Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  syntactic functions
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

DER DÄNISCHE PRÄPOSITIONALE INFINITIV UND SEINE WIEDERGABE IM POLNISCHEN

100%
Jarosz J., Łukomski K.
Germanica Wratislaviensia
|
2011
|
vol. 133
95-108
EN
This paper deals with one of the typical features of Danish prepositions – building of phrases with the infinitive as a dependent. The analysis is based on a corpus consisting of 111 examples compiled from literary texts, it includes syntactical schemes with twelve primary prepositions and presents their syntactic functions and semantic characteristics. The discussed phrases are almost not present in the Polish syntax (there is only one preposition which builds this kind of phrases) therefore there are given translations to show potential equivalents in the target language.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Deutsche Präpositionen als Träger lexikalischer Informationen. Eine Segmentierung nach Kriterien lexikalischer Autonomie

72%
López-Campos Bodineau R.
Forum Filologiczne Ateneum
|
2019
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1
123-141
DE
Der vorliegende Artikel untersucht die Aufladung mit semantischer Bedeutung innerhalb der lexikalischen Kategorie der Präpositionen. Präpositionen in der deutschen Sprache sind, wie in den meisten anglo-germanischen Sprachen, im Rahmen zweier sehr bestimmter Satzglieder, der adverbialen Bestimmung und dem Präpositionalobjekt, besonders produktiv. Traditionell sind diese im ersten Fall, insbesondere dann, wenn es gegensätzliche Bedeutungspaare gibt, mit einer semantischen Bedeutung aufgeladen, während sie im Rahmen des zweiten Satzgliedes normalerweise eher rein konventionell und mit spärlicher lexikalischer Motivation verwendet werden. In diesem Artikel wird eine mögliche Relativierung dieses Ansatzes geprüft werden und so die Fälle der Präpositionen mit kaum lexikalischer Bedeutung im Rahmen des Satzglieds der adverbialen Bestimmung und, gleichermaßen, die Fälle von Präpositionen mit semantischem Wert im Rahmen des Satzglieds der Präpositionalobjekte hervorgehoben.
EN
This article is related to the study of the semantic load of the lexical category of prepositions. German prepositions, as in most Anglo-Germanic languages, are especially productive in the framework of two very specific syntactic functions: circumstantial complement and prepositional complement. Traditionally, in the context of the first one some type of semantic load is conferred on them, especially in cases where opposition pairs are available, while in the context of the second function they usually talk about uses of a purely conventional type with little lexical motivation. Through this article the possibility of relativizing this approach will be considered, and, thus, highlighting cases of prepositions with hardly any lexical load within the framework of a function as circumstantial complement, and, in the same way cases of prepositions with some kind of semantic value in the framework of the function as a repositional complement.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Modelli di descrizione grammaticale nei manuali di italiano per apprendenti di madrelingua tedesca

72%
Serena E.
Italica Wratislaviensia
|
2018
|
issue 9.1
247-269
IT
Il presente contributo analizza l’apparato concettuale e terminologico impiegato nelle sezioni grammaticali dei manuali di italiano per apprendenti adulti/e di madrelingua tedesca. L’articolo si propone in particolare di stabilire che tipo di relazione queste sezioni intrattengono con l’apparato concettuale della grammatica tradizionale (GT) e con i modelli della linguistica moderna (LM). L’analisi considera in particolare le seguenti variabili: 1) trattamento delle parti del discorso con particolare attenzione per la modalità di presentazione e per i criteri di definizione; 2) presenza o assenza di riferimenti espliciti o impliciti alla nozione di sintagma; 3) trattamento delle funzioni sintattiche di soggetto, oggetto diretto e indiretto e complementi; 4) terminologia impiegata. Dall’analisi scaturiscono le seguenti conclusioni: le differenze più vistose nel modo in cui vengono trattate le parti del discorso riguardano gli articoli e le classi trasversali come dimostrativi, indefiniti e possessivi; le definizioni delle parti del discorso non seguono criteri omogenei; i riferimenti al concetto di sintagma ̶ fondamentale nella LM e sconosciuta o ignorata nella GT ̶ sono solo impliciti; le funzioni di soggetto, oggetto e complementi sono più volte citate senza che, però ne vengano fornite definizioni esplicite; le scelte terminologiche presentano infine un certo grado di eclettismo, dal momento che includono sia termini della terminologia metalinguistica internazionale sia termini della tradizione scolastica tedesca e italiana.
EN
This paper investigates the conceptual and terminological framework employed in the grammatical sections of Italian textbooks for German-speaking adult learners. The paper especially aims to establish what relationship these sections have with the framework of traditional grammar (TG) and models of grammatical description in modern linguistics (ML). The analysis takes the following variables into account: 1) treatment of parts of speech, paying particular attention to manners of presentation and criteria of definition; 2) presence or absence of explicit or implicit references to the concept of “phrase”; 3) treatment of the syntactic functions of subject, direct and indirect objects, and complements; and 4) employed terminology. The analysis leads to several conclusions. First, the most remarkable differences in the treatment of parts of speech from textbook to textbook concern articles and transversal classes such as demonstratives, indefinites, and possessives. Additionally, when parts of speech are explicitly defined, the definitions do not follow homogeneous criteria. Furthermore, references to the concept of “phrase”, fundamental in ML and unknown or ignored in TG, are only implicit. Moreover, though the functions of subject, object, and complements are mentioned often, they are never explicitly defined. Finally, terminological choices are somewhat eclectic, as they include terms from international metalinguistic terminology as well as technical vocabulary from the German and Italian school traditions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.