Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author analyzes main issues of legal regulation of entrepreneurship in the late Middle Ages. At the beginning, the concepts of “law merchant” and “commercial law” were compared. The author then indicated the signifi cance of Roman law and its reception for the law used by entrepreneurs and presented the basic information about maritime law, borough rights and market jurisdiction. The issues of typology of commercial companies, development of banking and beginnings of the bankruptcy law were also studied. Finally, the author concluded that without a ruling factor, it was impossible to regulate entrepreneurship in the Middle Ages. The ideas about the self-regulating of merchant estate, autarkic lex mercatoria and exclusive trade courts are not completely false, but they are exaggerated. The participation of public authorities in the regulation of entrepreneurship has been irreplaceable.
EN
The article focuses on one of the consilia by Alexander Tartagnus de Imola, a 15th-centry doctor of both laws, concerning partnership. The principle of a partnership is that participation in it is voluntary. In Roman law it was defined as a consensual contract, i.e. one based on an agreement between the parties (consensus). What should we do, however, when a partner we trusted when the contract was concluded introduces another partner? The answer provided by Roman law was very clear: Socii mei socius meus socius non est (the partner of my partner is not my partner). The consilium presented in the article is an interesting example of the application of the Roman principle of socius socii mei socius meus non est in 15th-century legal doctrine. It demonstrates the durability of the tradition of thinking about partnerships since ancient times.
DE
Gegenstand dieses Artikels ist ein der Consilien des Alexander Tartagnus de Imola, Doktor für beide Rechte aus dem 15. Jahrhundert, das die Gesellschaft betrifft. Für eine Gesellschaft gilt, dass die Beteiligung an ihr freiwillig ist. Das römische Recht betrachtete sie als einen Konsensvertrag, also einen, der auf der Verständigung der Parteien (consensus) basiert. Was aber, wenn der Gesellschafter, dem wir bei dem Vertragsschluss vertraut hatten, einen neuen Gesellschafter dazu nehmen wird. Das römische Recht hatte hierauf eine deutliche Antwort: Socii mei socius meus socius non est (Gesellschafter meines Gesellschafters ist nicht mein Gesellschafter). Das in diesem Artikel präsentierte consilium ist ein interessantes Beispiel für die Anwendung des römischen Grundsatzes socius socii mei socius meus non est in der Rechtslehre des 15. Jahrhunderts. Es zeigt die Beständigkeit der Tradition bei der Betrachtung der Gesellschaft seit der Antike.
EN
The article describes the life and work of Robert Joseph Pothier, who lives in the consciousness of the French as "the father of the Civil Code." This article is intended to present the impact of the work of Pothier on the Napoleonic Code, French jurisprudence and civil law outside of France. Through in-depth and long-term study of Roman law and customary law, Pothier had acquired unusually extensive theoretical knowledge that complemented his practice. His life revolved around the interpretation of the law, and he could boast sizable achievements in this area. Pothier, acting under the influence of several intellectual trends of his time, especially the natural law school, was able to reorganize the Digest of Justinian and the Customs of Orleans as well as to spend many years of quiet, prudent and humble work composing numerous treatises. Fortunately, he lived long enough and worked so assiduously that he was able to describe the whole of private law. When the time came for the unification of civil law in France, his works were the source from which the members of the codification commission took their formulations, especially in the field of contract law. However, it seems that the work of Pothier was more suited to interpreting individual legal regulations rather than resolving legislative disputes, as there is not extensive ideological discourse in his work. The works of Pothier embody the ideal of the desire to serve society by clear and unbiased interpretation of the law.
EN
Cloud computing is a model of leveraging IT resources offered by providers via the Internet. In this model, small and medium-sized enterprises are able to transfer the costs of building and maintaining IT infrastructure to third parties. The IT resources are available on demand, and the consumers pay merely for the resources actually used. A key factor limiting the adoption of cloud computing are security concerns. However, these concerns should be collated with the security benefits possible to achieve thanks to the cloud’s characteristics. This paper presents an analysis of the risks and benefits in the area of security related to cloud computing implementation in companies and an overview of initiatives aimed at increasing the awareness in this area.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.