Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  self-stigmatization
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Witaj bracie, pisać nadal trudno. Raz jeszcze o reakcji rosyjskich intelektualistów na wydarzenia 2014 roku

100%
Morawiecki J.
Academic Journal of Modern Philology
|
2021
|
issue 14
275–287
EN
This article attempts to present, summarize and develop an essay Witaj bracie, pisać bardzo trudno (Hello brother, it is very difficult to write). The essay under scrutiny was devoted to the reception of changes in public discourse by Russian intellectuals after the occupation of Crimea. The following features were the most important ones: diagnosing anomie, shock, caused by an unexpected cultural change; weak presence of pro-European rhetoric in the messages of authors considered to be pro-Western (occidentalists); stigmatization of intellectuals (restoration of the category of “fifth column and traitors of the nation”), as well as their self-stigmatization (recalling the nineteenthcentury category of “superfluous man”); historical references to the times of Tsar Nicholas I and Leonid Brezhnev (no references to the Stalinist period, which will appear after 2015); replacement of the term “public opinion” with the “mass-media effect”; belief in degradation, social demoralization, which would result from the determinism of the “Russian way”; restoration of the Russian intelligentsia category. Finally, an attempt was made to present new determinants of social dynamics influencing the change in the Russian journalists’ discourse that intensified after the year 2015.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problem etykietowania i stygmatyzacji wśród wychowanków zakładów poprawczych i schronisk dla nieletnich. Socjologiczna analiza zjawiska

67%
Chomczyński P.
Studia Socjologiczne
|
2015
|
issue 4(219)
205-236
XX
Artykuł ma charakter empiryczny i stanowi podsumowanie kilkuletnich terenowych badań jakościowych poświęconych tematyce interakcji grupowych wśród wychowanków zakładów poprawczych i schronisk dla nieletnich. Poruszona została tutaj problematyka szeroko pojętych działań stygmatyzacyjnych na poziomie werbalnym i niewerbalnym, dziewcząt i chłopców zarówno wobec siebie (działania autostygmatyzacyjne), jak i siebie nawzajem. W artykule omówione zostały także uwarunkowania leżące u podstaw praktyk stygmatyzacyjnych, inicjowanych przez wychowanków, które determinują ich społeczną percepcję. Analiza materiału empirycznego dokonana została z perspektywy teorii naznaczania oraz koncepcji habitusu Pierre’a Bourdieu oraz Jeana Claude’a Passerona.
EN
The following paper encompasses results of a few years of qualitative field study concerning group interactions among juvenile delinquents from reformatories and shelters. In the article there is discussed the problem of practices oriented on stigmatization both in verbal and nonverbal terms initiated by female and male juveniles. There are discussed conditions lying under self-stigmatization practices taken by inmates, which determine their social perception. In analyses there was helpful habitus theory by Pierre Bourdieu and Jean Claude Passeron but also conceptions of Erving Goffman encompassing social construction of stigma.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.