Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The purpose of this study was to examine the connection between two different implicit measures of attitudes towards others. In base on previous studies on prejudices and national stereotypes, also with use of these techniques, Jews were chosen as target group. Two techniques were used. The first of them was the graphic, questionnaire technique to assess asymmetry in the self-other distance rating. Stereotypical perception of Jews was indicated by Judocentric asymmetry effect, which was reversed in relation to typical egocentric asymmetry effect. The second technique was Polish version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), a method using reaction time as an indicator of automatic processes, which is widely applied to measure implicit attitudes. The stronger IAT effect the more stereotypic perception of Jews. Forty-seven psychology students participated in described study. The obtained results indicate that there is a significant correlation between these two techniques: the higher Judocentric asymmetry effect the stronger IAT effect.
Studia Psychologica
|
2020
|
vol. 62
|
issue 1
58 – 73
EN
Studies have found that shame and aggression are closely connected, and self-blaming and re-planning strategies can regulate an individual’s shame. This study conducted two experiments to investigate the effects of self-regulation of shame on explicit and implicit aggressiveness of adolescents. Shame was induced in both experiments by audio recordings describing different shameful situations that adolescents may experience in daily life. The participants of 7th grade were required to self-regulate their shame by self-blaming strategy, re-planning strategy, or non-regulation, and rated their explicit aggressiveness in Study 1 and did implicit association test (IAT) in Study 2, respectively. The current studies found that the regulation of shame with self-blaming strategy enhanced explicit aggression, but did not affect the bias of implicit aggression.
EN
This paper proposes a new method of idiographic measurement for dynamic assessment (DA) intervention. There are two main methods of measurement for DA intervention; split–half tests and integrated scoring systems. Split-half tests of ability have proved useful from a research perspective. Integrated scoring systems coupled with case studies are useful from a practitioner perspective. The purpose of this research is to bridge the gap between research and practice by developing a methodology that is compatible with both. To this end the paper proposes a measureable idiographic method of measurement, which utilises multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and general procrustean analysis (GPA) to analyse the result of card-sort data gathered from a learner across the entire intervention. This approach provides a method of assessment, which is both compatible with individual intervention and suited to building a body of evidence-based research for DA. An example of the method in practice is given for illustrative purposes. The initial results suggest that this approach provides a methodology that satisfies the requirements of both practitioners when formulating targeted intervention and researchers who require methods of measurement of change in ability of the individual over time.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.