PL EN


2013 | 22/1 | 19-33
Article title

The Formalist Roots of Stanley Fish’s and E. D. Hirsch’s Hermeneutics

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
The paper investigates the extent to which Stanley Fish’s constructivism and E. D. Hirsch’s hermeneutics are similar in their assumptions and program. Although it is commonly accepted that they constitute polar opposites of literary theory, Fish and Hirsch are embedded in the theoretical discourse of New Criticism’s approach to literary studies and develop in a form of critique of the formalist stance. The problems they encounter and the way they approach literary texts are shaped by formalist assumptions that eventually lead to serious discrepancies between their postulated theory and practice. Both theories of interpretation seem to be operating within a similar framework of ideas which determines their understanding of the problems regarding literary studies as well as their solutions. What appears to be even more important is that the ‘‘textual” theoretical framework itself causes serious problems for both programmes of literary hermeneutics.
Contributors
  • University of Silesia
References
  • Dasenbrock, Reed Way. 1993. “Do We Write the Text We Read?”, in: Literary Theory After Davidson. Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 18–37.
  • Davidson, Donald. 1973. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme”, in: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 47 (1973–1974), 5–20.
  • Davidson, Donald. 1993. “Locating Literary Language”, in: Literary Theory After Davidson. Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.), 295–309.
  • Drong, Leszek. 2007. Disciplining the New Pragmatism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communitie. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hermeren, Göran. 1977. “Intencja a interpretacja w badaniach literackich”, in: Pamiętnik Literacki, Vol. LXVIII, No. 4, 1977, 353–383.
  • Hirsch, E. D. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Hirsch, E. D. 1976. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hirsch, E. D. 1982. “The Politics of Theories of Interpretation”, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 1, September 1982, 235–247.
  • Hirsch, E. D. 1985. “Against Theory?”, In: Against Theory. W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), 48–53.
  • Kalaga, Wojciech. 2001. Mgławice dyskursu. Kraków: Universitas.
  • Knapp, Steven and Benn Michaels, Walter. 1985. “Against Theory”, in: Against Theory, W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), 11–31.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-0529348c-551f-40af-8b68-7e031645cf32
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.