Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  GROUP IDENTITY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

IDENTIFICATION WITH LARGE SCALE SOCIAL CATEGORIES: A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVE

100%
Lasticova B.
Sociológia (Sociology)
|
2006
|
vol. 38
|
issue 6
546-561
EN
This paper reviews social psychology approach to the study of the group identities based on social identity and the self-categorization theories. These are discussed with respect to multiple category memberships and identification with the large scale social categories such as nation and Europe. The assumption about hierarchical relations between the nested categories is criticised and it is argued that the perceptualist approach to social categorization should be combined with the approaches taking into account the role of language and discourse in the processes of identification. Finally, some methodological implications are outlined.
2

On the group identity of the Jewish youth in Debrecen in the light of Jewish ethnicity

100%
Jona G.
Szociologiai Szemle (Sociological Review)
|
2005
|
vol. 15
|
issue 4
56-67
EN
This article examines the new, alternative assimilation strategies among the Hungarian Jewish ethnicity after the decade following World War II. As a hypothesis, the author assumes that the Jewish form their integration (formerly assimilation) strategy according to the substantial elements of the internal, latent structures of their identity (Taylor 1996). The study describes the realization of this new identity frame emerging after the regime change among the Jewish Youth living in Debrecen, and concludes that the existence of the frame of this ethnical identity is obviously recognizable and should the current tendencies not change, such new identity concept would gain even more extent in the areas of their beliefs and concepts. The Jewish Youth living in Debrecen is forthright and proud of their ethnical identity, which is in contrast with the reactive identity concept of their ancestors.
3
Content available remote

GLOBALISATION VERSUS GROUP IDENTITY. BETWEEN THE TEXT AND RESEARCH PRACTICE (Globalizacja a tozsamosc zbiorowa. Pomiedzy tekstem a praktyka badawcza)

100%
Chwieduk A.
Lud
|
2010
|
vol. 94
73-86
EN
The article discusses the contradictions between the general scientific reflection on globalisation present in social sciences and the attempts of the anthropologist who tries to interpret the phenomenon of globalisation and its social and cultural consequences in a specific local space. Two opposing scientific discourses appear against this background - one is theoretical, rather poorly rooted in empirical research and focused on the attempt to capture universal features of globalisation, detached from a specific place and time, and the other, more anthropological, primarily focused on the phenomenon of glocalisation, which is engaged in field research. Our understanding of the globalisation/glocalisation processes depends on how these phenomena are conceptualised and on the adequate research method chosen.The author discusses the character of relations linking globalisation to the identity building processes and makes references to the concepts of such researchers as Roland Robertson, Ajrun Appadurai, Ulf Hannerz, Manuel Castells, James Clifford, and Zygmunt Bauman. She shows examples of the empirical research of globalisation processes, presented in Polish anthropological texts. The author emphasises the need to conduct profound studies aimed at capturing the sense that local communities associate with the globalisation impacts, thus reorganising their particular world and reconstructing their identity.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problemy wartościowania w języku i w tekście

88%
Puzynina J.
Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury
|
2004
|
vol. 16
179-190
PL
Autorka stawia pytanie o to, jak się przejawia wartościowanie w systemie językowym i w tekście. Twierdzi, że wartościowanie zawsze dokonuje się w wypowiedziach, czyli tworzonych tekstach. Podmiotami wartościowań tekstowych są autorzy konkretnych tekstów, podmiotami skonwencjonalizowanych wartościowań kodowych – mniejsze lub większe społeczności. Przedmiotem wartościowania jest cała otaczająca rzeczywistość oraz możliwe światy, pojawiające się w świadomości człowieka, człowiek bowiem wartościuje samego siebie, swoje możliwości, przymioty, poczynania. Podstawą sądów wartościujących są zdania z kwantyfikatorem ogólnym (typu X jest czymś cennym/złym), nazywane zasadami wartości. W akcie komunikacji jednostka może dokonywać połączenia norm należących do różnych systemów wartości, może też zapożyczać zasady od indywidualnych autorytetów, może tworzyć własne. W tekstach obecne są: (a) wartościowania podmiotu mówiącego (autora tekstu), w poezji – też podmiotu lirycznego, w prozie narracyjnej – narratora, (b) wartościowania bohaterów literackich oraz (c) wartościowania relacjonowane w mowie niezależnej lub zależnej. Wartościowania tekstowe pojawiają się w różnych aktach mowy, w różnych modalnościach. Często w tekstach dochodzi do wartościowań ukrytych w presupozycjach. Wartościowaniu służą różne jednostki kodu językowego: wyrazy (dobry, zły; ładny, brzydki; ojczyzna, matka), związki frazeologiczne (coś jest do kitu, coś jest wysokiej klasy), konstrukcje słowotwórcze (romansidło, artykulisko), formy fleksyjne (ministry, profesory), konstrukcje składniowe (dzięki komuś; kosztem kogoś/czegoś) i środki fonologiczne (np. intonacja). Wartościowania występują w tekstach o różnych funkcjach. Są ważnym elementem identyfikacji grupowej.
EN
The article deals with the problem of the linguistic and textual manifestations of valuation. A claim is made that it is always realized in utterances, i.e. texts. The subjects of textual valuations are the authors of the texts, whereas the subjects of conventionalized coded valuations are communities of different sizes. The object of valuation is the whole reality and possible worlds arising in people's consciousness. People tend to valuate themselves, their own abilities, traits and actions. The basis for valuating judgments are sentences, treated as the principles of values, which include the general quantifier (of the type 'X is something valuable/bad'). In the communicative act, the speaker/hearer can combine norms from different systems of values, borrow principles from individual authorities or create one's own. In texts, one finds the presence of: a) value judgments coming from the speaking subject (the author of the text), in poetry - of the lyrical 'I', in narrative prose – of the narrator; b) judgments from the protagonists and other literary frgures, c) judgments expressed in direct or indirect speech. Textual valuation appears in various speech acts and modalities. Valuation often takes place in hidden presuppositions. It can be achieved through various units of the linguistic code: words: 'dobry' (good), 'zly' (bad), 'ladny' (nice), 'brzydki' (ugly), 'ojczyzna' (homeland); phraseological units: 'cos jest do kitu' (sth is worth nothing), 'cos jest wysokiej klasy' (sth is of high class); word-formational constructions: 'romansidlo' (mawkish love story), 'artykulisko' (a huge article); inflectional forms 'ministry' (ministers), 'profesory' (professors); syntactic constructions: 'dzieki komus' (thanks to sb), 'kosztem kogos/czegos' (at the expense of sb/sth) and phonological features (e.g. intonation). Valuation occurs in texts with various functions; it constitutes an important aspect of group identity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.