Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
Basing his argumentation on Freud’s essay Civilisation and Its Discontents, the author poses a question about the essence of suffering which appears when the Law of the Father is suspended and no longer protects against the death drive. The author formulates a thesis that in the contemporary social space, abandoned by the Law of the Father, it is disciplinary practices that play a key regulative role, pretending to form the relations based on the law. These practices transform the drive energy of Thanatos, which then finds its embodiment in the everyday lifelessness of bureaucracy, the coolness of rules and the excess hidden beneath them. The answer to this situation is Eros, which drives people to community – yet not so much in the form of a family as of an infinite and noneconomic continuum of local games of love and death.
EN
The author of the article concentrates on the relationship between the father figure, the law of a father and political identities in a postcommunist and Western Europe. The argument is grounded in a psychoanalytical discourse, particularly in Jacques Lacan’s conceptualizations (and his followers), concerning an imaginary and symbolic order, an incoherent symbolic field and tension between an ideal ego and ego ideal.
FR
Dans l’article l’auteur se concentre sur la question de la relation entre la figure du Père / la loi du Père et les identités politiques dans l’Europe postcommuniste et occidentale. La réflexion est enracinée dans le discours psychanalytique, et en particulier dans les conceptualisations de Jacques Lacan (et ses successeurs), concernant les ordres : imaginaire et symbolique, l’incohérence du champ symbolique et la tension entre l’idéal du moi et le moi idéal.
EN
The Nietzschean perspective was revealed with great power in the French thought of the second half of the 20th century. In my opinion, it also allows to grasp the basic dispute in which post-structuralism would be involved with the representatives of the Warsaw School of the History of Ideas if it entered such dispute. In its centre Nietzsche’s figure of Socrates could be placed and the function Nietzsche assigned to him while explaining the fall of tragedy. The thinkers departing from Marxism in the sixties and seventies of the twentieth century could choose “Socratic” path, one could think such was the destiny of the Warsaw School of the History of Ideas. Another possibility was created by the perspective of criticism of reason in the Nietzschean spirit, characteristic of French thinkers. The author wonders about the circumstances in which the choices were made.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.