Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2012 | 8(15) | 159-165

Article title

Joanna Marszałek-Kawa (red.), W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, Toruń 2012



Title variants

Languages of publication









Physical description


  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu


  • Asrlan R., Geopolityczne i geostrategiczne znaczenie Turcji wobec UE, [w:] W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, red. J. Marszałek-Kawa, Toruń 2012, s. 400.
  • Bachmann V., Sidaway J.D., „Zivilmacht Europa”: A Critical Geopolitics of the European Union as a Global Power, „Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. New Series” 2009, vol. 34, nr 1, s. 94–109.
  • Bäcker R., Nietradycyjna teoria polityki, Toruń 2011, s. 83.
  • Bouton M.M., India’s Problem Is Not Politics, „Foreign Affairs” 1998, vol. 77, nr 3, s. 80–93.
  • Bouzarovski S., East-Central Europe’s Changing Energy Landscapes: A Place for Geography, „Area” 2009, vol. 41, nr 4, s. 452– –463.
  • Chey H-K., The Changing Political Dynamics of East Asian Financial Cooperation. The Chiang Mai Initiative, „Asian Survey” 2009, vol. 49, nr 3, s. 450–467.
  • Chung Ch.P., Japan’s Involvement in Asia-Centered Regional Forums in the Context of Relations with China and the United States, „Asian Survey” 2011, vol. 51, nr 3, s. 407–428.
  • Cruz De Castro R., The 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and the Revival of Populism/Neo-Populism in 21st Century Philippine Politics, „Asian Survey” 2007, vol. 47, nr 6, s. 930–951.
  • Dereń k., Stosunki UE–Azja. Wzrost znaczenia Azji we współczesnym świecie, [w:] W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, red. J. Marszałek-Kawa, Toruń 2012, s. 69.
  • Dunlop J.B., Aleksandr Dugin’s „Neo-Eurasian” Textbook and Dmitrii Trenin’s Ambivalent Response, „Harvard Ukrainian Studies” 2001, vol. 25, nr 1/2, s. 91–127.
  • Erturk K.A., Overcapacity and the East Asian Crisis, „Journal of Post Keynesian Economics” 2001/2002, vol. 24, nr 2, s. 253–275.
  • Friedberg A.L., The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?, „International Security” 2005, vol. 30, nr 2, s. 7–45.
  • Hall I., India’s New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power and the Limits of Government Action, „Asian Survey” 2012, vol. 52, nr 6, s. 1089–1110.
  • Hamilton-Hart N., Asia’s New Regionalism: Government Capacity and Cooperation in the Western Pacific, „Review of International Political Economy” 2003, vol. 10, nr 2, s. 222–245.
  • Hellmann D.C., A Decade After the Asian Financial Crisis: Regionalism and International Architecture in a Globalized World, „Asian Survey” 2007, vol. 47, nr 6, s. 834–849.
  • Herrmann R.K., American Perceptions of Soviet Foreign Policy: Reconsidering Three Competing Perspectives, „Political Psychology” 1985, vol. 6, nr 3, s. 375–411.
  • Hira A., Should Economists Rule the World? Trends and Implications of Leadership Patterns in the Developing World, 1960–2005, „International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique” 2007, vol. 28, nr 3, s. 325–360.
  • Jendraszczak E., Azja XXI wieku na drodze do przywództwa w świecie o nowym porządku, [w:] W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, red. J. Marszałek-Kawa, Toruń 2012, s. 7, 44.
  • Kennedy A.B., China’s Perceptions of U.S. Intentions toward Taiwan: How Hostile a Hegemon?, „Asian Survey” 2007, vol. 47, nr 2, s. 268– 287.
  • Kherallah M., Beghin J., U.S. Trade Threats: Rhetoric or War?, „American Journal of Agricultural Economics” 1998, vol. 80, nr 1, s. 15–29.
  • Knights D., O’Leary M., Leadership, Ethics and Responsibility to the Other, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2006, vol. 67, nr 2, s. 125–137.
  • Kuştepeli y., Income Inequality, Growth, and the Enlargement of the European Union, „Emerging Markets Finance & Trade” 2006, vol. 42, nr 6, s. 77–88.
  • Marszałek-Kawa J. (red.), Is the 21st Century the Age of Asia? Deliberations on Security, Toruń 2012, ss. 250.
  • Marszałek-Kawa J., Gawłowski R. (red.), Ewolucja azjatyckiej polityki bezpieczeństwa, Toruń 2012, ss. 448.
  • Milani M.M., Tehran’s Take: Understanding Iran’s U.S. Policy, „Foreign Affairs” 2009, vol. 88, nr 4, s. 46–62.
  • Mistry D., Diplomacy, Domestic Politics, and the U.S.–India Nuclear Agreement, „Asian Survey” 2006, vol. 46, nr 5, s. 675–698.
  • Mowle T.S., Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism, and External Conflict, „Political Psychology” 2003, vol. 24, nr 3, s. 561–592.
  • Naseem S.M., Globalisation, Technology, and Asian Economic Growth, „The Pakistan Development Review” 1999, vol. 37, nr 4, s. 635–659.
  • Navaneetham K., The Influence of Cohort Effects on Mortality Trends in India: Role of Economic Factors, „Population Research and Policy Review” 1993, vol. 12, nr 2, s. 159–176.
  • Osland G.E., Cavusgil, S.T. Performance Issues in U.S.–China Joint Ventures, „California Management Review” 1996, vol. 38, nr 2, s. 106–130.
  • Rak J., Aksjomatyczny charakter geopolityczności w dyskursie sejmowym. Analiza zjawiska predykatów konstruujących językowy obraz geopolityki na przykładzie stenogramów z posiedzeń Sejmu RP VII kadencji, „Pro Fide Rege et Lege” 2012, nr 1(70), s. 70–87.
  • Ramaswamy S., Maps and Mother Goddesses in Modern India, „Imago Mundi” 2001, vol. 53, s. 97–114.
  • Rolfe J., Regional Security for the Asia-Pacific: Ends and Means, „Contemporary Southeast Asia” 2008, vol. 30, nr 1, s. 99–117.
  • Rosel J., The European Union: A Model for Regional Co-operation in South Asia?, „Economic and Political Weekly” 1996, vol. 31, nr 49, s. 3169–3173.
  • Schmidt G., Asia, Europe, North America, and the „Asian Capitalist Miracle”. Changing „Power Cycles” and Evolving Roles in Regional and International Structures, „International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique” 2003, vol. 24, nr 1, s. 67–81.
  • Sharma S., India in 2010, „Asian Survey” 2011, vol. 51, nr 1, s. 111–124.
  • Shekhovtsov A., Umland A., Is Aleksandr Dugin a Traditionalist? „Neo-Eurasianism” and Perennial Philosophy, „Russian Review” 2009, vol. 68, nr 4, s. 662–678.
  • Shlapentokh d., Dugin Eurasianism: A Window on the Minds of the Russian Elite or an Intellectual Ploy?, „Studies in East European Thought” 2007, vol. 59, nr 3, s. 215–236.
  • Spreitzer G.M. Hopkins Perttula K., Xin K., Traditionality Matters: An Examination of the Effectiveness of Transformational Leadership in the United States and Taiwan, Journal of Organizational Behavior 2005, vol. 26, nr 3, s. 205–227.
  • Szumowski A., Definicje siły w azjatyckich szkołach stosunków międzynarodowych, [w:] W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, red. J. Marszałek-Kawa, Toruń 2012, s. 194-195, 234.
  • Togan S., Opening up the Turkish Economy in the Context of the Customs Union with EU, „Journal of Economic Integration” 1997, vol. 12, nr 2, s. 157–179.
  • Twomey Ch.P., Missing Strategic Opportunity in U.S. China Policy since 9/11: Grasping Tactical Success, „Asian Survey” 2007, vol. 47, nr 4, s. 536–559.
  • Wawrzyński p., Wiek Azji? Mityczny Początek a wzrost znaczenia państw azjatyckich w XXI wieku, [w:] W kierunku azjatyckiego przywództwa, red. J. Marszałek-Kawa, Toruń 2012. s. 48, 49.
  • Wu G., China in 2010, „Asian Survey” 2011, vol. 51, nr 1, s. 18–32.
  • Xu X.E., Performance of Securities Investment Funds in China, „Emerging Markets Finance & Trade” 2005, vol. 41, nr 5, s. 27–42.
  • Yeşilada B., Efird B., Noordijk P., Competition among Giants: A Look at How Future Enlargement of the European Union Could Affect Global Power Transition, „International Studies Review” 2006, vol. 8, nr 4, s. 607–622.
  • Yuki M., Intergroup Comparison versus Intragroup Relationships. A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social Identity Theory in North American and East Asian Cultural Contexts, „Social Psychology Quarterly” 2003, vol. 66, nr 2, s. 166–183.
  • Zhang B., The Security Dilemma in the U.S.–China Military Space Relationship, „Asian Survey” 2011, vol. 51, nr 2, s. 311–332.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.