Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  critical method
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

РАННИЕ СЛАВЯНЕ В ПОВЕСТИ ВРЕМЕННЫХ ЛЕТ МИФЫ ЛЕТОПИСЦЕВ И ИСТОРИОГРАФИИ

100%
Фонт М.
Slavia Antiqua: rocznik poświęcony starożytnościom słowiańskim
|
2020
|
issue 61
53-65
EN
The author of the Primary Chronicle (PC) had a dual purpose of proving the legitimacy of the dynasty of Scandinavian origin and recording the traditions of the ethnic Scandinavian and Slavic populations. The author of this paper endeavours to analyse the authenticity of information provided in the PC concerning the origin of early Slavs. Before a critical method of studying medieval narrative texts was developed in the late 19th and the early 20th century, the authenticity of medieval chronicles had not been questioned. Therefore, the 19th century historiography treated all the information from medieval texts as authentic. In Russian historiography it was A.A. Shakhmatov who while dealing with the PC, laid down the foundations of the critical method in dealing with chronicles. He was the founder of the famous school of historical philology which has placed text analysis at its centre. Despite this approach, a “new hypothesis” appeared in the last decades of the 20th century (see the linguistic theory of O.N. Trubachev) gained wide publicity both in Russia and abroad. Trubachev’s theory did not take into conssideration the results of either text analysis or the findings of archaeology and was a return to the position from the 19th century. The author of the paper shows that this theory was a blind alley.
2
Content available remote

Hermann Cohen i Ernst Cassirer w relacji mistrz–uczeń

87%
Kubalica T.
Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
|
2019
|
vol. 14
|
issue 3
69-80
EN
The aim of the paper is to analyze the relationship between the authority of the master and the disciple occurring between the two main representatives of the Neo-Kantianism of the Marburg School, Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer. The analysis is based on the pragmatic-logical model of authority developed by Jozef M. Bocheński within the framework of his logic of authority in application to research on the basic relations taking place in the history of philosophy. The purpose of the analysis is to verify the hypothesis of the existence of the master– disciple authority relationship between the mentioned representatives of the school and to explain its logical consequences of the basis of historical-philosophical research of this particular philosophical formation.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O sztuce wypowiedzi krytycznej. Analiza wybranych prac Bonifacego Miązka (1935–2018)

73%
Radłowska J.
Orbis Linguarum
|
2018
|
issue 52
5-22
EN
On the art of critical expression. Analysis of selected works of Bonifacy Miązek This article focuses on critical statements and examines many issues related to the art of writing critical texts. Bonifacy Miązek’s critical writings became the starting point for reflection on the broadly understood criticism of literature and the role the critic plays in today’s world. The author’s deliberations concentrate on the principles of creating critical statements and around the literary critic’s workshop and the methods he uses in his work. Bonifacy Miązek in his critical works formulates postulates that are important from the point of view of contemporary criticism of literature and creates a basic set of principles and standards that should be followed by a literary critic in his work. Therefore, this article is the essence of what is important for future scholars and critics of literature and what is the constitutive basis of their texts.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dlaczego metoda krytyczna Poppera jest fascynująca?

51%
Polak P. J.
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
|
2021
|
issue 71
211-216
EN
This review article presents an important, newly published study of Popper's critical method by Zbigniew Liana. The review emphasizes the very high level of the study, points to its originality, and explains why the book is recommended mainly to specialists of Popper's thought. It is also explained how the book manages to contain so many original and valuable analyses in a small volume.
PL
Artykuł recenzyjny przedstawia ważne, świeżo opublikowane opracowanie Popperowskiej metody krytycznej autorstwa Zbigniewa Liany. W recenzji podkreślono bardzo wysoki poziom opracowania, wskazano na jego oryginalność oraz wyjaśniono dlaczego książka ta jest polecana głównie specjalistom od myśli Poppera. Wyjaśniono również, w jaki sposób w niewielkiej objętościowo książce udało się zmieścić wiele oryginalnych i cennych analiz.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.