Search results

1

Komentarz do dekretu Trybunału Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii c. Morán Bustos z dnia 26 marca 2007 r. zarządzający przyjęcie sprawy o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa do zwyczajnego postępowania w II instancji

100%

Białobrzeski T.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2015

|

vol. 26

|

issue 1

97-111

EN

Presented decree of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain was based on the can 1682 § 2 CCL and article 265 § 5 of Dignitas Connubii. The justices in this decree refer to the case about the nullity of the marriage due to ordinary examination in a new grade of trial (article 265 § 1 Dignitas Connubii). Presented document shows the very thorough treatment of the case on the just starting appeal. In comprehensive way, according to norm of laws the reasons that were expressed briefly and indicated that further instruction were required (article 265 § 5 Dignitas Connubii). In addition it contains part in iure, in which the judge refers to the title from which the case was carried on in the I instance, i.e. to lack of discretion of judgment (no inner freedom) as to essential marital rights and obligations.

2

Nieważność małżeństwa oraz niezaistnienie małżeństwa w kanonicznym porządku prawnym

75%

Dzierżon G.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2001

|

vol. 12

|

issue 6

7-31

EN

L'attenzione dei legislatore nel sistema matrimoniale canonico si concentra fra l'altro sul argomento dell'invalidita dei matrimonio. Ē noto che in questo ordine tutti i matrimoni celebrati in validamente entrano nella categoria di matrimonio invalido. Si deve aggiungere che, per quanto riguarda il diritto processuale, il legislatore tratta tutti questi patti matrimoniali in modo uguale, senza alcuna distinzione. Perciò i matrimoni che entrano che nella cattegoria di matrimonio invalido richiedono la dichiarazione di nullite ottenuta presso i tribunali ecclesiastici. Però l'applicazione della teoria del atto giuridico al sistema matrimoniale canonico ci ha permesso di individuare tre forme dell'invalidita del patto coniugale, cioè: la inexistentia dei consenso matrimoniale, il difetto dei consenso matrimoniale e l'invalidita causata dagli impedimenti matrimoniali. Nel sistema matrimoniale canonico funziona anche altra categoria, cioè inexistentia matrimonii. Tali sono il matrimonio civile e quello religioso celebrato dinanzi ad un ministro non cattolico in circostanze nelle quali deve essere celebrato secondo la forma canonica ordnaria a norma del с. 1117. Paragonando questo fenomeno con l'invalidità del matrimonio osserviamo che questi matrimoni non possono essere ammessi nei tribunali ecclesiatici - nemmeno essere trattati per il processo documentale (c. 1686 - 1688). Quindi l'ommisione totale della forma canonica non entra nella cattegoria dell'invalidita del matrimonio, cos pseudo - coniugi sono liberi per celebrare il matrimonio con terze persone, senza particolari formalite, tranne quelle communi alla pratica prematrimoniale (c. 1065 - 1071). Tali casi dal punto di vista teorico contengono tutti gli elementi essenziali dellatto giuridico, maunelemento estrinseco, cioè la legge irritante rende il consenso giuridicamente inefficace. Quindi quei matrimoni non producono alcun effetto giurdico nel sistema matrimoniale canonico.

3

Zasady opracowywania opinii biegłego psychologa w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

75%

Krupa W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1996

|

vol. 7

|

issue 6/1

137-142

4

Przyjęcie skargi o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa

75%

Sobański R.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1996

|

vol. 7

|

issue 6/1

143-152

5

Wpływ organicznej impotencji kobiecej na nieważność małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pinto z 27.10.1995 r.

75%

Dzierżon G.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2000

|

vol. 11

|

issue 5

211-216

EN

Si trata di una sentenza rotale pro nulliate, emanata dal titolo del can. 1084. Il ponente rotale ha concentrato la sua attenzione alla questione d ’impotenza organica femminile. Questo impedimento impedisce il matrimonio in forza del diritto naturale. II ponente rotale sottolinea che si deve distinguere l’impotenza fisica da quella funzionale. Soltanto la l’impotenza antecedente e perpetua causa la nullità del matrimonio.

6

Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa czy prośba o jego unieważnienie? Refleksja kanonistyczno-duszpasterska na kanwie introductio causae

75%

Góralski W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2014

|

vol. 25

|

issue 3

77-90

EN

At the time of rapid and numerous social changes at the turn of XX and XXI century it, not only serious lacks in knowledge of doctrine and church discipline regarding marriage, including its indissolubility, but also the overwhelming divorce friendly mentality have been noted, which applies to Catholics as well. No proper preparation to conclude marriage has been noticed too. These circumstances encourage conclusion of marriage recklessly, which reflects in its durability. The unfavorable factor of preserving marriage indissolubility is also disability to overcome first difficulties experienced in the marriage. The author indicates more and more popular phenomenon of filing motions to ecclesiastical church for dissolution of marriage and focuses on the necessity of their reasonable and lawful selection in the initial phase of court proceedings.

7

Okoliczności dopuszczające rozpoznanie sprawy o nieważność małżeństwa w procesie skróconym przed biskupem

75%

Nowicka U.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2015

|

vol. 26

|

issue 3

43-60

EN

Article 14 § 1 Ratio procedendi ((the official explanation which accompanied the new norms Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus) sets forth the various types of cases which qualify to be instructed according to the briefer process before the Bishop according to cann. 1683-1687. Among the circumstances includes for example: the defect of faith which can generate simulation of consent or error that determines the will; a brief conjugal cohabitation; an abortion procured to avoid procreation; an obstinate persistence in an extraconjugal relationship at the time of the wedding or immediately following it; the deceitful concealment of sterility, or grave contagious illness, or children from a previous relationship, or incarcerations; a cause of marriage completely extraneous to married life, or consisting of the unexpected pregnancy of the woman, physical violence inflicted to extort consent, the defect of the use of reason which is proved by medical documents, etc. The circumstances are analyzed in this article.

8

Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus – nadzieje i obawy sądownictwa kościelnego w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

75%

Nowakowski B.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2015

|

vol. 26

|

issue 3

25-41

EN

The article reflects upon the question of modifications in canonical matrimonial processes caused by pope Francis’ motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Some of the issues brought up by the author are: changes of tribunals’ competences in matrimonial cases, collegiality of the tribunal, the sufficiency and enforceability of the sentence after the affirmative decision of the first instance and both the positive and negative effects of designing a briefer form of trying nullity cases called processus matrimonialis brevior coram Episcopo.

9

Brak rozeznania oceniającego - przyczyną nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej z 16 X 1988 r. c. Bruno

75%

Góralski W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1991

|

vol. 2

88-101

EN

L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza definitiva del turno rotale (pronunciata in terza istanza) c. Bruno il 16 dicembre 1988 in causa Meliten, di nullità del matrimonio „ob gravem defectum discretionis indicii” dal convenuto. Le nozze delle parti furono celebrate il 12 agosto 1944. Dopo il divorzio civile (1976) l’attrice aveva accusato la nullità del suo matrimonio presso il tribunale di prima istanza „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii” nonché „ob exclusionem boni fidei” dal marito. Il 15 aprille 1980 il tribunale si è prounciato „pro invaliditate”ma solo „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii”. L’appello interposto alla Rota Romana provcó la sentanza negativa - dai due titoli di invalidità - il 1 marzo 1984. Apellato il nuovo turno rotale ha dichiarato la nullità del matrimonio, come è stato detto sopra. La sentenza definitiva è stata dunque pronunciata perfino dopo 44 anni dalla celebrazione delle nozze.

10

Metus reverentialis jako tytuł nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Erlebach z 13 grudnia 2007 r.

75%

Góralski W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2015

|

vol. 26

|

issue 1

77-95

EN

The author presents and comments on the judgment of the Roman Rota c. Erlebach in the matter of nullitatis matrimonii, which was passed on 13 December, 2007 in the third instance as per reverential fear (timor reverentialis). It is about the marriage concluded on 22 September, 1992 by Katarzyna and Jan. In this relationship which was concluded against the intentions of the woman one baby was born. Joint life of spouses was progressing very badly, therefore, the couple sought temporary separation several times. The definite separation of spouses took place in July, 1998 after almost six years from the conclusion of the marriage.On August 24, 1998 Katarzyna turned to the ecclesiastical court of first instance for the court to decide about the invalidity of her marriage, not indicating any other invalidity title; while she broadly presented facts regarding her case. The case was heard de facto with consideration paid to the fear on the side of the plaintiff. Having heard the plaintiff and three witnesses on her side as well as the defendant and then after taking subsequent stages of the process on 31 December, 2001 the court gave a negative judgment.After submitting by the woman of the appeal to the court of appeal and after another court hearing of Katarzyna’s mother on 14 October, 2003 the judgment was positive, while the case found its way to the Roman Rota (as the third instance), where the rota Turnus c. Erlebach (the remaining judges were A. Ciani and J. Ferreira Pena) on 13 December, 2007 issued a pro nullitate judgment.

11

Duchowny jako świadek w procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa

75%

Dappa R.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2015

|

vol. 26

|

issue 2

73-84

EN

The central part of cases to declare the nullity of marriage is investigation. Code of Canon Law enumerates following evidence: the declarations of the parties, proof through documents, witnesses and testimonies, experts, judicial examination and inspection, presumptions. Among these the most popular in cases to declare the nullity of marriage are undoubtedly witnesses and testimonies. It is true that can. 1549 CIC prescribe very wide the possibilities of using these means, however not everyone might be a witness. Among few categories of people unable to witnessing at court, the law enumerates inter alia, priests. However this inability is not absolute and it results from the specific character of pastoral ministry. Main interest of present compilation is an analysis of can. 1548 CIC and can. 1550 CIC according to cleric persons. An inability to witnessing at court resulting from the secrecy of confession, and exemption from obligatory testimonies resulting from conducting sacred ministry, are two basic categories limiting the possibility of calling a clergyman in testimony. The present compilation comprises an attempt of analysis of practical usage of these legal norms.

12

Powołanie biegłego do udziału w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

75%

Dzięga A.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1992

|

vol. 3

70-79

EN

Nel Codice di Diritto Canonico si usa la parola „peritus” nel senso largo e ,,pe- ritus” nel senso stretto del termine, cioè perito giudiziale. Per essuere un perito nel senso largo ci vuole la scienza teoretica, accademica, oppure la scienza realmente posseduta, almeno la scienza pratica, l’esperienza. Un perito giudiziale dovrebbe avere la scienza teoretica, accademica, ed essere un vero esperto nel metodo scientifico, poiché un perito nel senso largo è spesso anche il giudice stesso. Lo scopo specifico dell’opera del perito giudiziale è dare la vera relazione scientifica sui capitoli definiti dal giudice.Il perito giudiziale è chiamato al processo nel modo fondamentale oppure nel modo supplementare. Il modo fondamentale consiste in questo: il giudice con un decreto speciale nomina il perito, quando lo decide il diritto (secondo il can. 1680) o lo stesso giudice consultando le parti oppure secondo la proposta delle parti stesse, e chiede al perito una relazione scritta e l’esame giudiziale. Eallora la vera prova ufficiale. Nel modo supplementare invece la parte propone la relazione scritta fatta fuoriprocesso, che il giudice deve accettare, oppure la parte chiama il perito privato sempre con il beneplacito del giudice stesso. In questo caso basta la relazione scritta e l’esame non è più necessario, però può essere richiesto.

13

Udział stron procesowych w ustaleniu formuły sporu w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

75%

Dzięga A.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1992

|

vol. 3

55-69

EN

Le parti processuali nelle cause matrimoniali sono l’attore e il convenuto. Il difensore del vincolo ha nel processo i diritti analoghi. In werità la lite si svolge invece fra la costatazione della presunzione della legge: „il matrimonio N.N. è valido” e la tesi dell’attore: „il mio matrimonio è invalido”. In questa lite il difensore prende la parte della validità del matrimonio. Il convenuto invece può difendere la validità del matrimonio o impugnarlo insieme con l’attore oppure essere assente.Con il termine „litis contestatio” si definisce la sola decisione con la quale il giudice stabilisce la formula del dubbio oppure tutta la fase preliminare del processo fino al decreto della litis contestatio. Q uesta fase può svolgersi nei modi seguenti: 1. La corrispondenza fra il giudice e le parti processuali finita col decreto della contestatione della lite; 2. Il decreto del giudice in base al solito libello introduttorio; 3. La sessione davanti al giudice finita col suo decreto; 4. Nelle cause più difficili: la corrispondenza fra il giudice e le parti con la successiva sessione finita col decreto del giudice.Durante la fase della litis contestatio a ll’attore ed al convenuto spettano i seguenti diritti: 1. Prendere l’iniziativa processuale; 2. Scegliere il modo di procedere chiedendo la sessione; 3. Suggerire al giudice la formula del dubbio; 4. Accettare la formula del dubbio stabilita dal giudice. Inoltre nella fase dell’istruzione le parti possono chiedere il cambiamento della formula del dubbio. Al difensore del vincolo spettano i diritti uguali oltre che suggerire qualcun titolo d ’invalidità del matrimonio.

14

Uwarunkowania środowiskowe związku przedślubnego i małżeństwa a opiniowanie w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa przed Sądem Biskupim

75%

Cynkier P.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2014

|

vol. 25

|

issue 2

63-88

EN

Aim of the work: Analysis of the premarital relationship with consideration of individual factors of the prospective spouses, their level of social acceptance and their influence on the image and duration of the engagement period and marriage. Evaluation of the relation between social situation of the spouses and the breakdown of marriage. Material and method: Material included 68 cases of marriage annulment, which were proceeded by the Bishop Court in years 2007-2012. Complete court records and psychiatric-forensic examinations of complainants and defendants were analyzed. Information was coded in specially developed questionnaire, through which in systematical way the data was collected, classified, the frequency of occurrence of chosen factors was cataloged and essential correlations between them were examined by means of statistical analysis. Conclusions: The course of engagement period and decision about betrothal did not have connection with the examined environmental factors. Duration of the marriage did not have any connection with chosen material-domestic and environmental factors. Majority of couples did not dispose of own accommodation what did not result from the material situation. The younger men and women were while contracting a marriage the longer was its duration. Among the analyzed group of marriages there is no data to recognize the environmental factors, which are commonly considered to be attributable to the occurrence of mental disorders. Etiology of the disorders should be researched by expert witnesses in other spheres.

15

Zaburzenia depresyjne jako przyczyna niezdolności konsensualnej do zawarcia małżeństwa

71%

Leszczyński G.

Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne

|

2013

|

vol. 22

115-124

EN

Taking up the issue of depresion as a cause for declaring a marriage null and voit, the author begins his reflections with a look at psychosis. From the point of view of marriage validity, of special significance is also the analysis of depresion with very particular medical aspects. The cause of nullity of a marriage discussed here, in turn, requires a rather precise definition of depresion and the factors by which it may be triggered. The last part of the author’s reflections is devoted to the analysis of canon 1095 of the Code of Canon Law, especially to the definition of cases when this depresion is serious enough to exclude marriage validity.

16

Waginizm jako przyczyna nieważności małżeństwa w świetle kan. 1084 KPK z 1983 r.

63%

Wybult W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2017

|

vol. 28

|

issue 2

47-63

EN

Sexual disorders of women are a broad problem contended by many specialists of different disciplines. Vaginismus is one of the diseases of this type. It is a disorder hampering or making the sexual intercourse impossible. By virtue of the cause, it may appear in two types: as organic and inorganic i.e. psychogenic vaginismus.On the basis of the canon law a vaginismus can become a cause of the marital impediment or the inability for assuming substantial conjugal duties. In case of organic vaginismus (always when woman lacks vagina), whether or not this lack was replaced with the artificial vagina or not, the woman shall be recognized as impotent. Thus, marriage entered by her (assuming that the requirements of pre-existence, permanence and certainties are met) is void. The same applies to the case of the underdevelopment of the vagina.However, talking about psychogenic vaginismus the distinction shall be made between their different stages (most difficult, heavy, less difficult and light cases). In first three cases we are dealing with the situation when the woman certainly isn’t able to co-exist and to accept ejaculate. Therefore, an obstacle of impotence exists. In fourth however, the situation can look in two ways depending on the individual case. Irrespective of that, by virtue of the high percentage of vaginismus effective curing, some of the specialists indicate that nowadays the existences of impotence obstacle is in decline.

17

Udział adwokata w procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

63%

Sobański R.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1997

|

vol. 8

|

issue 2

125-144

18

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach coram Sobański /z pominięciem daty/ w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu podstępnego wprowadzenia w błąd /kan. 1098/

63%

Sobański R.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1994

|

vol. 5

111-118

EN

Si pubblica “in extenso” la sentenza affermativa /“constat de nullitae matrimonii”/ del Tribunale Metropolitano di Katowice dal titolo dell’errore provocato dall’inganno /circa la gravidanza della oratrice/.

19

Natura procesów o nieważność małżeństwa oraz zadania trybunału w ich prowadzeniu : papież Jan Paweł II do Roty Rzymskiej 22 I 1996 r.

63%

Góralski W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1997

|

vol. 8

|

issue 2

87-93

20

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku /fragment/ coram Gręźlikowski /z pominięciem daty/ w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu wykluczenia istotnego przymiotu małżeństwa /dobra wierności/ - kan. 1101 § 2

63%

Gręźlikowski J.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1994

|

vol. 5

121-126

EN

Il Tribunale Diocesano di Włocławek ha pronunziato la sentenza affermativa / “constat de nullitae matrimonii” / nella causa di nullità del matrimonio dal titolo della esclusione della fedeltà matrimoniale dalla parte del convenuto. Quella sentenza viene pubblicata “in extenso”.

Refine search results

Komentarz do dekretu Trybunału Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii c. Morán Bustos z dnia 26 marca 2007 r. zarządzający przyjęcie sprawy o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa do zwyczajnego postępowania w II instancji

Nieważność małżeństwa oraz niezaistnienie małżeństwa w kanonicznym porządku prawnym

Zasady opracowywania opinii biegłego psychologa w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

Przyjęcie skargi o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa

Wpływ organicznej impotencji kobiecej na nieważność małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pinto z 27.10.1995 r.

Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa czy prośba o jego unieważnienie? Refleksja kanonistyczno-duszpasterska na kanwie introductio causae

Okoliczności dopuszczające rozpoznanie sprawy o nieważność małżeństwa w procesie skróconym przed biskupem

Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus – nadzieje i obawy sądownictwa kościelnego w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa

Brak rozeznania oceniającego - przyczyną nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej z 16 X 1988 r. c. Bruno

Metus reverentialis jako tytuł nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Erlebach z 13 grudnia 2007 r.

Duchowny jako świadek w procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa

Powołanie biegłego do udziału w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

Udział stron procesowych w ustaleniu formuły sporu w kanonicznym procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

Uwarunkowania środowiskowe związku przedślubnego i małżeństwa a opiniowanie w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa przed Sądem Biskupim

Zaburzenia depresyjne jako przyczyna niezdolności konsensualnej do zawarcia małżeństwa

Waginizm jako przyczyna nieważności małżeństwa w świetle kan. 1084 KPK z 1983 r.

Udział adwokata w procesie o nieważność małżeństwa

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach coram Sobański /z pominięciem daty/ w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu podstępnego wprowadzenia w błąd /kan. 1098/

Natura procesów o nieważność małżeństwa oraz zadania trybunału w ich prowadzeniu : papież Jan Paweł II do Roty Rzymskiej 22 I 1996 r.

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku /fragment/ coram Gręźlikowski /z pominięciem daty/ w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu wykluczenia istotnego przymiotu małżeństwa /dobra wierności/ - kan. 1101 § 2