Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Pragmatyka i teorie

100%
Neuger L.
Wielogłos
|
2008
|
vol. 2
|
issue 4
PL
PRAGMATICS AND THEORIESIn my essay I focus on conceptions which cannot be inscribed in the concept of „useful goals” and usefulness. To put things bluntly: (by defi nition) openness to unquenchable desires is a negation (also by defi nition) of realizable needs. The question which I pose in the essay is: whether an institution such as a university (faculty, department etc.) is able to realize and in what way both the philosophy of desires and needs (usefulness and utility). Or, to put it differently: whether the humanities of desires has a chance to survive in a world which demands utility and is governed by it
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Co nam szepcze Syrena Czechowa? O nieuchronności „niemożliwego” tworzenia humanistyki

100%
Neuger L.
Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia
|
2011
|
vol. 12
197-203
EN
.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Come le “scarpe di Chełmek” divennero “cut-rate sneakers”. Tradurre ciò che è locale in ciò che è locale

100%
Neuger L.
pl.it / rassegna italiana di argomenti polacchi
|
2017
|
issue 8
204-210
4
Content available remote

What is Chekhovs Siren Whispering to Us? On the Unavoidability of the ‘Impossible’ Creation of the Humanities

100%
Neuger L.
Wielogłos
|
2012
|
vol. 2
|
issue 12
PL
The focus of my reflections on hermeneutics and the humanities is the short story or comic tale by Anton Chekhov entitled “The Siren” (1887) where we encounter two irreconcilable conceptions of representation; the story contains within it a philosophical aporia, but makes no attempt one way or another to resolve it. I believe that the non-metaphysical “adhesion” of this aporia is precisely its humour. Is such a humorous hermeneutics of uncertainty (of oneself) or such a comic approach to what we call the humanities, which is not sceptical because it to a certain extent a priori affirms the world as well as one’s own imperfection, at all possible? If I understand Chekhov correctly, then he confronts us with the problem of the uinavoidability of precisely this “impossible” creation of the humanities.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.