Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Rocznik Tomistyczny
|
2020
|
vol. 2
|
issue 9
229-237
EN
Presented paper contains the critical edition of the question Utrum universal nihil sit aut posterius suis singularibus of the Collectanea de anima preserved in MS. BJ 2118. Collectanea de anima is a provisional title of the collection of 6 questions dealing with the problem of the soul, composed in Krakow in the 2nd half of the 15th century. This manual has a heterogenic character, since every question differs from the others regarding its form, multidimensionality of undertaken issues and the degree of doctrinal independence. Surely, the 3rd question edited here (precisely its part that has been preserved till today, i.e. the introduction and first passage of articulus 1) is not too original work and does not include any remarkable statements. But yet, it is an important testimony of work of compilers, that nowadays only uncommonly is a subject of studies. The edited text in general is doctrinally dependent: first of all, it is based on the works by Thomas Aquinas, Albert the Great and Alexander Bonini of Alexandria (the author explicitly quotes these sources), but also on treatises by Heymericus of Campo and Pseudo-Aquinas (their works are not induced by the author). Concerning the substance of the edited question, the most interesting and “original” is a kind of ignorance of the historical background of the problem of universals and the occurrence of quite numerous mistakes. Mostly they can be easily explained, since they often arise from improper decipheration of abbreviation, overinterpretation or basing on a corrupted source. The accumulated mistakes lead the author to draw his own (singular) conclusions, that all testify the correctness of the Aristotle’s sentence: Parvus error in principio maximus erit in fine.
Rocznik Tomistyczny
|
2020
|
vol. 2
|
issue 9
239-247
PL
Artykuł jest edycją krytyczną łacińskiej kwestii: Utrum universale nihil sit aut posterius suis singularibus zachowanej w rękopisie BJ 2118 w zbiorze Collectanea de anima
PL
This thesis was based on the documents that were provided by the Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Aairs and were signed by the ambassador of Polish People’s Republic in Paris. The narration in this correspondence between the embassy in Paris and Warsaw has got its own unique style and can be really interesting for the reader. e materials that were provided from the Archive, were compared with the available literature. However it is just a small percentage on the information about 20th century France. e thesis shows the condition of France in the late 1950s. The main protagonist is Charles de Gaulle but the reader’s attention is focused mainly on his environment: co-workers, political allies, his friends and opponents. Because of that, the paper is focused more on the internal policy of France, rather than the foreign policy of this country.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.