Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the Polish legal system, the principles of acquiring professional qualifications by graduates were regulated primarily in the Act of 17 July 2009 on graduate practices. The provisions of this Act raise serious doubts of an interpretative nature, mainly due to the lack of a clear and comprehensive indication of the legal regime of the graduate practice contract. Meanwhile, determining what legal provisions, as well as how they apply to the graduate practice contract is of great importance, because in the event of an erroneous legal qualification of such a contract, its parties are exposed to far-reaching legal consequences. Due to the carried out considerations it was assumed that the graduate practice contract is a labor law contract, to which civil law provisions should be applied by analogy (in addition to the provisions of the Act of 17 July 2009 on graduate practices and labor law provisions mentioned in this Act). The Author also formulated de lege ferenda postulates.
EN
The article consists of a brief and introductory analysis of the model of introspection as the source of cognition of natural law which is based on personalist anthropology. The model of such cognition stems mainly from the phenomenological anthropology of Karol Wojtyła, but is not restricted to his philosophy. The author strongly believes that the Wojtyła’s “Person and Act”, published in 1969, opened a new era in Christian philosophy as it shows the way to overcome the subjectivist crisis of the Western philosophy and it enables us to rebuild the classical philosophy, using phenomenological and personalist anthropology. This vision also embraces human subjectivity without losing the objective character of natural law. In doing so, it contributes to enriching the Thomistic concept of natural law. Transcendence and integration of a person into a human act (actus humanus) – as Wojtyła sees it – becomes a fundamental condition of proper human cognition and – what is more important – of proper human action.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy poznania prawa naturalnego na drodze personalistycznej introspekcji i personalistycznego dialogu. Autor stawia tezę, iż negacja klasycznej metafizyki, jaka ugruntowała się w nowożytności, znajdując swój szczyt w myśli postmodernistycznej, w rezultacie prowadzi do alienacji człowieka w sferze nie tylko jego pracy, ale też w całej jego sferze duchowej. W tym kontekście filozofia dialogu była tylko częściową odpowiedzią na te problemy, rodząc się z inspiracji religijnych (Buber, Rosenzweig) oraz antytotalitarnych (Levinas). Filozofii tej brakuje bowiem oparcia się o antropologię personalistyczną, co pozwalałoby na przejście od bytu do powinności, tj. od poznania człowieka do określenia jego powołania etycznego oraz do ujęcia jego celów prawno-naturalnych. Według autora poprzez nowoczesne, fenomenologiczno–psychologiczne ujęcie ludzkiego doświadczenia to właśnie Karol Wojtyła już w połowie XX wieku zbudował podwaliny pod nową personalistyczną koncepcję etyki i prawa naturalnego, zakorzenione w tradycji klasycznej, ale jednak już ją przekraczające. Zdaniem autora artykułu tylko pełne ujęcie ludzkiego doświadczenia – duchowego, aksjologicznego, etycznego i prawnonaturalnego poprzez poznanie samego siebie (introspekcja personalistyczna) oraz innych (dialog personalistyczny) we wszystkich sferach osoby (intelektualno – duchowej, somatycznej, emocjonalnej) daje możliwość współpracy ludzkiej w budowaniu dobra wspólnego.
EN
The article concerns cognition of natural law in the process of personalistic introspection and personalistic dialogue. The author points out that the negation of metaphysics that was established in modernity, achieving its zenith in the post-modern thought, leads as a result to alienation of a human being, not only in the sphere of his work, but in his whole spiritual sphere. In this context dialogical philosophy was only a partial answer to these problems, being born out of religious (Buber, Rosenzweig) or anti-totalitarian inspirations (Levinas). This philosophy is not based upon personalistic anthropology which would enable to go from being to obligation, i.e. from cognition of a human being to specifying his ethical vocation and his natural law aims. In the author’s opinion it was Karol Wojtyła in the middle of the 20th century who built the foundations of the new personalistic concept of ethics and natural law through a modern phenomenological and psychological approach of human experience. This concept was rooted in the classical tradition, but it exceeded this tradition at the same time. In the author’s opinion only the full approach of human experience which means spiritual, axiological, ethical and natural law experience through self cognition (personalistic introspection) and cognition of other people (personalistic dialogue) in all spheres of a person (intellectual – spiritual, somatic and emotional) gives a possibility for human cooperation in building a common good.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.