Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Tekst jest recenzją książki: G.W.F. Hegel, Wykłady z filozofii religii, t. 1, przeł. Ś.F. Nowicki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006.
EN
Text is an review of a book: G.W.F. Hegel, Wykłady z filozofii religii, t. 1, przeł. Ś.F. Nowicki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006.
EN
The article is a comparative study of selected elements of three philosophical positions which arose on the theoretical underpinning of the concept of transcendental idealism: Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s Theory of Knowledge, Edmund Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology, and Marek J. Siemek’s transcendental philosophy. The primary aims of the study are to examine the epistemological assumptions underlying the three positions, and then critically reconstruct and bring into focus their metaphilosophical component. The article seeks to corroborate the titular thesis that transcendentalism as an epistemological position provides the concepts discussed here with a theoretical framework for a radically conceived interpretation of metaphilosophical discourse.
EN
Metaphilosophy as a research discipline is concerned with the overall metatheoretical reflection of philosophy on its own subject matter, assumptions, methodology, and goals guiding this form of human intellectual activity. The aim of this article is to present a cross-sectional analysis of the main stages in the historical development of this discipline, and offer a general characterization of the current state of research. The means to achieving this goal of study is a confrontation between two partly competitive and partly complementary paradigmatic approaches to metaphilosophical reflection which currently determine a relatively wide range of interests in this theoretically promising and heuristically fertile field of philosophical analysis.
EN
The aim of the paper is to discuss the current status of academic humanities (specifically philosophy) in the modern system of science and higher education. The recent structural reforms carried out in this sector in Poland had the ambitious goal of bringing the Polish universities in line with the current trends observed in academic education systems in developed countries, and improving the global competitiveness of Polish science. The article is an attempt at a critical confrontation of these strategic intentions with the actual effects achieved through the reforms, primarily in the context of the profound transformations of the very concept of science that has historically accompanied these changes. In particular, the paper presents a methodological analysis of the impact of the postulated new interpretation of research on the scientific status to date – and the prospects for further development – of traditional humanistic disciplines.
EN
Tadeusz Kroński (1907-1958) was one of the most influential representatives of Polish post-war  Hegelianism. He was also regarded as the spiritual father of the Warsaw school of the history of ideas. In the 1950s, Kroński published historico-philosophical analyses focused on the ideas propounded by 19th centuryPolish Messianists of the inter-uprising period, presenting an outright negative view on the movement. Kroński does not see any significant features of theoretical continuity between the tradition of 19th century Polish Hegelianism, shaped by historical influences of the Romantic Messianic ideology (as formulated by Libelt and Cieszkowski), and his own philosophical position. The present study is aimed at a critical verification of Kroński’s analyses. It seeks to investigate the origins of the assumption regarding the fundamental discontinuity of both historical lines of development of Polish Hegelianism. Also, an attempt is made to delineate the actual extent of realization of the postulate of radical rejection of Messianic ideas.
PL
Tadeusz Kroński (1907-1958) – jeden z najbardziej wpływowych przedstawicieli powojennego heglizmu polskiego, uznawany za ojca duchowego warszawskiej szkoły historyków idei, w swoich publikowanych w latach pięćdziesiątych XX wieku historyczno-filozoficznych analizach myśli dziewiętnastowiecznych mesjanistów polskich epoki międzypowstaniowej przedstawia skrajnie negatywny obraz tego nurtu. Kroński nie dostrzega istotnych rysów ciągłości teoretycznej między ulegającą historycznym wpływom romantycznej ideologii mesjanistycznej tradycją dziewiętnastowiecznego heglizmu polskiego (spod znaku Libelta i Cieszkowskiego) a własnym stanowiskiem filozoficznym. Tekst podejmuje próbę weryfikacji krytycznej tych analiz, zbadania genealogii założenia o zasadniczej nieciągłości obu tych historycznych linii rozwoju heglizmu polskiego, a także określenia faktycznego zakresu realizacji formułowanego tu postulatu radykalnego odrzucenia idei mesjanizmu.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest myśl historiozoficzna Stanisława Garfeina-Garskiego – polskiego filozofa i prawnika przełomu XIX i XX wieku. Tekst zawiera między innymi rekonstrukcję głównych elementów struktury filozofii historii, przedstawionych systematycznie w pracy Uwagi nad zagadnieniem dziejów powszechnych i polskich (1924), oraz charakterystykę koncepcji filozofii narodowej tego myśliciela. Zasadniczym celem prezentowanej analizy jest próba kompleksowego ujęcia znaczenia ideologii mesjanistycznej w rozważaniach filozoficznohistorycznych Garskiego oraz bliższego określenia miejsca i roli tego stanowiska w dynamice historycznego sporu o mesjanizm polski.
EN
The paper addresses the problem of historical role and impact of John Paul II’s teachings on the dispute over Polish messianism which has been consistently present in the Polish literature and philosophy over the past two centuries. The article is an attempt to determine the pope’s actual contribution to the development of the idea of Polish messianism, and evaluate the ultimate significance of this contribution within a broad perspective of the evolution of Polish political thought during the latter part of the twentieth and early decades of the twenty first centuries. The starting point in the discussion is the contemporary historical-philosophical research in this field, and the final conclusions are oriented towards the philosophical qualification of the most recent attempts to revive the messianist ideology on the basis of papal thought.
EN
The paper attempts a theoretical confrontation of two paradigms underlying contemporary historical reflection on the development of Polish philosophical and religious thought: the traditional paradigm of history of philosophy, and the paradigm of history of ideas which predominates in more recent research (and, to a certain extent, constitutes an alternative to the former). What is the general methodological status of scientific procedures employed within each of these approaches? Are these approaches qualitatively akin, i.e. aiming towards relatively equivalent cognitive goals using different theoretical means, or essentially competitive? Is there a mutual genealogical relationship underpinning the evolution of these paradigms? And finally, what factors determine the process of evolution from a metaphysical perspective? The aspects enumerated above, as well as other considerations related to the general problem outlined in the title of the paper, will constitute an attempt to assess the current state of research in this field.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.