Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Odpowiedzialność ekologiczna jako istotny obszar ludzkiej odpowiedzialności – wymiar lokalny i globalny

100%
Marek-Bieniasz A.
Studies in Global Ethics and Global Education
|
2015
|
issue 3
16-28
EN
In the era of global ecological crisis responsibility for the state of the biosphere (ecological responsibility) stands as one of the most important areas of human responsibility. It is impossible to analyze the phenomenon of environmental responsibility in isolation from the phenomenon of responsibility at all (in general) and its ontic conditions. The carried out analysis of the selected ontic conditions of taking responsibility demonstrates the conditions for taking ecological responsibility. This analysis allows to explain i.a. the close relationship between incurring ecological responsibility at the local and global levels. Ecological responsibility is always carried out at the local level but it has both local and global meaning due to the effects of complying or non-complying with ecological responsibility. These effects should be borne in mind in the process of making decisions about education, politics, or economy in such a way that that they do not increase the existing ecological risk.
PL
W sytuacji globalnego kryzysu ekologicznego odpowiedzialność za stan biosfery (odpowiedzialność ekologiczna) jawi się jako jeden z najważniejszych obszarów ludzkiej odpowiedzialności. Nie sposób analizować fenomenu odpowiedzialności ekologicznej w oderwaniu od fenomenu odpowiedzialności w ogóle (w sensie ogólnym) i jej ontycznych uwarunkowań. Przeprowadzona analiza wybranych ontycznych warunków ponoszenia odpowiedzialności ukazuje warunki ponoszenia odpowiedzialności ekologicznej. Prowadzi ona m.in. do wyjaśnienia ścisłego związku pomiędzy ponoszeniem odpowiedzialności ekologicznej w wymiarze lokalnym i globalnym. Odpowiedzialność ekologiczna realizowana jest zawsze w wymiarze lokalnym. Ma przy tym i lokalne, i globalne znaczenie ze względu na skutki wywiązywania się lub niewywiązywania się z odpowiedzialności ekologicznej. Skutki te należy mieć na względzie w procesie podejmowania decyzji dotyczących edukacji, polityki, gospodarki czy ekonomii, tak by niosły one ze sobą jak najmniejsze ryzyko ekologiczne.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Education And The Deepening Of The Axiological Crisis In The Course Of Globalization

100%
Marek-Bieniasz A.
MIND Journal
|
2017
|
issue 3
1-10
EN
Globalization as both a social and a historical phenomenon is undoubtedly manifested as one of the determinants of the axiological crisis. The positive and negative consequences of globalization in the axiological realm certainly exist, and reflection on them and their connection with the education of modern man is needed. Knowledge of values must be one of the foundations of education for the members of modern globalizing societies. The acquisition of the axiological competence by the student is, however, multi-step. Different stages of education, for various reasons, are sometimes too short. The student may feel alienated and treated objectively. To effect this can be to take away from certain values such as constancy, sense of security, sense of community and others. These are typical threats in globalizing societies, which must be countered. Education plays an indispensable positive role in defining what, on the basis of what values, shape the future of humanity and the world that it creates.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Etyka środowiskowa a etyka tradycyjna. Różne ujęcia relacji

100%
Marek-Bieniasz A.
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
|
2015
|
vol. 13
|
issue 2
29-43
EN
This article highlights and explains the major models of the relations between environmental ethics and traditional ethics. These models include: environmental ethics confronting models with traditional ethics, environmental ethics spacer model relative to traditional ethics, and models indicating the existence of correspondence disciplines. Present in thefirst phase of the development of environmental ethics, “distancing” in relation to traditional ethics contributed, as can be seen today, a peculiar relationship between traditional ethics and environmental ethics existed from the very beginning. In a sense, it can be said that, thanks to the development of traditional ethics, the development of environmental ethics was possible after some time. Environmental ethics can therefore see, inter alia, as a discipline biased against traditional ethics internally (e.g., as a form of ethics detailed, complementary circle of traditional ethics issues important ecological crisis issues).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.