Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  trade tax
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The tax climate of a jurisdiction may encourage or discourage potential investors. There are many tax factors taken into account by multinational enterprises when making location decisions. One of those factors is the possibility of creating a group for tax purposes. Consolidation allows two or more companies to be potentially considered as a single entity for tax purposes. The European Union and OECD member states offer tax grouping regimes on different conditions. This article reviews the German tax consolidation model and discusses requirements and options for that consolidation. Moreover, it compares German consolidation rules with the ones implemented in selected countries. The methodology of this article is determined by the research objectives and the research topic. The requirements for tax consolidation are specified in the law implemented in European countries. Hence, this article includes a legislative analysis of the regulations comprised in selected national acts. It also reviews the literature on the topic analysed, along with the statistical data collected by the German Federal Ministry of Finance in regard to the tax groups and their functioning.
|
2022
|
vol. 9
|
issue 56
269-290
EN
The introduction of a formulaically apportioned common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) could represent a milestone in international taxation. No agreement has yet been reached, however. In contrast, Germany already has a long-standing system that apportions corporate taxes by splitting trade tax and corporate income tax. This conceptual study, presented at the European Accounting Association (EAA) Congress in Bergen in 2022, will examine whether the German method of splitting could lead to some lessons for an appropriate design for an international profit distribu-tion formula.Methodologically, we use a two-step approach: First, we compare the designs, and then we juxtapose both on a factual level. Next, we ask what the objectives these mechanisms have; do they even coincide? If the goals are not comparable, one cannot indisputably serve as a model for the other. We determine that, even though there are partial deviations, a closer look reveals significant overlaps; however, the German implementation is far from consistent and prioritises practicability. This leads us to our main result: The German system makes a clear value decision towards practicabi-lity, although there is a different set of aims. For the implementation of formulaic EU profit sharing, the lesson to be learned is that practicability should play a central role in the design of the formula. This lesson is important and helpful to accompany and support the implementation process in the EU.
EN
The article presents the concept of tax in retail activities for stationary stores, depending on the size of the sales area and the number of population at a distance from the place of sale (location tax). It was assumed that it is possible to shape the balance in terms of demand (population) and supply (sales area) in order to avoid the monopolisation of the market by the largest entities. A solution has been proposed that the smaller the population with access to a given store location, the lower the tax should be for facilities with a small sales area and higher for facilities with a larger sales area. In turn, with an increasing number of population, the tax amount would be equal to different values of the sales area. In other words, the construction of the tax implies preferences, i.e. a lower tax for small stores in small towns, but in principle their lack or a very small impact in big cities. The tax should have a positive impact on the shaping of the settlement structure and rationalising retail network.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono koncepcję podatku w działalności sprzedażowej dla sklepów stacjonarnych, uzależnionego od wielkości powierzchni sprzedażowej i liczby ludności w odległości od miejsca sprzedaży (w skrócie: podatek lokalizacyjny). Założono, że możliwe jest kształtowanie równowagi pod względem popytu (ludność) i podaży (powierzchnia sprzedażowa) w celu uniknięcia monopolizacji rynku przez największe podmioty. Zaproponowano rozwiązanie, że im mniejsza liczba ludności z dostępem do danej lokalizacji sklepu, tym podatek powinien być niższy dla obiektów o małej powierzchni sprzedażowej oraz wyższy dla obiektów o większej powierzchni sprzedażowej. Z kolei przy coraz większej liczbie ludności wysokość podatku byłaby zrównywana dla różnych wartości powierzchni sprzedażowej. Innymi słowy, konstrukcja podatku zakłada preferencje, czyli niższy podatek dla małych sklepów w małych miejscowościach, natomiast w zasadzie ich brak lub bardzo małe oddziaływanie w dużych miastach. Podatek powinien mieć korzystny wpływ na kształtowanie struktury osadniczej poprzez racjonalizację sieci handlowej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.