Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

СТАНОВЛЕННЯ ХАРКІВСЬКОГО ДЕРЖАВНОГО ПЕДАГОГІЧНОГО ІНСТИТУТУ ПІД КЕРІВНИЦТВОМ ЙОГО ПЕРШОГО ДИРЕКТОРА Й.Г. ПОДОЛЬСЬКОГО (1931–1934 рр.)

100%
Олена Л.
Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології
|
2016
|
issue 9(63)
73-85
XX
The article presents the main activities of Joseph H. Podolskyi as the first director of Kharkiv Institute of Education (KIE) and Kharkov State Pedagogical Institute (KSPI) in 1931–1934, at that time the leading metropolitan pedagogical institute. For the first time the structural and substantial changes at the university were revealed, its becoming under the supervision of personnel, training and educational system of work, which helped to create effective at the time the higher education institution with highly qualified teaching staff, 6 departments and 13 chairs. This is confirmed by J. Podolskyi’s competent efforts to expand the institute, to form new departments, divisions, chairs, offices, receiving and engagement of new academic buildings and hostels, with the opening counseling centers in areas for extramural students. The real is his significant contribution to the development and improvement of curricula and programs, the optimal organization of the educational process, the work of student assets, prompting an academic discipline, strengthening the accounting and control of educational work of students and teachers. J. Podolskyi is remarkable for professional maturity, his dedication to work and effectiveness of management. Under hard political and socio-economic conditions of a totalitarian state J. Podolskyi did his best to provide a high-quality professional education of teachers. J. H. Podolskyi took a short and at the end a tragic walk of life. In memory of descendants he will always remain one of the founding fathers and first rector of Kharkiv State Pedagogical Institute. For modern teachers, for higher pedagogical school the experience of Pedagogical Institute Director Podolskyi and his colleagues has been for a long 30 years an example of a positive lesson of future teachers’ education under conditions of economic and social problems that today have not pass our universities and schools. It should be thoroughly and without jaundice studied the system of management of the educational process of the university created by Podolskyi including the organization of students’ independent work, features of their constant cooperation with professors and assistants, ways of control and stimulation of the future teachers’ learning achievements and responsibilities.
2

ПРОФЕСІЙНО-ТВОРЧА ПІДГОТОВКА МАЙБУТНЬОГО ВЧИТЕЛЯ В ЕВРИСТИЧНІЙ ОСВІТІ

63%
Олена Л., Микола Л.
Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології
|
2016
|
issue 10(64)
55-68
EN
The main purpose of the university training of the future teacher we defined as an achievement in specially created social and educational conditions of personal spiritual maturity, motivational readiness, procedural and technological capacity for successful professional and creative self-actualization. The teacher can consider this self-actualization the constant generation, personally meaningful creative educational products in different kinds and situations of teaching and education of the younger generation of the future socially useful self-actualizators. The achievement of this goal is unreal under conditions of the existing traditional (bureaucratic, transmissive, reproductive and monological) education system. Therefore, the authors based on the results of many years theoretical and experimental researches reveal the main productive possibilities of innovative, non-standard system of heuristic education. This education has been firmly established in foreign and national educational science and educational practice with problems and sufficient resistance in the last decade. The creative teacher training in heuristic education is supported by powerful motivational and procedural personality-oriented factors. Assessment of the future teachers is mainly the result of created and publicly protected educational products (works, stories, projects of the lessons and educational affairs, models of heuristic conversation on professional subjects, discussion, debates, articles, reviews, summarizing tables, charts, devices, etc.). These educational products are provided by thoroughly elaborated protected in dissertations and monographs publications by the tools of diagnostic and criterion. The number and quality of educational products created by students are the purpose of heuristic education and professional and creative criteria of the future teacher’s self-actualization. The knowledge and skills (as distinct from traditional education) are not the aim of professional education but the main instrument to achieve it. The article describes the necessary components of realized experience of heuristic education: organization on the new basis of cognitive, creative and research work of students, including the lectures of direct action as fundamentally new dialogic educational and cognitive structures of active reading, discussion and creation with the teacher of their own detailed and reduced effective knowledge; at the seminars and practical classes where students mainly present and defend their own professional and creative products; in reorganized pedagogical practice of active interaction of students with scholars and teachers-experimenters, with the development of professional skills in the creation and diagnostics of significant for them and for school educational developments, projects, articles on the results of the work of educational publications and others. The measures for the solution of revealed major problems in training of the future teachers, especially the creation of innovative and democratic educational environment with the introduction of the new requirements for academic freedom and responsibilities of students and teachers are offered in this scientific work. Besides, the introduction of the new forms of lectures and practical classes (in time and methodological dimensions), new approaches to continuous pedagogical practice, evaluation of the students for the quality of created professional educational products, creation of the necessary conditions (according to the requirements of the Bologna process) for organization and control of students’ independent work by the teachers are suggested in this article
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.