolo d ’invalidità del matrimonio.
13
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zdrada a nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Wieczorek M.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2023
|
vol. 34
|
issue 2
105-127
EN
The article undertakes an analysis of several sentences issued by the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. The main issue is infidelity of one of the spouses. Although infidelity is not a cause of nullity of marriage, it can be taken into account as a relevant circumstance for evaluating the evidence. The analysis contains judgments for the exclusion of marital fidelity and incapacity to assume essential marital duties due to mental reasons and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage. The research material allows for a better understanding of infidelity itself but also highlights the proper way to proceed with cases where infidelity is the main line of evidence.
PL
Artykuł podejmuje analizę kilku sentencji wydanych przez Trybunał Roty Rzymskiej, w których na pierwszy plan wysuwa się zdrada jednego z małżonków. Zdrada nie jest przyczyną nieważności małżeństwa, ale może być brana pod uwagę jako istotna okoliczność oceny materiału dowodowego. Przedmiotem analizy były wyroki z tytułu wykluczenia wierności małżeńskiej, niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich z przyczyn natury psychicznej, a także z tytułu wykluczenia nierozerwal- ności małżeństwa. Zaprezentowany materiał badawczy pozwala na lepsze zrozumienie zdrady i właściwego sposobu procedowania spraw, gdzie linia dowodzenia koncentruje się na niewierności.
14

Zadania obrońcy węzła w procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Kovářová Kochová I.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2019
|
vol. 29
|
issue 1
131-150
PL
Artykuł dotyczy statusu obrońcy węzła w procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa po reformie procesu małżeńskiego papieża Franciszka na mocy Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. W artykule zwrócono uwagę na zadania obrońcy węzła we wszystkich etapach postępowania. Jego głównym zadaniem w procesie jest zebranie wszystkich argumentów na korzyść ważności małżeństwa.
EN
The article deals with the status of a defender in the proceedings of the nullity of marragie after the reform of the marriage process by Pope Francis, Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Attention is paid to the tasks of the defender of the bond at all stages of this proceeding. In the proceeding, the defender of the bond is summoned to gather all the arguments in favour of the validity of the marriage.
15
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nieważność małżeństwa oraz niezaistnienie małżeństwa w kanonicznym porządku prawnym

75%
Dzierżon G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2001
|
vol. 12
|
issue 6
7-31
EN
L'attenzione dei legislatore nel sistema matrimoniale canonico si concentra fra l'altro sul argomento dell'invalidita dei matrimonio. Ē noto che in questo ordine tutti i matrimoni celebrati in validamente entrano nella categoria di matrimonio invalido. Si deve aggiungere che, per quanto riguarda il diritto processuale, il legislatore tratta tutti questi patti matrimoniali in modo uguale, senza alcuna distinzione. Perciò i matrimoni che entrano che nella cattegoria di matrimonio invalido richiedono la dichiarazione di nullite ottenuta presso i tribunali ecclesiastici. Però l'applicazione della teoria del atto giuridico al sistema matrimoniale canonico ci ha permesso di individuare tre forme dell'invalidita del patto coniugale, cioè: la inexistentia dei consenso matrimoniale, il difetto dei consenso matrimoniale e l'invalidita causata dagli impedimenti matrimoniali. Nel sistema matrimoniale canonico funziona anche altra categoria, cioè inexistentia matrimonii. Tali sono il matrimonio civile e quello religioso celebrato dinanzi ad un ministro non cattolico in circostanze nelle quali deve essere celebrato secondo la forma canonica ordnaria a norma del с. 1117. Paragonando questo fenomeno con l'invalidità del matrimonio osserviamo che questi matrimoni non possono essere ammessi nei tribunali ecclesiatici - nemmeno essere trattati per il processo documentale (c. 1686 - 1688). Quindi l'ommisione totale della forma canonica non entra nella cattegoria dell'invalidita del matrimonio, cos pseudo - coniugi sono liberi per celebrare il matrimonio con terze persone, senza particolari formalite, tranne quelle communi alla pratica prematrimoniale (c. 1065 - 1071). Tali casi dal punto di vista teorico contengono tutti gli elementi essenziali dellatto giuridico, maunelemento estrinseco, cioè la legge irritante rende il consenso giuridicamente inefficace. Quindi quei matrimoni non producono alcun effetto giurdico nel sistema matrimoniale canonico.
16
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zasady opracowywania opinii biegłego psychologa w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

75%
Krupa W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1996
|
vol. 7
|
issue 6/1
137-142
17
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przyjęcie skargi o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa

75%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1996
|
vol. 7
|
issue 6/1
143-152
18
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola obrońcy węzła w procesach małżeńskich

75%
Mazurkiewicz D.
Studia Paradyskie
|
2016
|
vol. 26
107-124
PL
Obrońca węzła pełni znaczącą rolę w kanonicznych procesach małżeńskich. Jego zadaniem jest reprezentowanie Kościoła i stanie na straży bonum publicum, którym jest nierozerwalność ważnego węzła małżeńskiego. Z woli prawodawcy jest gwarantem poprawności zastosowania procedur sądowych i powinien przedstawiać wszystko, co w sposób rozumny przemawia za ważnością małżeństwa. Obecność defensora w proce-sach stała się jeszcze bardziej znaczącą po zmianach, które do prawa kanonicznego wprowadził papież Franciszek w Liście apostolskim motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Dotyczy to zwłaszcza jego zadań w kontekście odstąpienia przez prawodawcę od obowiązku apelacji po pozytywnym wyroku trybunału I instancji oraz w procesie skróconym przed biskupem diecezjalnym. Prawo apelacji i zaskarżania wyroku, które mu przysługuje, stanowi skuteczny środek ochronny przed wydaniem niesprawiedliwego wyroku.
EN
Defender of the bond acts a significant role in the canonical process of marriage. His task is representing the Church and protection of this kind the public good, which is indissolubility valid marriage bond. By the will of the legislator he is the guarantor of the correctness of the application of judicial procedures and he should present every-thing, what in the way of rational supports the validity of marriage. The presence of the defender in the process has become even more important after the changes to the canon law which were introduced by the pope Francis in the Apostolic Letter motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus (The Lord Jesus, Gentle Judge). This applies especially to some tasks of defenders in the context of the withdrawal of the legislator from the obligation to appeal after a positive judgment of the court of first instance and in the shorter and more streamlined process, judged personally by the diocesan bishop, for certain rare and exceptional cases. The defenders right to appeal and the appeal against the judgment is an effective preventive measure before issuing an unfair judgment.
19
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wpływ organicznej impotencji kobiecej na nieważność małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pinto z 27.10.1995 r.

75%
Dzierżon G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2000
|
vol. 11
|
issue 5
211-216
EN
Si trata di una sentenza rotale pro nulliate, emanata dal titolo del can. 1084. Il ponente rotale ha concentrato la sua attenzione alla questione d ’impotenza organica femminile. Questo impedimento impedisce il matrimonio in forza del diritto naturale. II ponente rotale sottolinea che si deve distinguere l’impotenza fisica da quella funzionale. Soltanto la l’impotenza antecedente e perpetua causa la nullità del matrimonio.
20
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

"Pro veritate et iustitia" : deontologia sędziego kościelnego w kanonicznym procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa

75%
Nowicka U.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2012
|
vol. 23
|
issue 17
85-95
EN
Nell’esercizio delle sue funzioni giudiziarie ognuno giudice è legato dalle norme di diritto. La funzione del giudice ecclesiastico ha un valore speciale perchè riguarda la salvezza degli uomini. Per questo motivo un luogo principale tra tutti i principi deontologici ha il principio di giustizia ed anche il principio di verità. Lo scopo del seguente articolo è l’analisi delle modalità di svolgimento di questi principi nel processo canonico di nullità matrimoniale.
first rewind previous Page / 5 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.