PL EN


2019 | 53 | 1 |
Article title

Activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Theoretical background: The article discusses the activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development (SD). This is a specific development, which considers the needs of future generations. These activities may concern environmental, social or economic issues. The identified knowledge gap refers to the type of the most common SD-activities, possible partners in such projects, employee involvement and motivation to participate in such activities, and the perceived advantages and negative aspects of SD-projects.Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to evaluate the activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development. The described issues include: the type of the most common SD-activities, possible partners in such projects, employee involvement and motivation to participate in such activities, and the perceived advantages and negative aspects of SD-projects.Research methods: The empirical material was obtained from 13 individual in-depth interviews conducted by telephone in 2018.Main findings: The analysed organizations implemented mainly social, but also ecological projects. By the implementation of projects, they cooperated mainly with NGO-partners, but only if it was necessary (e.g. if the NGO had more knowledge and experience in a specific field). Most of the projects were based on the active participation of employees in the form of volunteering; such projects had the most positive effects for the project’s goals, but also for the employees and the company. Hence, companies willingly motivated employees to participate in such projects not only by informational and organizational support, but also through various methods of distinguishing employees (e.g. volunteering gala, cup of coffee with the CEO). Companies see considerable benefits in such projects for themselves and for the staff. The perceived disadvantages are few, and in any case they can be minimized and are fully discounted by the potential benefits.
Year
Volume
53
Issue
1
Physical description
Dates
published
2019
online
2019-10-14
Contributors
author
References
  • Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf [access: 04.04.2017].
  • Carter, C.R., & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving towards new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816.
  • Cirnu, C.E., & Kuralt B. (2013). The impact of employees’ personal values on their attitudes toward sustainable development: cases of Slovenia and Romania. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 18(2).
  • Florida, R. (1996). Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. California Management Review, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/41165877.
  • Galpin, T., Whittington, J.L., Bell G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2013-0004.
  • Godkin, L. (2015). Mid-Management, Employee Engagement, and the Generation of Reliable Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2149-0.
  • Ji, L., Huang, J., Liuc, Z., Zhua, H., Caia, Z. (2012). The effects of employee training on the relationship between environmental attitude and firms’ performance in sustainable development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(14). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.637072.
  • Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.002.
  • Liu, Z., Li J., Zhu, H., Cai, Z., & Wang, l. (2014). Chinese fims’ sustainable development – the role of future orientation, environmental commitment, and employee training. Asia Pacifi Journal of Management, 31. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-012-9291-y
  • Polman, P., & Bhattacharya, C. (2016). Engaging Employees to Create a Sustainable Business. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall.
  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
  • Szołtysek, J. (2009). Logistyka zwrotna. Poznań: Instytut logistyki i Magazynowania.
  • Temminck, E., Mearns, K., Fruhen, L. (2015). Motivating Employees towards Sustainable Behaviour. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1827.
  • Verhulst, E., & Boks, C. (2014). Employee Empowerment for Sustainable Design. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 55. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.se.00008.
  • Wolf, J. (2013). Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1731.
  • Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_h_2019_53_1_99-109
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.