Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  teaching qualitative research
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

“Why was I not taught to use this software earlier?” A gendered exploration of university students’ beliefs towards their future use of CAQDAS

100%
MacCormac M.
International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies
|
2019
|
vol. 6(1)
58-70
EN
The use of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) for the organization and analysis of qualitative data has been a hotly debated topic among qualitative researchers since the inception of the technology in the 1980s (Smith & Hesse-Biber, 1996; and Bong, 2002). Proponents of the software claim that QDAS can help strengthen the validity, reliability, and accuracy of data analysis, whereas critics have cautioned that the use of such software distances the researchers from the data and attempts to make the data objective (Saldaña, 2013). The debates surrounding the use of qualitative software have contributed to a lack of student training in academic settings. Consequently, few studies have examined the student experience and decision-making process regarding the use of QDAS in the university setting (Paulus, Woods, Atkins, & Mackin, 2015). Using reflective response data collected from participants of a beginner qualitative coding workshop, this paper adds to the limited literature on student experiences using QDAS by examining gender differences in how participants critically reflected on their first experience using QDAS and examines the likelihood that participants would use QDAS in their future work. Findings from this study indicate that participants who used QDAS for the first time perceived that there are more potential benefits to using QDAS versus manual coding. Gender differences were present with female participants strongly believing that the software would allow them to be more effective and efficient researchers, and male participants believing that they would be better able to gain deeper insights into their data.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Metafory w praktyce dydaktycznej (i badawczej). Jak obrazowo uczyć badań jakościowych?

84%
Marciniak Ł.
Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej
|
2022
|
vol. 18
|
issue 4
168-193
EN
The purpose of this article is to present the potential of metaphors and their use in teaching qualitative research methodology. Starting with the review of the most important achievements in the field of using metaphors as an object of knowledge and a cognitive tool, I will go on to describe the genesis of interest in metaphors in didactics. I will present the process of experimenting with the use of metaphors during methodological classes and the obtained results, both at the content level (i.e. discovering metaphors for qualitative research) and at the procedural level (i.e. reconstructing ways of working with a metaphor in class), all of which also refers to, albeit indirectly, to research. At the same time, in the article, I make a definition-related distinction between two general types of qualitative research, which emerged while working with metaphors.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie potencjału metafor i możliwości ich stosowania w nauczaniu metodologii badań jakościowych. Rozpoczynając od przeglądu najważniejszych dokonań w zakresie wykorzystywania metafor jako przedmiotu poznania i narzędzia poznawczego, autor przechodzi do opisania genezy zainteresowania się metaforami w dydaktyce. Przedstawia proces eksperymentowania ze stosowaniem metafor podczas zajęć metodologicznych oraz wypracowane rezultaty, tak na poziomie treściowym – odkrywania metafor dla badania jakościowego, jak i na poziomie proceduralnym – rekonstruowania sposobów pracy z metaforą na zajęciach, a pośrednio także podczas badań. Jednocześnie w artykule dokonuje definicyjnego wyodrębnienia dwóch generalnych typów badań jakościowych wyłonionych podczas pracy z metaforami.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.