Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Roczniki Nauk Prawnych

Authors help

  1. 1 Trzewik J.

  2. 1 Tzrewik J.

Years help

  1. 2 2017

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  provincial inspector of monuments
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

The Status of the Provincial Inspector of Monuments in Civil Proceedings in the Light of Act on the Preservation and Maintenance of Monuments

100%
Trzewik J.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2017
|
vol. 27
|
issue 2 English Online Version
61-78
EN
This article presents considerations with regard to the status of the provincial inspector of monuments in civil proceedings. The entitlements of this public authority in respect of monument protection are set out in article 95 of the Act on the preservation and maintenance of monuments. The legislator, in a rather concise and imprecise manner, defines the status of the inspector in civil proceedings. Despite the cardinal importance of this regulation, it provides ground for a great deal of debate.
2

The Procedural Status of the Provincial Inspector of Monuments in Civil Proceedings in the Light of Legislative Changes

100%
Tzrewik J.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2017
|
vol. 27
|
issue 3 English Online Version
71-85
EN
The article presents considerations on the procedural status of the provincial inspector of monuments in civil proceedings against the background of the recent legislative changes. The procedural rights of the monuments protection authority in civil proceedings are set out in art. 95 of the act on the protection and care of monuments. As a result of the newly introduced act on the restitution of the national cultural property into the Polish legal system, this provision has been modified by removing the provincial inspector of monuments from the catalogue of monuments protection authorities authorised to use the procedural means of monuments protection in civil proceedings. Despite the understandable need to fill in the legal gap enabling the return of seized cultural goods, the recent amendment still provides a platform for academic polemics.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.