Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland

100%
Biczkowski M.
Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development
|
2020
|
vol. 24
|
issue 4
232-244
EN
The main aim of this paper is a quantitative and structural comprehensive evaluation of LEADER projects presented in the context of local resources, which determine development opportunities. The issue has been discussed mainly from a geographical and spatial perspective. The impact of the LEADER approach on increasing the mobilisation of local communities and their use of rural resources was evaluated; as a result, this has enabled a bottom-up simulation of the development of local government units. The LEADER approach has substantially contributed to the mobilisation of local resources in rural areas (e.g. growth in the number Local Action Groups (LAGs) from 149 to 338). It was found that the involvement of LAGs had a positive impact on the activity of inhabitants (i.e. an increase in the number of initiatives undertaken, the absorption of European Union (EU) funds). The nature of the implemented projects demonstrates that LEADER combines investment actions with social projects. In general, it has been implemented more successfully in areas where investments are related to genuine needs and local resources.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rewitalizacja a Odnowa Wsi. Analiza porównawcza instrumentów Unii Europejskiej

63%
Biczkowski M., Biczkowska M.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica
|
2017
|
issue 29
27-45
EN
The article was devoted to a broader discussion of the substance of two rural development instruments financed by the European Union – renewal and revitalization of rural areas. Renewal and revitalization of rural areas are two important instruments for rural development, co-financed by the European Union under the Common Agricultural Policy (through the rural development program – rural renewal) and cohesion policy (through regional operational programs of individual voivodeships – revitalization). The article describes the features of both approaches, together with an indication of the similarities and differences that are associated with them. In addition, the answer to the question is how much each instrument influences the activation of the population and takes into account in the process of creating individual documents the participation of different social groups, public and private institutions, etc. Both approaches, though similar in purpose, do not duplicate or exclude, but Complementary and complementary.
PL
Artykuł został poświęcony szerszemu omówieniu istoty dwóch instrumentów związanych z rozwojem wsi, finansowanych ze środków Unii Europejskiej, tj. odnowie oraz rewitalizacji wsi. Odnowa i rewitalizacja to dwa ważne instrumenty rozwoju wsi, które są współfinansowane ze środków Unii Europejskiej w ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej (poprzez Program Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich – odnowa wsi) oraz polityki spójności (poprzez Regionalne Programy Operacyjne poszczególnych województw – rewitalizacja). W artykule dokonano charakterystyki obu podejść wraz ze wskazaniem podobieństw i różnic, które się z nimi wiążą. Ponadto udzielono odpowiedzi na pytanie, na ile każdy z instrumentów wpływa na aktywizację mieszkańców oraz uwzględnia w procesie tworzenia poszczególnych dokumentów udział różnych grup społecznych, instytucji publicznych i prywatnych itp. Obydwa podejścia – choć w założeniach podobne do siebie – nie dublują się ani nie wykluczają, ale uzupełniają się i są względem siebie komplementarne.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Agroturystyka jako forma aktywizacji pozarolniczej działalności gospodarstw rolnych w Polsce – stan, zróżnicowanie przestrzenne oraz wpływ środków PROW 2007-2013

63%
Rudnicki R., Biczkowski M.
Studia komitetu przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju PAN
|
2015
|
issue 162
83-108
EN
The article deals with the spatial analysis of the number of agritourist farms in Poland (9882 farms in 2014), taking into account the influence of both external, i.e. natural and man-made, and internal (according to the Agricultural Census of 2010) factors affecting agriculture, as well as the funds available thanks to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The study has been based on the ratio of agritourist farms which were established owing to the support of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development 2007–2013 to the total number of applications processed within the CAP aid measure of ‘Diversification and development of rural economic activities’; to the total number of agritourist farms; and to the total number of agricultural holdings with non-agricultural business activity. The analysis demonstrated a considerable territorial diversification of agritourism in Poland, which is related both to the areas with favourable conditions and to the development of the tourist function. It also showed an increase in the number of agritourist farms established in the regions which are not characterised by favourable conditions and which have so far remained on the sidelines of the major growth areas of the agritourist function
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Walory przyrodnicze i kulturowe a zróżnicowanie przestrzenne szlaków turystycznych w woj. kujawsko-pomorskim

63%
Rudnicki R., Biczkowski M.
Studia komitetu przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju PAN
|
2015
|
issue 166
115-139
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Działania PROW ukierunkowane na wsparcie działalności pozarolniczej – ocena zróżnicowania przestrzennego i innowacyjnego wpływu na rozwój obszarów wiejskich

51%
Rudnicki R., Biczkowski M., Dubownik A.
Studia komitetu przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju PAN
|
2016
|
issue 173
71-87
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Struktura obszarowa gospodarstw ekologicznych w Polsce – stan, zmiany, zróżnicowanie przestrzenne

51%
Wiśniewski Ł., Biczkowski M., Rudnicki R., Wiśniewski P.
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna
|
2024
|
issue 69
55-71
EN
The aim of the article is to assess the spatial diversity of the area structure of organic farms in Poland at the level of regions and communes, along with identifying the direction and pace of changes in 2012–2021. The basis for the study was data from the General Inspectorate of Trade Quality of Agricultural and Food Products (GIJHARS). Current trends and changes taking place in the size structure of organic farms are presented and described. It was found that their average area was 27.5 ha and varied at the regional level, from less than 15 ha in the province. Lublin, Lesser Poland and Podkarpackie, to over 40 ha in the Lower Silesia, Lubusz, Pomerania and West Pomerania. In the years 2012–2021, the average area of an organic farm in Poland increased by 2 ha (from 25.5 to 27.5 ha; an increase of 7.8 percentage points), i.e. 0.2 ha on average per year. It should be noted that in the same period, the average area of a traditional farm increased by 0.82 ha (from 10.38 to 11.20 ha in 2021; average annual increase – 0.09 ha), which indicates a much more intense growth rate of organic farms. It was found that the spatial arrangement of the processes of changes in the size structure of organic farms is very similar and constitutes an integral part of the size changes of all farms. However, a significant number of communes in which organic farms started or ended their operations in the organic production system during the period under study may indicate that organic farming is a phenomenon that is still developing its spatial structure. This, in turn, indicates the need for further research and monitoring of spatial phenomena related to organic farming, especially taking into account EU obligations and the increasing importance of this form of agricultural activity.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ocena zróżnicowania przestrzennego struktury obszarowej gospodarstw ekologicznych w Polsce na poziomie regionów i gmin wraz z rozpoznaniem kierunku i tempa przemian w latach 2012–2021. Podstawę badania stanowiły dane z Głównego Inspektoratu Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych (GIJHARS). Przedstawiono i opisano aktualne trendy i zmiany zachodzące w strukturze wielkościowej gospodarstw ekologicznych. Stwierdzono, że ich przeciętna powierzchnia wynosi 27,5 ha i jest zróżnicowana na poziomie regionalnym, od poniżej 15 ha w województwach lubelskim, małopolskim i podkarpackim, do ponad 40 ha w dolnośląskim, lubuskim, pomorskim i zachodniopomorskim. Wykazano, że zróżnicowanie przestrzenne przeciętnej powierzchni gospodarstw ekologicznych oraz jej zmian jest zbieżne z sytuacją obserwowaną w gospodarstwach konwencjonalnych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.