Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  radical hermeneutics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The article is an interpretation of the traditional figure of the hermeneutic circle made from the perspective of John D. Caputo’s radical hermeneutics. It begins with a recapitulation of the most important modern positions on the hermeneutic circle, which postmodern hermeneutics radicalizes, noting the impossibility of its closure or fulfillment. Movement in the postmodern hermeneutic circle takes place not between the parts and the whole, but only between the different parts. Thus, one might say that this circle is twisted, and this has a dual meaning. It evokes Jacques Derrida’s interpretation of a phrase from Hamlet, “time is out of joint”, but it also plays with the meaning of the twist, which can be understood as a Verwindung: the impossibility of the transgression beyond modern hermeneutics.
PL
This article deals with radical hermeneutics in Vladimir Makanin’s micro-novel The Loss. The article presents the position that John D. Caputo’s flow is fundamental to Makanin’s hermeneutics. The author refers to Vladimir Ivancov’s research and debates with Anna Skotnicka and Anna Stankevich.
EN
This article deals with radical hermeneutics in Vladimir Makanin’s micro-novel The Loss. The article presents the position that John D. Caputo’s flow is fundamental to Makanin’s hermeneutics. The author refers to Vladimir Ivancov’s research and debates with Anna Skotnicka and Anna Stankevich
EN
The paper is an attempt to reflect on whether hermeneutics can still be a cognitively fruitful approach in literary studies, especially in respect of contemporary output. The authoress analyses two currents in the literature, which could be named integrating and eristic. They seem to correspond with two paradigms in hermeneutics: affirmative, concentrating on “brightening an existence”, and radical, emphasizing “weakness”, “flux”, “collapsing” etc. A key issue is the doubt whether applying the name “hermeneutics” is not in itself misleading, as it concerns diametrically opposed points of view. The authoress proposes her own understanding of hermeneutics as a perspective of reading literature, which “cling on” to the protagonists’, author’s and interpreter’s experience. She also invokes the metaphors of scaffolding and house building, where the home is marked with an unrelenting “uneasiness” and lacks strong foundations, but does convey the situation of incessant common constructing the accidental and demanding protection of meaning.
PL
In the article I compare the interpretation of Vladimir Makanin’s Otstavshiynovel (Отставший) by Tatyana Churlyaeva and the idea of radical hermeneutics, which,in my view, explain Makanin’s works more fully.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.