Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Human being
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This work analyzes the relationship between Bioethics and Ecology, while taking into account social interactions. Therefore, it focuses on the origin and evolution of the bioethics concept; on the several elements of Integral Ecology; on the close relationship between Bioethics and the Environment; as well as on the relevance of Environmental Education for the future of our planet.
EN
This paper examines four issues concerning human being as a multi-dimensional be-ing. Firstly, the dualist and tripartite conceptions of human beings are discussed. The dichotomist (dualist, bipartite) view of human beings—according to which man com-prises of spiritual soul and body—underscores in a strongly materialistic world the idea that faith, spirituality, belief, trust and confidence are soft options in daily life. Second-ly, the author investigates the possibility of a differentiation and interchange of human fields of experience as components of human nature. In the African and Christian ap-proaches taken into account in this paper, human being comprises a differentiated mul-tiplicity of fields, components, dimensions and facets of experience integrated into a wholesome creature that experiences God, itself, other human beings and the natural environment. Each component of human being, though radically different, is of the same importance. Thirdly, the modern integral and differential conceptions of human being as a multi-dimensional entity are discussed. The approach in this paper is of postmodern non-reductionist type; according to it, human beings are comprised differ-entially of a multiplicity of fields, modes, dimensions and aspects of experience dynam-ically integrated in a union.
PL
The article aims to show the main aspects of Michel de Montaigne’s philosophy of man, exposing the existential themes presented in it. The paper presents Montaigne’s critique of speculative (academic) philosophy, his reluctance to construct a philosophical system, to describe and explain human life experience as a whole. The article emphasizes that the French philosopher appears as a defender of religious tolerance, a spokesman of dialogue and cultural relativism, and also – considering the existential themes of his work (the problem of loneliness, moral values or art of living) – that he may be considered a pioneer of existential philosophy.
EN
The purpose of this article is to propose a synthesis of Jacques Poulain's philosophical reflection on language and its importance for human being and for the society. To do this, we begin with presenting what Poulain has constantly established in the light of anthropobiological knowledge in his various works by showing that the child does not directly enter the world through senses or action, but through language and that it cannot enter the world and become a subject able to think and act in isolation, but necessarily through the intermediary of a Third of speech. The same goes for the author at the institutional level, since man, as a being of language, has only been able to transform himself indirectly, through the intermediary of this Third of speech, which first took the form of the gods, then by making the detour of the judgment. Today, as Poulain argues in polemic with Jürgen Habermas, there can be no other basis for global communication than transcultural linguistic understanding, ie. language constitutes the space where man can be recognized, exercise judgment and strive for harmony with others.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie syntezy myśli filozoficznej Jacquesa Poulaina dotyczącej języka, jego znaczenia dla człowieka i dla społeczeństwa. W pierwszym kroku przybliżona zostaje zaczerpnięta z wiedzy antropobiologicznej myśl zawarta w wielu pracach Poulaina, zgodnie z którą dziecko nie jest w stanie wejść w świat bezpośrednio za pomocą zmysłów i działań, lecz za pośrednictwem języka, nie jest też w stanie wejść w świat i stać się zdolnym do samodzielnego myślenia i działania podmiotem inaczej niż za sprawą trzeciej instancji, jaką jest mowa. Zdaniem autora odnosi się to także do wymiaru społeczno-instytucjonalnego, bowiem wedle ustaleń dwudziestowiecznej antropologii filozoficznej człowiek jako istota językowa może siebie przekształcać jedynie nie wprost, dzięki pośredniczącej roli trzeciej instancji – mowy, która najpierw przybierała postać bogów, by z czasem przyjąć formę sądów prawdziwościowych dotyczących własnego życia. Współcześnie, jak twierdzi Poulain w polemice z Habermasem, podstawą globalnej komunikacji może być jedynie transkulturowa językowa wymiana – to język pozostaje przestrzenią, w której człowiek może znajdować uznanie, dokonywać sądów i dążyć do harmonii z innymi.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.