Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 11

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Historia@Teoria
|
2016
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
19-42
EN
Th e topic of text is the problem of Prussian cultural heritage of Lower Silesia, seen from two diff erent perspectives. First, the historical moment of this heritage appearing is introduced and second, the way of its contemporary presence and connected cultiural problems. As a key study were discussed from both perspectives: evangelical church in Karpacz so-called Wang Temple (brought in fi rst half of XIX-th century by Prussian king Wilhelm III from Norway) – nowadays under protection of polish evangelical parish; also: life and charity work of Marianna Orańska – owner of the castle in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki and neighbourhood grounds – nowadays touristic route leading on the borderland of Poland and Czech Republic, following in Marianna’s steps and history of evangelical community from Tyrol, brought to Mysłakowice by Prussian king Wilhelm III – nowadays Tyrol’s House lead by Zierthall commune from Austria.
EN
The essay refers to the relationship between methodology of history and academic and school history didactics as a result of the reflection which Wojciech Wrzosek undertakes in his book entitled: About Historical Thinking. Wojciech Wrzosek’s reflection dedicated to the term ‘historical thinking’ is related to the meaning of this category as useful and instructive in the field of the history didactics. The changes in the contemporary historiography offer a new vision of the past and new manners of understanding the past, are also able to develop the need for a systematic reflection in the field of history didactics. Historiography understood as crossing the traditional scientific frameworks of history is also the way to re-define historical thinking as the key category of the history didactics. The main topic of this essay is to offer the cultural perspective of interpretation of history in education. It is also an attempt to reconstruct the model of historical thinking in contemporary history textbooks narrations.
PL
Artykuł koncentruje się na problemie kronik rodzinnych i ich cech konstytutywnych. Kroniki rodzinne są jedną z form narracji prywatnych, poświęconych historii rodzinnej, która ze względu na podstawę źródłową i warsztatową bliska jest pracom uznawanym przez historiografię. Zagadnienie omówione zostało na przykładach kronik dwudziestowiecznych w szerszym kontekście innych form gatunkowych należących do kategorii historii rodzinnych.
EN
This article centres on the issue of family chronicles and their distinctive features. The chronicles fall into the category of private narratives dealing with family history which, in view of the sources and research rules on which they are based, come close to works recognized as falling within the field of historiography. Drawing on examples of twentieth-century chronicles, the author analyses the issue in the broad context of other genre forms belonging to the category of family histories.
EN
This article deals with the problem of representing prominent historical figures in selected biographical works by Walerian Kalinka and Adam Skałkowski. The author’s concern is with demonstrating how changing narrative strategies were used by these scholars to represent national heroes and what influence their general vision of history exerted upon the way in which they created particular historical portraits. A separate strand of analysis concerns the historical figures’ private memory, shaped through family interactions, and the influence it exerted upon the creation of their official biographies.
PL
W artykule poruszony jest problem kreacji wybitnych postaci historycznych w wybranych biografiach autorstwa Waleriana Kalinki i Adama Skałkowskiego. Analiza i interpretacja prowadzona jest w kierunku ukazania zmieniających się strategii narracyjnych zastosowanych w tych biografiach oraz pokazania, jak obraz dziejów, z którym utożsamia się historyk, może wpływać na sposób kreacji bohaterów. Oddzielnym wątkiem jest problem pamięci prywatnej, kształtowanej w kręgu rodzinnym przedstawionych postaci historycznych i jej wpływu na powstanie oficjalnej biografii.
Historia@Teoria
|
2017
|
vol. 1
|
issue 3
53-60
EN
The article att empts to defi ne the history of historiography as a subdiscipline of history; it indicates the numerous competences of historians of historiography which are nessesary for undertaking an (auto)refl ection around the history of their discipline, for touching the theoretical and methodological aspects of historiography, and for the study of historicity of historiographical texts. Th e author asks about the current status of the history of historiography and new horizons of research. Regarding the fi eld of changes in the ways of comunication, she sees potential chances for increasing the interest of new recipients in the history of historiography. The author amplifi es the weft of reception, understood as a phenomenon that belongs to the comunication situation occuring between the author of transmission and his recipients. The author refers to the inspiration of the methodological conception of the school of reception aesthetics from Constance (W. Iser, R. Jauss) and the hermeneutics of H-G. Gadamer. Reception is a new concept for presenting the history of historiography as a fi eld of research on the historicity of historical works.
EN
The article deals with the direct and indirect influence of pre-academic and academic criticism on the formation of public opinion in evaluating historical works and the demand for a particular image of the national past in the nineteenth century. The author argues in favour of the supposition that a vital role in transmitting information about historical works produced under the Partitions and in exile was played by the daily and periodical press. It was only with the professionalisation of historical research that criticism moved to specialised periodicals, thus narrowing the discussion on historiography’s shape to the specialists’ milieu.
PL
Tematem artykułu jest bezpośredni i pośredni wpływ krytyki przednaukowej i naukowej na kształtowanie opinii publicznej w zakresie oceny prac historycznych i zapotrzebowania na określony obraz przeszłości narodowej w XIX stuleciu. W artykule przytoczono argumenty na rzecz tezy, że istotną rolę w przekazie informacji o pracach historycznych powstających pod zaborami i na emigracji odegrała prasa codzienna i periodyczna. Dopiero wraz z profesjonalizacją badań historycznych krytyka przeniosła się do wyspecjalizowanych pism, zawężając tym samym dyskusję nad kształtem historiografii do kręgu specjalistów.
EN
The issues raised in the article focus on the ways of communicating family narratives from the perspective of reflection on this type of historical writing by the history of historiography. An expression of this reflection is the proposed classification of narrative strategies and genre types of narration within the set of family histories, and the conceptual category of family histories, which captures this set and opens the field for further discussions on the phenomenon of private family narratives.
EN
The article deals with the problem of family histories, which are understand and consider here in double sense. Firstly, as a sort of private story, whose subject is history of the family and people writing it are not often professional historians. In this meaning, family history is a record of memory defined as communicative memory. Second meaning of family histories, refers to understand them as specific kind of historical writing, on the verge of oral history and private history. In this meaning family history by such authors as Maria Czapska or Edward Raczyński from record of communicative memory transforms in private history, about what decides the presence of various historical sources, which authors convert in their historical narration, placing them in wider cultural context of several periods. Chosen examples illustrate and explain both meaning senses of family histories, and moreover, additionally introduce the weft of postmemory in modified and widen meaning beyond sense used by Marianne Hirsch.
EN
The paper presents the phenomenon of academic books on history that mass readers have deemed to be worth reading, thus making them a kind of history bestsellers, when it is rare for academic books written by historians to enjoy mass acclaim. In her analysis, the author emphasizes those features of bestsellers that follow from their publishers’ commercial expectations. The analysis concerns the following books, among others: Europa (Europe) and Bo¿e Igrzysko (God’s Playground) by Norman Davies, Historia OEwiata od 1917 roku (A History of the Modern World from 1917 to the 1980s) by Paul Johnson and Historia Polski 1918–1980 (History of Poland from 1918 to 1980) by Andrzej Alber.
10
75%
Historia@Teoria
|
2016
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
7-9
EN
Wstęp
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.