Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  canon 1101 § 1 CIC/1983
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 4
103-111
EN
The judgment (pro nullitate matrimonii) was issued in the third instance (it was negative in the first instance and positive in the second instance) due to the exclusion of marriage indissolubility by the woman, which was married to the man for 10 years; three children were born during the marriage. On the basis of testimonies of the parties and witnesses, as well as taking into consideration all circumstances, however, Roma Rota judges had no doubt that the petitioner excluded marriage indissolubility by her positive act of will, permeated with divorce ideas during her stay in Great Britain and persuaded to the marriage by her father (not in the meaning of can. 1103 CIC).
EN
The judgment (pro nullitate matrimonii) was issued in the third instance (it was negative in the first instance and positive in the second instance) due to the exclusion bonum prolis (can. 1101 § 1 CIC) by the man. On the basis of testimonies of the petitioner and witnesses, after taking into consideration all circumstances, especially cause of simulation which was pessimistic view of the world and all entire life, Roman Rota judges had no doubt that the petitioner excluded the good of offspring by his positive act of will.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.