Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  co-ordination
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
There are some typical relations that can be observed in public administration, including management, supervision, control, co-ordination and co-operation. The latter two are seldom subject to scrutiny by administration law academics. The purpose of this article is to initiate a discussion on filling this gap. In most cases, co-ordination is performed in connection with management, supervision or control. This type of co-ordination can be described as functional. However, independent co-ordination also exists. Due to the limited number of positive law regulations regarding this type of co-ordination, it is usually limited to the co-ordinating body applying non-executive measures. The co-ordination relationship in administration law is an unusual type. At least three entities are necessary for such a relationship to exist, namely a co-ordinator and two co-ordinated parties. The analysis of co-operation in public administration is possible upon considering the principle of general co-operation as a separate one. This principle could have the status of a general administration law principle, but the positive law does not currently formulate this principle directly. However, it can be derived from various applicable rules, including rules of constitutional importance. This principle dictates that all public administration entities must co-operate with each other. The article attempts to define forms of co-operation, indicating their diversity. Many issues related to co-ordination and co-operation in administration still require scientific explanation. A further stage should involve regulating these activities within the framework of the positive law. This could be implemented by future act – the “General Provisions of Administrative Law”.
EN
One of the main conditions for the effectiveness of each conscious and purposeful action, especially long-term and complex one, is the ability of programming. Whoever takes into consideration catechetical programming decides for a certain process requiring consideration and organisation of actions with reference to particular people and situations. In contemporary catechetical programming, an important premise is the revalorisation of diagnostic elaborations prepared with the participation of specialists in human arts and theology. Reliable assessment of reality leads to the indication of key issues with which the contemporarily catechised deal in Church and in the world. To solve them, detailed programmes which indicate the most vital decisions concerning means, methods and time of activity are necessary. The effectiveness of catechetical programming considerably depends on the ability to work as a team. Therefore, catechetical programming requires commitment of various groups and units, both educational and church ones. Participation and joint responsibility in Church do not only arise from good organisation indications. Most of all, they are the expression of the existence and activity of Church as a community.
EN
Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union (Brexit) will defifi nitely bring various consequences in the field of social security. It is therefore worthwhile to analyse its current perspectives from the point of view of the co-ordination of social security in the EU, taking into account in particular the situation of Poles residing in the United Kingdom (as well as, in a comparative and auxiliary manner, of the British residing in Poland) and of their social rights. Therefore, the article synthetically presents the current state of the EU co-ordination of social security systems in this context, focusing on the examples given above. It has been written at a time, when the prospect of a no-deal Brexit starts looming as a distinct possibility. Even though such a lack of agreement between the parties in question might bring adverse consequences for the said rights, appropriate legal changes (in particular to the EU law) have already been prepared to enter into force, and guarantees of preservation of the rights in question have already been formally put forward. Nevertheless, their scope and practical implementation is still dependent on further political decisions.
PL
Proces wystąpienia Zjednoczonego Królestwa Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej z Unii Europejskiej (Brexit) przyniesie z pewnością różnorakie konsekwencje w zakresie zabezpieczenia społecznego. Warto zatem przyjrzeć się perspektywie Brexitu z punktu widzenia koordynacji systemów zabezpieczenia społecznego w UE, w szczególności biorąc pod uwagę uprawnienia socjalne Polaków w Zjednoczonym Królestwie (a także uzupełniająco i porównawczo Brytyjczyków w Polsce). Celem opracowania jest syntetyczne przedstawienie obecnego stanu koordynacji pod tym właśnie kątem. Biorąc pod uwagę czas powstania tekstu, można stwierdzić, że rysuje się możliwość braku formalnego porozumienia w sprawie Brexitu między Unią Europejską a Zjednoczonym Królestwem. Choć taki rezultat negocjacji między stronami trzeba uznać za zdecydowanie negatywny, to jednak stosowne zmiany w prawie UE zostały już przygotowane do wejścia w życie, zaś gwarancje dotyczące omawianych praw zostały formalnie przedstawione. Zakres i sposób ich faktycznego wprowadzenia w życie zależeć będą jednak od rozstrzygnięć politycznych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.