Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article is a critical reconstruction of the early period of Zygmunt Haupt’s artistic life against the background of the intellectual and artistic life of Lviv in the 1930s. Lviv’s political, social, and cultural situation in the 1930s was very complicated. It was a multinational and vibrant urban center, but it was marked by probably the most serious national animosities in the Second Polish Republic. Literature and the study of literature in the city were rather conservative. In the mid-1930s, however, the intellectual and artistic life of the city began to change. Against the background of these changes, the article discusses the nature of Haupt’s early career and his connections with the literary group called Rybałci. At the same time, it attempts to answer the questions to what extent the Lviv period turned out to be formative in Haupt’s artistic life and what artistic and social significance Rybałci had for Haupt, among whom he was not a leading figure.
PL
Artykuł prezentuje krytyczną rekonstrukcję wczesnego okresu twórczości Zygmunta Haupta na tle życia intelektualnego i artystycznego Lwowa w latach 30. XX wieku. Lwów był wówczas miastem o bardzo skomplikowanej sytuacji polityczno-społecznej i kulturalnej. Stanowił wielonarodowy, barwny ośrodek urbanistyczny, ale był naznaczony bodaj najpoważniejszymi animozjami narodowościowymi w II RP. We Lwowie wciąż trwała stagnacja w dziedzinie literatury i nauki o literaturze. W połowie lat 30. życie intelektualne i artystyczne miasta zaczęło się jednak zmieniać. Artykuł na tle tych przemian naświetla charakter wczesnych przedsięwzięć artystycznych Haupta i jego związków z grupą literacką zwaną Rybałtami. Podejmie przy tym próbę odpowiedzi na pytania, w jakim stopniu okres lwowski okazał się formacyjny w życiu artystycznym Haupta oraz jakie znaczenie artystyczne i towarzyskie mieli dla Haupta Rybałci, wśród których nie był on przecież personą pierwszoplanową.
EN
The article is an interpretation of the aquatic rhetoric in the works of a Ukrainian writer, Yurii Andrukhovych. The first part of the article is an analysis of the discursive project of European unification, a real integration between theWest and Central Europe, especially Ukraine. The rhetorical figures of that unification in the author’s texts are the rivers, the Danube in the first place. The second part of the article is a critical discussion of the obstacles that, in the perspective of the author, stand on the way to the unification in question: the condition of contemporary Ukraine and theWest’s attitude to the “worse” part of the continent.
EN
The article aims at considering Central Europe and appreciating it in connection with the category of the South. This means the change from the horizontal, parallel paradigm, which imposes the necessity of defining Central Europe by reference to the East and West, to the vertical, meridian paradigm, enabling the creation of the myth of Central Europe, where the main reference point are the Balkan nations. A look at the South as a counterpoint to the opposition East – West has its antecedents in the 30s of the 20th century. In the Polish prose created after 1989, especially in the works of Andrzej Stasiuk, it is possible to specify the elements of the myth of the South as the basis of the myth of Central Europe, such as: themes of Austria-Hungary, the idea of civilization of the Danube, the creation of the Gypsies as cultural heroes and the specifically transformed topos of the “poetry of ruins”. 
PL
Artykuł dotyczy prób myślenia o Europie Środkowej i dowartościowania jej w związku z kategorią Południa, czyli zmianą horyzontalnego, równoleżnikowego paradygmatu, narzucającego konieczność definiowania Europy Środkowej przez odniesienie do Wschodu i Zachodu, na paradygmat wertykalny, południkowy, umożliwiający stworzenie mitu środkowoeuropejskiego, w którym głównym punktem odniesienia są nacje bałkańskie. Spojrzenie na Południe jako na kontrapunkt dla opozycji Wschód – Zachód ma swoje antecedencje w latach 30. XX w. W prozie polskiej powstałej po 1989 r., zwłaszcza utworach Andrzeja Stasiuka, można wskazać elementy mitu Południa jako podstawy mitu Europy Środkowej, takie jak: motywy cekańskie, idea cywilizacji naddunajskiej, kreacja Cyganów na bohaterów kulturowych i specyficznie przekształcony topos „poezji ruin”.
EN
The article presents various ways of ideologization of the Central (Boyko and Lemko regions) and Eastern (Hutsul region) Carpathians in interwar Poland. After the Polish-Ukrainian War (1918–1919), that part of the Carpathian mountain range was situated in the Second Polish Republic. In contrast to the Tatras, which played the role of Polish national landscape, the Carpathians were alien to Poles in terms of ethnicity and culture. Thus, the Polish authorities, as well as touristic and local lore organizations, sought and largely managed to transform these mountains into a domestic landscape, which was no center of national identity but constituted an important spot on the mental map of the Polish national community, recognized as an undeniable part of Polish statehood. The article shows how the exoticization of the Carpathians, state holidays, and the development of state-funded mass tourism resulted in the increased sense of familiarity between Polish lowlanders and highlanders and, consequently, the symbolic inscription of the Carpathians into the Polish domain and common imagination.
PL
In the first place, the main identifications of residents of Austrian Galicia in the period between 1772 and 1918 are discussed; emphasised is the fact that diverse individual hierarchies of identification could be formed. Then, it is shown in what ways these identification directions surfaced in the specified local dimension – namely, in the town of Drohobycz (today Ukrainian Drohobych), in the specific historical moment – that is, during the 1911 election for the Vienna Parliament. On this occasion, the local elite carried out the election of their own candidate, contrary to what the majority of local dwellers demanded – which resulted in protest actions and unusual alliances between the locals. Given the exemplary occurrence with its limited place and time framework, the article seeks to analyse the sympathies and antipathies among the Galicians, which tended at times to be astonishing and not necessarily followed the lines of ethnic/national and political divisions. The argument has it that what was happening tended to be contrary to the image of the conflict that split the province’s three main ethnic groups, on the one hand, and the vision of a concordant coexistence between Poles, Ukrainians, and Jews, on the other.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.