Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  care allowance
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The right of farmer to care allowance in the jurisprudence of Polish courts The aim of this paper is to analyze important issue regarding right of farmers to care allowance as referred to in article 17 of the Law on family benefits of 28 November 2003. Recently have evolved two different position on this matter – one refusing farmers the rights to these benefits, and the second – giving them that power. In this paper the author briefly discusses both of this positions.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł poświęcony jest zagadnieniu uprawnień rolników do świadczenia pielęgnacyjnego, o którym mowa w ustawie z dnia 28 listopada 2003 r. o świadczeniach rodzinnych. Istotą tego zagadnienia jest spór, jaki zarysował się w ostatnim czasie między Naczelnym Sądem Administracyjnym, który w jednej ze swoich uchwał wyraził stanowisko o braku przesłanek uprawniających rolników do świadczeń pielęgnacyjnych, a Ministerstwem Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, prezentującym odmienny pogląd o spełnianiu przez rolników określonych kryteriów warunkujących ubieganie się o omawiane świadczenia.
EN
The text deals with the issue of the concurrence of care benefits and social security benefits regulated in the Act on Family Benefits. Such a situation occurs when a person who already has the right to a social insurance benefit, e.g. a retirement pension, acquires the right to one of the care benefits, e.g. an attendance benefit. The regulations included in the Act on Family Benefits are discussed against the background of the general principles according to which a particular type of risk can be protected with only one benefit and social insurance benefits take precedence over care benefits. According to the author’s opinion, the solutions adopted by the legislator are unadjusted to the current situation and are increasingly provoking controversy in practice and, consequently, in the author’s opinion, require changes. The lack of action on the part of the legislator causes courts to play its role, which should not occur in a properly functioning legal system based on the rule of the tripartite division of power.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.