Search results

1

Nowe rozporządzenie dotyczące wyłączeń grupowych dla porozumień transferu technologii – jakie porozumienia z niego skorzystają?

100%

Knapp M.

internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny

|

2016

|

vol. 5

|

issue 1

114-123

PL

Przedmiotem artykułu jest przedstawienie najważniejszych zmian wprowadzonych przez rozporządzenie dotyczące wyłączeń grupowych dla porozumień transferu technologii z 17 kwietnia 2015 r. Omówienie rozporządzenia poprzedza analiza unijnego wyłączenia grupowego, które stanowi wzór dla polskiej regulacji oraz towarzyszących mu Wytycznych. Artykuł wskazuje zagadnienia, na które strony zawierające porozumienia transferu technologii powinny zwrócić szczególną uwagę ze względu na specyfikę rynku nowych technologii. Nowe rozporządzenie wymaga szczegółowej analizy, stąd opisane zagadnienia mogą pomóc uniknąć potencjalnych przeszkód czekających na nieostrożnych.

EN

The aim of this paper is to analyze key changes introduced by the new Polish Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (BER) of 17 April 2015. A year earlier, on 21 March 2014, the European Commission adopted its own revised Technology Transfer BER as well as accompanying Guidelines. The article briefly discusses the scope and structure of the EU BER since the new Polish legislation is modeled on EU rules. The paper identifies also which factors should be considered in particular by undertakings entering into technology transfer agreements in light of the special characteristics of these markets. The Polish BER requires a thorough analysis and so the issues discussed in this article may help interested parties to assess whether their agreements satisfy the requirements of the Polish BER.

2

Liability for Anti-Competitive Conduct of a Third Party under EU Competition Law

100%

Knapp M.

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

|

2018

|

vol. 11(17)

75-92

EN

The article discusses the framework of liability for anti-competitive conduct of a genuinely independent third party as set forth in relevant judgments. It refers to concepts of third party liability in the light of the principle of personal responsibility developed by doctrine and jurisprudence. The CJEU has set out important rules relating to liability of an undertaking for actions of its independent service provider. However, it still left some important issues unresolved. The paper focuses on the test for the attribution of anti-competitive conduct of a service provider and refers to its interpretation and application. It questions whether the introduced test provides sufficient legal certainty for undertakings. It briefs on the steps that must be taken by undertakings to distance themselves from an infringement and offers some suggestions how to limit or prevent exposure to liability

FR

L’article traite du cadre de la responsabilité d’un tiers véritablement indépendante pour un comportement anticoncurrentiel, tel qu’énoncé dans les jugements pertinents. Il fait référence aux concepts de responsabilité d’un tiers à la lumière du principe de la responsabilité personnelle développé par la doctrine et la jurisprudence. La CJUE a énoncé des règles importantes relatives à la responsabilité d’une entreprise pour les actions de son prestataire de services indépendant. Cependant, certaines questions importantes n’ont toujours pas été résolues. L’article se focalise sur le test d’attribution du comportement anticoncurrentiel d’un prestataire de services et se réfère à son interprétation et à son application. Il s’interroge sur le point de savoir si le test introduit offre une sécurité juridique suffisante aux entreprises. Il fait un résumé des mesures à prendre par les entreprises pour se distancer par rapport à une infraction et propose des suggestions sur la manière de limiter ou d’empêcher toute exposition à la responsabilité.

3

First ‘Gaetano Filangieri’ Conference on Freedom of Commerce ‘Recent developments in EU Competition Law’ Naples, 8–9 May 2018

63%

Knapp M., Jabłonowska A.

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

|

2018

|

vol. 11(17)

175-179

EN

On 8–9 May 2018 the University of Naples ‘Federico II’ (Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’) hosted the international conference ‘Recent developments in EU Competition Law’. The event, which gathered eleven speakers from eight different European universities and over fifty participants, marked the beginning of the ‘Gaetano Filangieri’ conference series, devoted to the late 18th Century Neapolitan jurist who, in his treatise The Science of Legislation (1780–1791), developed some pioneering ideas on monopolies, regulated professions, competition on the merits, and freedom of commerce.

4

Proving the Grounds for Compensation – Reflections on Private Enforcement in the Polish Cement Cartel Case. Case Comment to the Judgment of the Court of Appeals in Cracow of 10 January 2014 (Ref. No I ACa 1322/13)

63%

Knapp M., Korycińska-Rządca P.

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

|

2017

|

vol. 10(15)

251-268

EN

Despite the fact that the right to full compensation of harm caused by the breach of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU was confirmed in European Union jurisprudence many years ago, and that actions for damages for competition law infringements were admissible in Poland also before the transposition of Directive 2014/104/EU (hereinafter, the Damages Directive), the number of reported court cases regarding private enforcement of competition law is very low. The commented judgment of the Court of Appeals in Cracow (Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie) of 10 January 2014 is one of the very few judgments of Polish courts regarding actions for damages for an infringement of competition law.

Refine search results

3 Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

1 internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny

4 Knapp M.

1 Jabłonowska A.

1 Korycińska-Rządca P.

2 2018

1 2017

1 2016

Nowe rozporządzenie dotyczące wyłączeń grupowych dla porozumień transferu technologii – jakie porozumienia z niego skorzystają?

Liability for Anti-Competitive Conduct of a Third Party under EU Competition Law

First ‘Gaetano Filangieri’ Conference on Freedom of Commerce ‘Recent developments in EU Competition Law’ Naples, 8–9 May 2018

Proving the Grounds for Compensation – Reflections on Private Enforcement in the Polish Cement Cartel Case. Case Comment to the Judgment of the Court of Appeals in Cracow of 10 January 2014 (Ref. No I ACa 1322/13)