Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  text’s variants
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kolacjonowanie przekazów wierszy Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina na podstawie wybranych liryków zawartych w autografie poety – dylematy edytorskie

100%
Bednarek B., Uniwersytet Łódzki W. F., beatkaprokopczyk@gmail.com
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica
|
2016
|
vol. 34
|
issue 4
EN
Franciszek Dionizy Kniaźnin has created manuscript for a few years. It was a kind of his poetica will. In this collection, titled Poezje Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina ręką własną pisane, author included works published in three previous collections volumes of verse as well as completely new poems. Reused works had many editorial alterations compared to original ones. First time published works had been totally unknown before. Poezje Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina ręką własną pisane was not published as printed, scientific edition yet. This article describes today’s editor dilemmas about making a critical edition of four first book contained in the first volume of autograph. Mainly it is focused on the problem of comparasion variants of particular texts, which often are very different.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„WSTYDNO W UKRAINIE, KIEDY PIOSNKA NIE TAK PŁYNIE” MIĘDZY WARIANTAMI ZAWERUCHY TOMASZA OLIZAROWSKIEGO

100%
Supeł K.
Świat Tekstów. Rocznik Słupski
|
2019
|
vol. 17
241-254
PL
Zestawienie opublikowanych za życia autora wariantów Zaweruchy. Powieści ukraińskiej Tomasza Olizarowskiego ma na celu wykazanie różnic między odmianami utworu oraz ich wpływu na interpretację całego tekstu. W artykule szczególną uwagę zwrócono na opuszczone w drugim wydaniu epilogi oraz część Ranek, opowiadającą o zabłąkanych duszach głównych bohaterów, jak również na rozbudowany wątek Czumaka, którego postać w późniejszej wersji wysuwa się na pierwszy plan. Przywołanie recenzji i prac historycznoliterackich służy nie tylko ukazaniu preferencji krytyków i badaczy w wyborze edycji omawianego poematu, lecz także stanowi impuls do postawienia pytania o słuszność ich decyzji.
EN
This article deals with the different versions of Zawerucha. Powieść Ukraińska by Tomasz Olizarowski which were published within the author’s lifetime. The aim of this paper is to present the differences between them as well as to analyse how they influence on the interpretation of the whole text. Of the special interest are: the epilogues which were omitted in the second edition, Ranek, the part which presents haunted spirits of the main characters, and the extensively developed strand of Czumak, whose character becomes increasingly important in later edition of the novel. Both reviews and literary history essays have been mentioned in order to show the critics’ and researches’ attitudes towards choosing the version of the novel to be further discussed, which consequently becomes an impulse to consider the validity of their choice.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kolacjonowanie przekazów wierszy Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina na podstawie wybranych liryków zawartych w autografie poety – dylematy edytorskie

80%
Bednarek B.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica
|
2016
|
vol. 34
|
issue 4
235-246
EN
Franciszek Dionizy Kniaźnin has created manuscript for a few years. It was a kind of his poetica will. In this collection, titled Poezje Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina ręką własną pisane, author included works published in three previous collections volumes of verse as well as completely new poems. Reused works had many editorial alterations compared to original ones. First time published works had been totally unknown before. Poezje Franciszka Dionizego Kniaźnina ręką własną pisane was not published as printed, scientific edition yet. This article describes today’s editor dilemmas about making a critical edition of four first book contained in the first volume of autograph. Mainly it is focused on the problem of comparasion variants of particular texts, which often are very different.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.