Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  NAGORNO-KARABAKH
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
A conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the area of Nagorno-Karabakh seems to be 'one-way traffic' reaching no agreement. In fact, there is no chance of making a long-lasting breakthrough in the negotiations which means that the dispute will continue to destabilize South Caucasus for a long time. Despite the importance of the argument, there are no comments on it in the media or any academic publications. The issue of Nagorno-Karabakh has long since been treated instrumentally and used to accelerate feuds between the countries in Caucasus. The conflict of interests of so many players in the region of South Caucasus results in that the actual situation in the region - an originally ethnic conflict - became an element of geopolitical and economic game between Russia and the West (which, instead of hampering the escalation of the conflict, become its catalysts). The present article aims at analyzing the actual conflict in the most exhaustive way that is possible - from its origin, through the armed phase, up to the present situation in the region; with a special emphasis placed on the proposals to solve the dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh discussed from the point of view of interests of the countries directly or indirectly involved in the conflict. The article ends with an attempt to predict the future development of the situation in the region and to answer a question whether the parties will manage to break the impasse or the situation will remain stalemate.
EN
The territory of Nagorno-Karabakh had become the matter of Armenian-Azerbaijani disputes long before the establishment of the Soviet power in the Caucasus. The colonization of Armenian citizens at the Muslim territories had been rising after every conflict which the Russian Empire was involved in. Especially after the Crimean War and Russian War which took place between 1876-1878. After the conflicts which took place between 1905-1907 and 1918-1920 Karabakh became a part of Armenian national myth. The establishment of the Soviet power in November 1920 resulted in recognition of Karabakh as a part of one Republic. The fact that during the times of the Soviet Union the conflict didn't exist can be only related to the military state. The begining of the current phase took place in 1987 the Armeni Supreme Council's decision from 10th January 1990 about covering the Nagorno-Karabakh in the budget and granting the citizens the right to vote in general elections was another step leading to escalation of the conflict. The authorities in Baku maintain that the essential condition is the principal of territorial integrity. It says that the resolution which would assume the integration of Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh to be the only one and proper. On the other hand the Armenians relate to the law of nations, and aspire to self-determination. According to them the declaration of independence became effective. The dispute is still one of the key problems destabilizing the situation in the furthest part of the Caucasus.
3
Content available remote

Zahraniční politika Arménie v letech 1991–2004

63%
EN
This article analyses evolution of the post-Soviet Armenian foreign policy during the first fourteen years of Armenia's existence as an independent state. The introductory section briefly analyses key regional factors into which the Armenian diplomacy developed - with an emphasis on the historical context connected with unsettled relations with Turkey, the most significant neighbour, and Russia and with respect to the internal development of this small south Caucasian country. Important factors of Armenian foreign policy regarding Nagorno-Karabakh and its neighbour Azerbaijan are analysed together with the (non)recognition of the Armenian genocide and its significance to the relations between Yerevan and Ankara but also Armenia-Russia and Armenia-Iran.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.