Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Ukrainian emigration
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

FOR THE ANNIVERSARY OF PhD IN HISTORY, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, A MEMBER OF OUR YEARBOOK EDITORIAL BOARD ĽUBICA HARBUĽOVÁ

100%
Švorc P.
Міжнародні зв’язки України: наукові пошуки і знахідки
|
2022
|
issue 31
326-330
EN
The article covers the biography and scholarly activities of PhD in History, Associate Professor, a member of our yearbook editorial board Ľubica Harbuľová
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pisarz poza ojczyzną: sylwetka Jurija Szewelowa

100%
Stefanowska L.
Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia
|
2017
|
vol. 5
262-277
PL
In the second half of the 1940s, Ukrainian literature outside of Soviet Ukraine experienced an unusually intensive period of development in the Displaced Person’s camps in western Germany and Austria. Thrown together from various regions of Ukraine, writers managed to develop an amazing literary activity. A key role in this period was played by one of the most important Ukrainian émigré scholar, literary critic and essayist – Yuryii Shevelov (born on 17 December 1908 in Kharkiv, died 12 April 2002 in New York.) Having emigrated to Germany in 1944, he taught at the Ukrainian Free University in Münich (1946–9) and obtained a doctorate there (1949). He was also a vice-president of the MUR literary association (1945–8) and edited a monthly journal Arka. Shevelov is the author of some 500 articles, reviews, and books on Slavic philology and linguistics and the history of literature. He was one of the organizers of émigré literary life in Germany after the Second World War. In the postwar period Yurii Shevelov (pseud: Yu. Sherekh) has been the most infl uential literary critic within the Ukrainian émigré community in the West. In his articles in the journal Arka (1947–8) he formulated the principles of a ‘national-organic style’ and stimulated a lively discussion that continued for some time. Another émigré critic, Volodymyr Derzhavyn, produced articles that combined the Neoclassicist and modernist approaches. They both began a discussion that contributed to a revival of postwar Ukrainian literature. The principal intellectual discord between them was an understanding of what “national” means and what kind of tradition should serve as a “source of revival” for Ukrainian culture in exile. His numerous articles in the fi eld of literature and literary criticism were collected in Ne dlia ditei (Not for Children, 1964), Druha cherha: literatura, teatr, ideolohiï (The Second Round: Literature, Theater, Ideologies, 1978), and Tretia storozha (The Third Watch, 1991). Most of these essays were reprinted in Kharkiv in 1998 in a two-volume edition Porohy i zaporizhzhia (The Rapids and zaporizhzhia).
3
Content available remote

"Kde je síla, tam je i svoboda!" Ukrajinské sokolské hnutí v meziválečném Československu

100%
Lozoviuk P.
Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)
|
2023
|
vol. 109
|
issue 2
243-265
EN
The Ukrainian Sokol movement abroad is an interesting social phenomenon from the point of view of studying the formation of the modern Ukrainian nation. In addition to the cultivation of physical fitness, education for active patriotism occupied an important place in the Sokol ideology. The study traces the process of the development of a specific analogy of the Sokol movement in the conditions of the still forming Ukrainian nation in a historical perspective. The emphasis is placed on its institutionalisation in the conditions of the ethnic diaspora. The main source of information for such a focused study was the contemporary emigrant press and other publications published in the diaspora. The most comprehensive reports on the issues discussed can be found in the monthly Ukrainian Sokol, whose publisher was the Union of Ukrainian Sokol Abroad, the organisation that receives the most attention in the text. In addition to the formation of national consciousness, the role of Ukrainian Sokol lay in the consolidation of disparate Ukrainian currents of opinion in an environment of politically disunited emigration. The author concludes that the Sokol movement played a significant role in shaping the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism on the territory of the Czech lands during the period under study.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Senyk’s Archive and its significance for studies on the behind-the-scenes picture of the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists. New research perspectives in the light of discovered correspondence

63%
Gibiec M.
Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
|
2019
|
vol. 54
|
issue 3
109-126
PL
Zabójstwo ministra spraw wewnętrznych Bronisława Pierackiego w 1934 roku, jako najpoważniejsza akcja przeprowadzona przez Organizację Ukraińskich Nacjonalistów w latach międzywojennych, było pochodną napiętych relacji polsko-ukraińskich. Tzw. archiwum Senyka, znalezione przez wywiad czechosłowacki w 1933 roku i przekazane polskim władzom, zostało ujawnione zbyt późno, aby zapobiec tragedii, jednak stało się podstawą do sformułowania aktu oskarżenia przeciwko Stepanowi Banderze oraz innym członkom OUN zaangażowanym w terrorystyczną działalność wobec II Rzeczypospolitej. Archiwum składa się z około 700 listów wymienianych pomiędzy członkami Zarządu OUN na emigracji w pierwszej połowie lat 30. XX wieku. Autorka niniejszego artykułu odnalazła je w Centralnym Państwowych Archiwum Historycznym Ukrainy we Lwowie. 
EN
The assassination of Bronisław Pieracki, Polish Minister of Interior, which took place in 1934, was the most significant operation carried out by the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists during the interwar period, and was a consequence of tense Polish-Ukrainian relations. The so-called Senyk’s Archive, discovered by Czechoslovakian intelligence in 1933 and handed over to the Polish authorities, was disclosed too late to prevent the tragedy, yet it became grounds for the formulation of an indictment against Stepan Bandera and other OUN members involved in terrorist activities against the Second Polish Republic. The archive consists of about 700 letters exchanged by the members of the OUN Board in exile during the first half of the 1930s. The author of the present article discovered them in the Central State Historical Archive of Ukraine in Lviv.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Aktywność nacjonalistów ukraińskich na Bałkanach w latach 1929-1933. Wokół raportu z podróży inspekcyjnej Jarosława Baranowśkiego

51%
Gibiec M.
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
|
2022
|
vol. 39
|
issue 1
160-177
PL
W 1929 r. nastąpiło połączenie ugrupowań ukraińskich o profilu skrajnie nacjonalistycznym w Organizację Ukraińskich Nacjonalistów (OUN) pod kierownictwem dotychczasowego przywódcy Ukraińskiej Organizacji Wojskowej (UWO) Jewhena Konowalca1. Jedną z głównych przyczyn zjednoczenia było wyczerpanie dotychczasowej formuły i zmiana profilu działalności nacjonalistów. Aktywność UWO, nastawiona w znacznej mierze na prowadzenie akcji terrorystycznych i przygotowania do zbrojnego powstania, częściowo ustąpiła miejsca strategicznej realizacji celów politycznych i szukania poparcia na arenie międzynarodowej2. Jednym z efektów tej decyzji był dynamiczny rozwój ośrodków emigracyjnych oraz powiązanych z nimi pozornie niezależnych instytucji skupiających diasporę ukraińską.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.