Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  NATIONAL PHILOSOPHY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2016
|
vol. 71
|
issue 10
881 – 891
EN
The article deals with the researches in recent history of Slovak philosophy as they were accomplished by the Department of philosophy and the history of philosophy (Philosophical faculty, Comenius University) in 1940-1980. Among the main issues belong: system of teaching philosophy and making the public familiar with philosophy; Bratislava Philosophical School, patterns and transformations of Slovak philosophy in the 20th century etc.
EN
Wincenty Lutoslawski, the Polish philosopher of the turn of the 19th century, friend of Roman Dmowski and Zygmunt Balicki, as well as a member of the National League, was associated by many of his contemporaries with the National-Democratic option. Yet even a cursory analysis of Lutoslawski's academic writings indicates his Romantic provenience and fascination with Romantic national thought. The article attempts to grasp both major similarities and differences between his approach and the reflection of his intellectual predecessors. The authoress suggests that Lutoslawski's approach is not just imitative, but constitutes an attempt (perhaps the last one) to advance a Romantic idea of the commonwealth of nations. Lutoslawski differs from the Romantics in his approach to definitions of the nation. To understand the nation in political categories is, for him, a serious mistake. The nation-state, being merely a form of political creation, should not be confused with the nation. His definition of the nation relates to a cultural model of Polish national reflection in which the most crucial role is played by national consciousness. In a tradition lasting many centuries, the supreme mission of the Polish nation has been in attracting its neighbors and establishing close ties with Poland by them. This mission should be continued in the future in order to transform peoples into 'true' nations. The basic principle for such ties was a guarantee of equality for all and the freedom to maintain the language and customs of individual tribes. Lutoslawski believes that national philosophy is a universal phenomenon and should not be confined to the one nation which is developing it. This line of thought should enable each nation to contribute to the development of universal philosophy and also the progress of all humanity. Lutoslawski's life mission was to promote the immense Polish contribution to the heritage of the thought of man.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2015
|
vol. 70
|
issue 10
865 – 872
EN
The article underlines the importance of the study of the school philosophy in the 19th century Hungary. The school philosophy is conceived not only as a part of educational system, but also as the existential basis in the making of national philosophies in Hungary, especially the Hungarian and Slovak ones. Also two different approaches are discussed to making and development of Slovak and Hungarian philosophies as formulated by O. Mészáros and V. Bakoš.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 1
1 – 12
EN
The presented study makes a brief summary of the history of historiography of the Hungarian philosophy from the first half of the 19th century up to present days. Afterwards it deals with main tendencies of the contemporary historiography. It introduces the main results of innovations in this field as follows: the refusal of the standard narrative in the Hungarian philosophy, the reconstruction of forming canons, the reinterpretation of the function of the so called national philosophy as well as places of Erdélyi and Szontagh in it and the revelation of specific features of the so called school philosophy.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2016
|
vol. 71
|
issue 10
845 – 857
EN
The article sheds light on the reception of Hegel’s philosophy in Hungarian and Slovak philosophical thought of the 19th century. It tries to answer the question: Why the canonizations of Hegel in these two philosophical milieus differ? The canonization itself is rendered as a process and result of controversial coaction of subversive doings of the respective national subjects as well as the protecting interventions of political power. Two arguments, which have as yet been omitted, are offered in support of this thesis: (1) reception of Hegel in the Monarchy, i.e. also in Hungary, has been in the 19th century strongly determined by the established cultural and teaching politics, which (especially in the second half of the 19th century) preferred Herbart’s philosophy rejecting at the same time Hegel’s ideas. (2) Hegel’s system became in Hungarian as well as in Slovak philosophy closely connected with the respective conceptions of national philosophy. It was the character of these national philosophies that influenced the reception of other ideas including those of Hegel.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2014
|
vol. 69
|
issue 9
725 – 736
EN
The article is a contribution to the discussion about the methodology of the historiography of so-called “national philosophy”. The author´s thesis is that the history of national philosophies (especially those of the 19th century) should be seen in the context of the Monarchy, while abandoning the conceptual apparatus of the traditional positivist comparative approach. This material serves to show the way the concepts like centre/periphery, subaltern position, subversion, containment, canon, pretext/post-text, transformation and imitation are being used today. In conclusion, different developments in Austrian, Czech, Hungarian, Slovak and Polish philosophies of 19th century come to the foreground.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.