Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Najlepszy czy najgorszy z możliwych światów? Studium porównawcze systemów ﬁlozoﬁcznych G.W. Leibniza i A. Schopenhauera

100%

Czerkawski A.

Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia

2007

vol. 2

issue 1

9-20

The article discusses the views of two great philosophers, Georg W. Leibniz and Arthur Schopenhauer. In his optimistic system, Leibniz perceived the world as created by God. Schopenhauer, in his pessimism, claimed that God does not exist and that the world is ruled by the irrational Will. Surprisingly, the opposing views of Leibniz and Schopenhauer converge in the area of ethics, for both of them consider good action and compassion toward each other the most important things. The author claims that the convergence of their moral standpoints can be explained by their common discovery the metaphysical mystery of being.

Ryzyko, kryzys, trauma jako przedmiot oddziaływań reprezentantów profesji pomocowych – wybrane konteksty społeczne i psychologiczne

63%

Bielska E., Czerkawski A.

Studia Edukacyjne

2016

issue 40

163-176

The analysis covers chosen social (structural, systemic) and psychological determinants of the risk, crisis and trauma. Analysis emphasizes the factors essential from the perspective of activities realized by the representatives of social aid professions. It indicates the main risk factors of crisis and trauma, protective factors and chosen preventive and aid-related strategies realized in the crisis and trauma contexts (related to the different levels of their potential incidence).

Refine search results

1 Studia Edukacyjne

1 Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia

2 Czerkawski A.

1 Bielska E.

1 2016

1 2007

Search results

Najlepszy czy najgorszy z możliwych światów? Studium porównawcze systemów ﬁlozoﬁcznych G.W. Leibniza i A. Schopenhauera

Ryzyko, kryzys, trauma jako przedmiot oddziaływań reprezentantów profesji pomocowych – wybrane konteksty społeczne i psychologiczne