Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  sygnatura
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
Having in mind the incessant- evolution of the notion of „historical (ancient) object”, the author inte rprets regulation concerning the assay law. In the re gulations being in force since 1963 it is stated that the objects having hallmarks and being presented for th e renewed testing should be marked once again on the condition th a t the quantity of the precious metal proved to be different. Consequently, the p re viously made hallmarks should be cancelled. The author is of the opinion th a t this regulation does not account for goldsmithing research needs and makes it possible to misuse the hallmarks cancelling toals. Other regulations do not precisely define historical value of jewels appointing the caesura till the year 1860 and taking no account of the jewels dating from the end of the 19th century. The author postulates to preserve old hallmarks apart from the new ones and also to establish, within the assay offices, new divisions the task of which would be, among others, to conduct the cataloguing of hall-marks. In the conclusion the author states that the committee including the members of the trade and historical monuments protection institutions will have to prepare amendments to the assay law.
EN
Emblem as a genre composed of words and images is an extremely interesting research object. Hidden in the allegorical picture content is being developed and read in two stages: the inscription — which is often quote (taken out of the works of well–known authors), and signature — presenting the author’s thoughts about the complexity of the world, human and their physical and metaphysical relationships. Article shows how the allegorical picture hides or reveals creator’s reflections, how the correlation between words and ideas with the image looks like, as well as legibility (or illegibility) of artistic vision in itself helps (and whether it helps) in the interpretation of the text. Also tries to answer the question of whether and how in today’s “pictorial culture”, the young recipient is able to read and interpret old Polish emblems.
EN
This article attempts to address the three consequences of circumcising Leptines – a protagonist of Teodor Parnicki’s two novels – with regard to physicality (or eroticism), social issues (antisemitism), and identity. At the same time, it is argued that Leptines is not only one of the first hybrid protagonist in Parnicki’s fiction; in fact, the persistence in creating corresponding heroes and the similarities they share might suggest that Leptines functions also as the author’s signature.
PL
W tekście podjęta zostaje próba pokazania konsekwencji obrzezania Leptynesa, bohatera dwóch powieści Teodora Parnickiego, na trzech polach: fizycznym (erotycznym), społecznym (antysemityzm), tożsamości. Jednocześnie wskazuje się, że Leptynes nie tylko jest jednym z pierwszych bohaterów‑mieszańców w prozie Parnickiego, ale także ich życiorysy są takpodobne, że można przyjąć, iż Leptynes stanowi rodzaj sygnatury pisarza w jego tekstach.
Porównania
|
2018
|
vol. 23
|
issue 2
259-278
EN
This article focuses on the presence of mythological imagination in the work of one of the greatest post-war painters. The author defines the myth present in the works of Andrzej Wróblewski created in the 1940s and 1950s. The author presents three possible ways of understanding the myth: the myth of Orpheus, the myth of a lonely artist and the myth of a new cosmos. The author also discusses other problems: the status of his paintings in contemporary criticism, the reverse of artistic biography and languages of modernism from the 1950s.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł koncentruje się na obecności wyobraźni mitologicznej w twórczości jednego z najwybitniejszych malarzy powojennych. Autorka podejmuje w nim próbę zdefiniowania mitu obecnego w dziełach Andrzeja Wróblewskiego powstałych w latach czterdziestych i pięćdziesiątych. Zwraca uwagę na trzy możliwe sposoby jego odczytania. Stąd omówieniom poddaje mit orficki, mit odrzuconego artysty oraz mit nowego kosmosu. Interpretacja sztuki Andrzeja Wróblewskiego skierowana jest dodatkowo na omówienie kilku problemów, między innymi: statusu jego obrazów we współczesnej krytyce, rewersów biografii artystycznej, a także języków modernizmu, jakie od lat pięćdziesiątych funkcjonują w opowieściach o malarzu.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.