Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  aggressor
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper discusses the analysis of respondents’ opinions on the issue of mobbing. The authors were interested in the respondents’ personal attitudes and experience thereof. Readers can find enclosed the results of the survey conducted on the discussed issue.
EN
This contribution of a theoretical-investigative character deals with bullying in the school environment, understood by us as a pedagogic, psychological, and legal phenomenon. At the same time it is a problem which is presently necessary for society to be specifically determined, defined, urgently solved, and it becomes a subject of increased interest of both the professional and lay public due to its seriousness. In our research we focused on how an aggressor and his/her specific manifestations are perceived by his/her homeroom teacher. We have found out that homeroom teachers perceive manifestations of aggressive behaviour differently; they consider them to be risky and rank them into multiple categories of a pupil’s risky behaviour. And on the contrary, there are teachers that do not consider an aggressor’s behaviour to be risky according to any of the categories of a pupil’s risky behaviour. We have noted more significant differences in homeroom teachers’ perception of a boy or a girl as an aggressor.
EN
The article focuses on conditions of undertaking an active role in interpersonal contacts in early adolescence. The experiment was situated in a context of social learning, which is why a way of functioning in social relationships was treated as an effect of an interaction of biopsychosocial factors. The conditions in which a role of a perpetrator was evoked were looked for in a mutual relation of factors such as: attachment, aggressiveness, psychological defense, and experienced emotions. An experimental group consisted of 399 adolescents aged between 12 and 15 years old. The experiment was longitudinal and two measurements were taken. The first one was taken at the beginning of a school year (September, 2015) and the second one was taken at the end of it (June, 2016). In the experiment, the following scales were used: BPAQ (Buss, Perry, 1992), CD – RISC (Connor, Davidson, 2003), IPPA (Armsden, Greenberg, 1987), SUPSO (Mikšik, 2004) and Mini-DIA (Österman, Björkqvist, 2008). Results obtained suggest an importance of earlier experiences of aggressiveness and experienced emotional states for an activation of aggressive behaviors. Among girls, an important protective factor was psychological defense. Among boys, attachment was crucial. The experiment’s results should make us reflect on an offer of prevention and correction programs for adolescents revealing aggressive behaviors.
EN
The study maps cyber-aggressors in elementary and secondary schools, with regard to an analysis of cyber-bullying forms. The aim of the presented empirical research was to identify pupils in the research sample who had committed repeated aggressive behaviour towards another person via the Internet, as well as to find out significant differences in individual cyber-bullying forms by gender and attended school forms. The research sample consisted of 390 pupils of elementary schools and 541 pupils of secondary schools. Empirical data were collected with the use of the questionnaire method. 96 cyber-aggressors were identified in the research sample. They were pupils who ticked one or more statements relating to cyber-bullying forms, admitting that they had repeatedly used them. It was found out that the most frequent cyber-bullying form was insults, threats and name-calling in online communication, thus the so-called flaming
EN
The theoretical part of the paper describes the problems of new media, bullying and its modified form - cyberbullying, place, time and characteristics of the protagonists of traditional bullying and cyberbullying, including a comparison of traditional bullying and cyberbullying, according to criteria that are specifically defined. The second part informs about the results of research of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among university students provided by Ostrava´s questionnaire of cyberbullying. The conclusion of the work points out that most of university students are more likely to interfere with traditional bullying than cyberbullying. With traditional bullying met 466 students (45.2 %) compared to 205 students (19.9 %), who clashed with cyberbullying. The preferred defense against cyberbullying strategies are: to confide in parents, to block access to footage of cyberbullying on the Internet, to tell a friend outside the school and the school report cyberbullying.
EN
The article presents results of a survey on peer aggression conducted in February 2020. The survey was carried out on a group of students and teachers from two primary schools and a secondary school. The most common aggression types turned out to be relational, verbal and psychological. Almost 50 per cent of students from the examined primary schools declared experiencing aggression sometimes or often and assessed it as upsetting or unbearable, the one-fifth of students admitted to being bullied. Girls perceived agression as more upsetting than boys did. Boys were more likely to fall victim to verbal and psychological aggression, girls – to relational aggression. Almost half of aggressors were not able to, or refused to explain reasons for their behaviour. More than a quarter of surveyed students acted aggressively in reaction to peers’ behaviour, trying to get even. Girls more frequently than boys tended to explain their aggression referring to their emotions, boys – were apt to justify aggression viewing it as jokes and justified humorousness. The main source of teachers’ knowledge of hostile behaviours among students was information provided directly by pupils and their parents. Teachers claimed not to notice any forms of material, physical and intimate aggression in their classes.
PL
Artykuł prezentuje wyniki prowadzonych w lutym 2020 roku badań ankietowych poświęconych agresji rówieśniczej. Badania przeprowadzono na grupie uczniów i nauczycieli dwóch szkół podstawowych i liceum ogólnokształcącego. Najpowszechniejszymi rodzajami agresji okazała się agresja relacyjna, werbalna i psychiczna. Niemal połowa uczniów badanych szkół podstawowych doświadczała agresji czasami i często oraz określała ją jako przykrą i nie do zniesienia, jedna piąta była dręczona. Dziewczęta uważały agresję za bardziej dotkliwą niż chłopcy. Chłopcy częściej padali ofiarami agresji werbalnej i psychicznej, a dziewczęta relacyjnej. Prawie połowa sprawców nie potrafiła, bądź nie chciała, wyjaśnić przyczyn swojego zachowania. Ponad jedna czwarta była agresywna w reakcji na zachowanie rówieśnika, próbując mu odpłacić. Dziewczęta częściej niż chłopcy tłumaczyły się odczuwanymi emocjami, a chłopcy żartami i zabawą. Głównym źródłem wiedzy nauczycieli na temat wrogich zachowań wśród uczniów były informacje dostarczane bezpośrednio przez dzieci i ich rodziców. Nauczyciele nie dostrzegli w swoich klasach przejawów agresji materialnej, fizycznej i intymnej.
EN
The article focuses on conditions of undertaking an active role in interpersonal contacts in early adolescence. The experiment was situated in a context of social learning, which is why a way of functioning in social relationships was treated as an effect of an interaction of biopsychosocial factors. The conditions in which a role of a perpetrator was evoked were looked for in a mutual relation of factors such as: attachment, aggressiveness, psychological defense, and experienced emotions. An experimental group consisted of 399 adolescents aged between 12 and 15 years old. The experiment was longitudinal and two measurements were taken. The first one was taken at the beginning of a school year (September, 2015) and the second one was taken at the end of it (June, 2016). In the experiment, the following scales were used: BPAQ (Buss, Perry, 1992), CD – RISC (Connor, Davidson, 2003), IPPA (Armsden, Greenberg, 1987), SUPSO (Mikšik, 2004) and Mini-DIA (Österman, Björkqvist, 2008). Results obtained suggest an importance of earlier experiences of aggressiveness and experienced emotional states for an activation of aggressive behaviors. Among girls, an important protective factor was psychological defense. Among boys, attachment was crucial. The experiment’s results should make us reflect on an offer of prevention and correction programs for adolescents revealing aggressive behaviors.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy uwarunkowań podejmowania roli sprawcy w kontaktach interpersonalnych w okresie wczesnej adolescencji. Badania osadzono w koncepcji społecznego uczenia się, dlatego też sposób funkcjonowania w relacjach społecznych traktowano jako efekt interakcji czynników biopsychospołecznych. Uwarunkowań wzbudzania roli sprawcy poszukiwano we wzajemnych relacjach czynników, takich jak: przywiązanie, agresywność, odporność psychiczna i przeżywane emocje. Grupę badaną stanowiło 399 nastolatków w wieku między 12. a 15. rokiem życia. Badania miały charakter podłużny. Przeprowadzono dwa pomiary. Pierwszy na początku roku szkolnego (wrzesień 2015), a drugi na jego końcu (czerwiec 2016). W postępowaniu badawczym wykorzystano następujące kwestionariusze: BPAQ (Buss, Perry, 1992), CD – RISC (Connor, Davidson, 2003), IPPA (Armsden, Greenberg, 1987), SUPSO (Mikšik, 2004) oraz Mini-DIA (Österman, Björkqvist, 2008). Uzyskane rezultaty wskazują na znaczenie wcześniejszych doświadczeń, agresywności oraz przeżywanych stanów emocjonalnych dla aktywacji zachowań agresywnych. Wśród dziewcząt istotnym czynnikiem ochronnym okazała się odporność psychiczna. Natomiast w grupie chłopców wykazano znaczenie przywiązania. Wyniki badań skłaniają do refleksji nad budowaną ofertą programów profilaktycznych i korekcyjnych dla nastolatków przejawiających zachowania agresywne.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.