Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  unethical behaviour
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

„Co mi ve škole vadí víc, podvádění, či klamání?“ Postoje žáků k nečestnému chování ve škole v kontextu školního podvádění

100%
Vrbová J.
Studia paedagogica
|
2013
|
issue 2-3
94-107
EN
In the spring of 2010, ninth graders (N = 401) of various lower secondary schools in Southern Bohemia fi lled in a questionnaire on unethical behaviour in schools. Based on the students’ self-reports on how often they had participated in behaviour that can be interpreted as cheating, two types of cheating were induced via exploratory factor analysis: cheating and deceiving. The questionnaires included two open-ended questions which were answered by 256 students. This paper analyses the students’ answers from the perspective of their approaches to particular instances of unethical behaviour. At the same time, the paper also puts them into the context of the afore-mentioned factors. The analysis of students’ answers has confi rmed that students tolerate more such a type of behaviour that is possible to describe as cheating and which mostly takes the form of students copying answers from other students. Two new fi ndings arise from students’ open-ended answers: fi rst, students strongly dislike teachers’ behaviour which they interpret as unfair to them (e.g. a teacher is favouring a given student or giving unannounced tests etc.) Second, the analysis has confi rmed a high degree of students’ tolerance towards cheating via the Internet.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Person–Supervisor Fit and Proactive Behavior and Unethical Behaviors

100%
Korulczyk T., Cooper-Thomas H. D.
Roczniki Psychologiczne
|
2020
|
vol. 23
|
issue 3
247-266
EN
This study examined how person–supervisor fit is related to employees’ proactive behavior and unethical behavior towards the organization. The study involved 321 employees representing various sectors in Poland. The participants completed the Person–Supervisor Fit Scale, Proactive Behavior Scale, and the Unethical Behavior Questionnaire. Results show that a supplementary fit is weakly and positively related to proactive behavior but is not related to complementary fit. Surprisingly, supplementary fit is weakly but positively related to unethical behavior, while complementary fit from a needs–resources perspective is weakly and negatively associated with unethical behavior. Conclusions may be applied to organizational settings challenged by the problem of employee unethical behavior and their low proactivity in the context of person–supervisor congruence.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.