Search results

1

After Ontotheology: Reciprocal, Caring, Creative, and Right Relationships

100%

Garrison J.

Human Affairs

|

2009

|

vol. 19

|

issue 1

36-43

EN

With the end of ontotheology we may realize, as Dewey did, that what sustains us is our caring relationships with physical nature, biological life, and other persons. My paper argues that relationships are ontologically basic and caring relations are morally basic. Right relationship binds us to the world and holds us together. We live by the grace of others. I conclude that after ontotheology, we must seek to form reciprocal, caring, and creative relationships.

2

Luther’s ‘Metaphysics’ in Heidegger’s Beiträge

89%

Armitage D.

Theological Research. A Journal of Systematic Theology

|

2017

|

vol. 5

EN

This essay argues that Luther’s “metaphysics” is present in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Contributions to Philosophy), a text many consider to be Heidegger’s second magnum opus. I argue that Luther’s “metaphysics” is present in Heidegger’s Contributions in primarily two ways: (1) there is a Lutheran structure (of existential categories) that Heidegger appropriated not only in Being and Time, but also much earlier in his lectures on St. Paul from the 1920s, of responding to a call and converting in anxious anticipation toward a futural not-yet (what Heidegger calls “the last god”); and (2) Contributions’ project concerns overcoming metaphysics, which involves first thinking through to metaphysics’ conditions for possibility, which means recognizing the “ironic nature” of beyng via what Heidegger calls “thinking concealment,” the logic of which originates in Luther’s attacks on not only Greek metaphysics, but upon Judaism and the Mosaic law as well.

3

The Missing Pieces of Derrida’s Voice and Phenomenon

88%

Harman G.

Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture

|

2022

|

vol. 6

|

issue 2

4-25

EN

Jacques Derrida’s critique of Edmund Husserl in Voice and Phenomenon targets several ways in which Husserl’s theory of signs is said to remain dependent on a model of presence, and therefore to be a form of onto-theology. In a sense this simply extends Martin Heidegger’s own critique of Husserl as failing to account for what remains obscure behind any presentation to the mind. Yet Derrida’s critique is ultimately more radical than Heidegger’s, though the radicality is in this case unjustified. Namely, Derrida goes beyond Heidegger’s critique of presence to mount an additional critique of “self-presence,” which is more often known as “identity.” Derrida’s insufficiently motivated critique of identity leads to additional problems for his philosophy.

4

O mowie, piśmie i innych mediach: peregrynacje po genealogii pojęć z Peterem Sloterdijkiem

38%

Hudzik J.

Roczniki Filozoficzne

|

2017

|

vol. 65

|

issue 1

89-107

PL

Celem artykułu jest próba przedstawienia krótkiej genealogicznej historii medium mowy i pisma, która wykorzystuje, rozwija i rekonstruuje zarazem, poglądy i punkt widzenia Sloterdijka na ten temat. Przedmiotem analiz jest formacja dyskursywna o mowie i piśmie ukształtowana w kulturze zachodniej, składająca się z argumentacji i wyobrażeń zawartych w Biblii, tekstach filozoficznych, głównie Platona i Hegla, i literackich, tu tylko sygnalnie odnotowanych. Chodzi wreszcie także o historię społeczną, spojrzenie na rewolucje i kolonializm przez pryzmat medium druku/pisma — opartych na nim relacji władzy i panowania. Dla Sloterdijka wszystkie te zdarzenia dyskursywne i społeczne mają wspólne podłoże resentymentalne — zakłada on bowiem za Nietzschem, że u źródeł kultury czai się okrucieństwo i perwersja. Pytanie: po co to robi, co nowego ta zużyta historycznie rama interpretacyjne pozwala mu powiedzieć o mediach dawniej i dziś?

EN

This article concerns the short genealogical history of speech and writing media, which simultaneously takes an advantage of, develops as well as reconstructs, the appropriate points of view and attitudes by Peter Sloterdijk. The object of analysis is a discursive formation on speech and writing shaped in western culture, a formation consisting of arguments and imaginations contained in the Bible, philosophical writings, by Plato and Hegel mainly, and literature, indicated here only very slightly. Social history is eventually discused here, that is the view of revolutions and colonialism through the prism of print/writing medium — through the relationships of power and domination based on this medium. All the discursive and social events have their common resentment background according to Sloterdijk — following Nietzsche he assumes that there are cruelty and perversion that lurk at the roots of culture. The question is: why does he do that, what new does the historically worn-out interpretational frame let him tell about the media in the past and today?

Refine search results

1 Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture

1 Human Affairs

1 Roczniki Filozoficzne

1 Theological Research. A Journal of Systematic Theology

1 Armitage D.

1 Garrison J.

1 Harman G.

1 Hudzik J.

1 2022

2 2017

1 2009

After Ontotheology: Reciprocal, Caring, Creative, and Right Relationships

Luther’s ‘Metaphysics’ in Heidegger’s Beiträge

The Missing Pieces of Derrida’s Voice and Phenomenon

O mowie, piśmie i innych mediach: peregrynacje po genealogii pojęć z Peterem Sloterdijkiem