Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  bibliografoznawstwo
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

O problemie wieloznaczności terminu ‘bibliografia’ kolejny raz — o terminie ‘bibliografoznawstwo’ po raz pierwszy

100%
Łubocki J. M.
Roczniki Biblioteczne
|
2018
|
vol. 62
135-178
EN
Referring to the term “bibliography” and its ambiguity, the author proposes the introduction of a new term, “bibliografoznawstwo” into the Polish terminological system. The proposal is preceded by a description of a similar situation from the 1970s in the Soviet Union, where eventually the Russian term библиографоведение (and its equivalents — бібліографознавство in Ukrainian, and бібліяграфазнаўства in Belarusian) were fully accepted. Finally, the author challenges the theses concerning the existence of equivalents of the term in other languages (on the basis of a lexicographic analysis and data from Google Books Ngram Viewer). In conclusion he argues extensively in favour of the introduction of the new term “bibliografoznawstwo” as well as possible benefits of such a decision.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Google Books Ngram Viewer jako narzędzie weryfikacji istnienia ekwiwalentów obcego terminu (na przykładzie rosyjskiego terminu библиографоведение)

100%
Łubocki J. M.
Academic Journal of Modern Philology
|
2021
|
issue 13
191-201
EN
In the 1970s in the Soviet Union (by the standard: GOST 16448-70 Bibliografiâ. Terminy i opredeleniâ, Moskva 1971) the top-down term ‘библиографоведение’ was introduced to denote a scientific discipline that is part of the complex of bibliological disciplines, researching and developing issues of the theory, history and methodology of bibliographies as well as methodology, technology and organization of bibliographic activity. After the term became popular in the Soviet Union, there were suggestions in several sources in the years 1974–1999 that its equivalents also began to function in other languages – Polish, English, German, French. The analysis of data from Google Books Ngram Viewer, carried out for the other article (see: Jakub Maciej Łubocki, O problemie wieloznaczności terminu ‘bibliografia’ kolejny raz – o terminie ‘bibliografoznawstwo’ po raz pierwszy, „Roczniki Biblioteczne”, 2018 (R. 62), s. 135–178; doi.org/10.19195/0080-3626.62.9), allowed for a proper (mainly negative) assessment of these suggestions. This article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of conducting an analysis with the use of this tool. It also allows us to shed light on the problem of – sometimes too careless – equivalence of terms (and thus improper equivalence) and the possibility of its verification in the absence of data in the available dictionaries.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.